Peer Review reports
From: Implementing chlamydia screening: what do women think? A systematic review of the literature
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
15 May 2006 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
4 Jun 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Mariam Chacko |
4 Jul 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Signe Flottorp |
11 Aug 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Natasha Pavlin |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
11 Aug 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
11 Aug 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Natasha Pavlin |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
11 Aug 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
25 Aug 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Mariam Chacko |
27 Aug 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Signe Flottorp |
30 Aug 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Natasha Pavlin |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
30 Aug 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
1 Sep 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Natasha Pavlin |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
1 Sep 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Publishing | ||
1 Sep 2006 | Editorially accepted | |
1 Sep 2006 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2458-6-221 |
You can find further information about peer review here.