Risks of serious complications and death from smallpox vaccination: A systematic review of the United States experience, 1963–1968
© Aragón et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2003
Received: 18 March 2003
Accepted: 11 August 2003
Published: 11 August 2003
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|18 Mar 2003||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|14 May 2003||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Paolo Bonanni|
|3 Jun 2003||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - William Thompson|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|1 Jul 2003||Author responded||Author comments - Tomas Aragon|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|1 Jul 2003||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|11 Aug 2003||Editorially accepted|
|11 Aug 2003||Article published||10.1186/1471-2458-3-26|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.