Primary care staff's views and experiences related to routinely advising patients about physical activity. A questionnaire survey
© Douglas et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2006
Received: 25 January 2006
Accepted: 23 May 2006
Published: 23 May 2006
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|25 Jan 2006||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|20 Feb 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jim McKenna|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|23 Mar 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - C. Raina Elley|
|11 Apr 2006||Author responded||Author comments - Flora Douglas|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|11 Apr 2006||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|8 May 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jim McKenna|
|17 May 2006||Author responded||Author comments - Flora Douglas|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|17 May 2006||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|23 May 2006||Editorially accepted|
|23 May 2006||Article published||10.1186/1471-2458-6-138|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.