Consultations in primary care for symptoms attributed to electromagnetic fields – a survey among general practitioners
© Huss and Röösli; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2006
Received: 22 August 2006
Accepted: 30 October 2006
Published: 30 October 2006
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|22 Aug 2006||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|25 Sep 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Michael Kundi|
|28 Sep 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Lennart Hardell|
|12 Oct 2006||Author responded||Author comments - Anke Huss|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|12 Oct 2006||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|25 Oct 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Michael Kundi|
|25 Oct 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Lennart Hardell|
|26 Oct 2006||Author responded||Author comments - Anke Huss|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|26 Oct 2006||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|30 Oct 2006||Editorially accepted|
|30 Oct 2006||Article published||10.1186/1471-2458-6-267|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.