Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Interrelationships among sedentary time, sleep duration, and the metabolic syndrome in adults

BMC Public Health201414:666

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-666

Received: 21 March 2014

Accepted: 26 June 2014

Published: 30 June 2014

Abstract

Background

The study objectives were to examine whether: 1) sedentary time is associated with sleep duration, 2) sedentary time predicts the metabolic syndrome (MetS) independent of sleep duration and vice versa, and 3) sedentary time and sleep duration have an interactive effect on the MetS.

Methods

This cross-sectional study is based on the 2003–2006 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. A sample of 1371 adults (aged ≥20 years) were studied. Average daily sedentary time and sleep duration were determined via 7-day accelerometry. Screen time was determined via questionnaire. The MetS was determined using standard criteria. Analysis of variance was used to examine relationships among sedentary time and screen time with sleep duration. Logistic regression was used to examine associations between sedentary time, screen time, and sleep duration with the MetS after controlling for several confounders.

Results

Sedentary time and screen time did not vary across sleep duration quartiles. Participants in the highest quartile of sedentary time were more likely to have the MetS than participants in the lowest quartile (odds ratio = 1.60, 95% CI:1.05-2.45). The odds of the MetS was higher in participants in the highest screen time tertile as compared to the lowest tertile (odds ratio = 1.67, 95% confidence interval:1.13-2.48). Sleep duration was not independently related to the MetS. There were no significant sedentary time X sleep duration interactions on the MetS.

Conclusion

Highly sedentary individuals and individuals with a high screen time are more likely to have the MetS.

Background

Research on the health benefits of movement has traditionally focused on a lack of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) [1]. Recently, homage has also been given to excessive sedentary behavior [1, 2] and insufficient sleep [3, 4]. Sedentary behavior is defined as time spent sitting or lying during waking hours [5] while insufficient sleep is defined as sleeping less than 7 hours/day [6].

Time spent being sedentary may be connected to sleep duration. Large cross-sectional studies of children have shown that excessive TV watching and computer use are associated with short sleep duration [79]. An experimental study of 18 overweight adults showed that the proportion of waking hours spent sedentary increased from 83% to 87% after sleep was restricted by 3 hours [10]. Participants in that study reported feeling more weary and had less vigor after sleep restriction. Since few studies have addressed the association between sedentary time and sleep duration in adults, additional research is warranted.

Sedentary time and sleep duration have both been linked to the metabolic syndrome (MetS), a clustering of risk factors for cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes, and other cardiometabolic risk factors [14, 1116]. We are only aware of one study that has simultaneously examined sedentary time and sleep duration [14]. That study reported that reallocating 30 minutes/day from sedentary time to sleep was associated with about a 2% difference in insulin sensitivity. However, that study used a self-reported measure of sleep duration and validation studies indicate that people have difficulties assessing their own sleep and report biased estimates [17, 18]. Furthermore, that study did not determine whether the association between sedentary time and cardiometabolic health is moderated by sleep duration and/or whether the association between sleep duration and cardiometabolic health is moderated by sedentary time.

This study had three objectives. First, we examined the association between sedentary time and sleep duration in a large sample of adults. Second, we examined whether sedentary time predicted the MetS independent of sleep duration and vice versa. Third, we examined whether sedentary time and sleep duration had an interactive effect on the MetS.

Methods

Overview of study design and measures

Study data are from the 2003–2004 and 2005–2006 cycles of the U.S. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). NHANES is a nationally representative cross-sectional study that assesses the health of adults and children. It combines interviews, physical examinations, and laboratory tests that take place in a home interview and mobile examination center visit. NHANES uses a complex, multistage probability sampling design to select participants. Sampling weights were applied in the analysis to reflect the unequal probability of participation among certain demographic groups.

NHANES was approved by the National Center for Health Statistics Research Ethics Review Board and participants provided informed consent. Ethics approval for the secondary analysis conducted for this study was obtained from the Queen’s University Health Sciences Research Ethics Board.

