Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Evaluation of reporting timeliness of public health surveillance systems for infectious diseases

BMC Public Health20044:29

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-4-29

Received: 13 February 2004

Accepted: 26 July 2004

Published: 26 July 2004

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
13 Feb 2004 Submitted Original manuscript
6 Apr 2004 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nkuchia M'ikanatha
5 May 2004 Reviewed Reviewer Report - James Gibson
21 Jun 2004 Author responded Author comments - Ruth Ann Jajosky
Resubmission - Version 2
21 Jun 2004 Submitted Manuscript version 2
30 Jun 2004 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nkuchia M'ikanatha
16 Jul 2004 Author responded Author comments - Ruth Ann Jajosky
Resubmission - Version 3
16 Jul 2004 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
19 Jul 2004 Author responded Author comments - Ruth Ann Jajosky
Resubmission - Version 5
19 Jul 2004 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
26 Jul 2004 Editorially accepted
26 Jul 2004 Article published 10.1186/1471-2458-4-29

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Epidemiology Program Office, Division of Public Health Surveillance and Informatics, Surveillance Systems Branch
(2)
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for HIV, STD, & TB Prevention, Division of STD Prevention, Statistics and Data Management Branch
(3)
At the time this study was conducted this co-author was Chief of the Surveillance Systems Branch

Advertisement