"New Choices" for women with addictions: perceptions of program participants
© Sword et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2004
Received: 09 July 2003
Accepted: 15 April 2004
Published: 15 April 2004
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|9 Jul 2003||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|25 Jul 2003||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Deena Nardi|
|30 Oct 2003||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sara Gutierres|
|18 Nov 2003||Author responded||Author comments - Wendy Sword|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|18 Nov 2003||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|22 Nov 2003||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Deena Nardi|
|8 Jan 2004||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sara Gutierres|
|3 Feb 2004||Author responded||Author comments - Wendy Sword|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|3 Feb 2004||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|26 Mar 2004||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sara Gutierres|
|7 Apr 2004||Author responded||Author comments - Wendy Sword|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|7 Apr 2004||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|15 Apr 2004||Editorially accepted|
|15 Apr 2004||Article published||10.1186/1471-2458-4-10|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.