Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
8 Mar 2006 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
17 Mar 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Danny Dorling |
25 Mar 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Enrique Regidor |
4 Apr 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Annette Leclerc |
16 May 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Sarah Wamala |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
16 May 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
16 May 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Sarah Wamala |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
16 May 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
24 May 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Danny Dorling |
28 May 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Enrique Regidor |
15 Jun 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Sarah Wamala |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
15 Jun 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
21 Jun 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Sarah Wamala |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
21 Jun 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Publishing | ||
21 Jun 2006 | Editorially accepted | |
21 Jun 2006 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2458-6-164 |
You can find further information about peer review here.