Participants

The present study was limited to non-pregnant adult (aged ≥20 years) participants without chronic disease (cancer, diabetes, coronary heart disease, stroke, chronic bronchitis and emphysema) who comprised the morning fasting subsample. Of the 3373 participants who met these eligibility criteria, 191 were excluded because they were missing one or more components of the MetS, 1462 were excluded because they did not have valid accelerometer data for the sedentary time and/or sleep duration measures, and 349 were excluded because they were missing one or more of the covariates. Thus, the final sample consisted of 1371 participants. Although many participants were lost because they failed to meet the eligibility criteria, only 6% of participants who were in the morning subsample were lost because they did not have sufficient MetS information and it was therefore acceptable to continue the analysis. Participants who were excluded from this study were similar in age (51 vs. 49 years) and ethnicity (52% vs. 54% non-Hispanic white) to those who were included. However, more females than males were excluded (56% vs. 50% male), which was largely explained by the exclusion of 330 pregnant women.

Sedentary time

Time spent being sedentary was measured using the uniaxial Actigraph AM-7164 accelerometer. Accelerometers are small electronic devices which assess, minute-by-minute data on the volume, intensity, duration and frequency of most movement. Accelerometers provide a reliable and valid measure of sedentary time. When assessed against the activePAL, a triaxial inclinometer that differentiates between sitting and standing, correlations of sedentary time are high (r = 0.76) [19].

Participants were given the accelerometer at the mobile exam center visit and instructed to wear it for the following 7 days over their right hip using the elastic belt provided, and to remove the monitor before going to bed and during showers, bathing, and swimming. The accelerometers provided 10,080 consecutive minute-by-minute movement data points (e.g., one data point for each minute of the week). After the 7 day measurement period accelerometers were returned to the NHANES investigators by mail.

The first stage of accelerometer data cleaning was conducted by NHANES investigators who removed outliers or biologically implausible values. The remaining data cleaning and reduction was completed by the authors using established criteria [20, 21]. Initially, periods of non-wear time were removed. Non-wear time was defined as an interval of at least 60 consecutive minutes of 0 activity intensity counts, with allowance for 1–2 min of counts above 0 [20, 21]. In the next step, days that were invalid were removed. A valid day was defined as a day with at least 10 hours of wear time [20, 21]. The next step was to remove participants with an insufficient number of valid days. Only participants with at least 4 valid days were included in the analysis [20, 21].

Next, each minute of accelerometer data was defined as being sedentary or of a light or moderate-to-vigorous intensity using established cut-points. A given minute was considered sedentary if the accelerometer count value did not exceed the 100 counts per minute threshold [12, 22]. Counts ranging from 100–2020 were classified as light intensity activity and counts of 2020 or higher were considered MVPA [20]. Total sedentary time and time spent in light intensity physical activity and MVPA were calculated for each valid day by summing the number of minutes, and then averaged across all valid days. Wear time was calculated by subtracting non-wear time from 24 hours. The proportion of total wear time that was sedentary was then determined. The proportion of total wear time that was sedentary was divided into quartiles as following: Q1 = 21.0-48.1%, Q2 = 48.2-56.5%, Q3 = 56.5-63.9%, Q4 = 64.0-90.7%.

Screen time

The second exposure variable measured total screen time (including TV, video, and computer use) using the interview questions, “Over the past 30 days, on average how many hours per day did you sit and watch TV or videos?” and “Over the past 30 days, on average how many hours per day did you use a computer or play computer games?” There were 7 response options for each question: 0 hours, less than 1 hour, 1 hour, 2 hours, 3 hours, 4 hours, and 5 or more hours. TV and computer time were summed to create an overall screen time score. Screen time was then divided into tertiles. The range of screen time (hours/day) for each tertile is as follows: T1 = 0–1, T2 = 2, T3 = 3-6. Questionnaires measuring TV time, such as the NHANES questionnaire, are moderately correlated with TV time measured by a detailed log (r = 0.47) [23].

Sleep duration

While population-based studies have typically used self-report questionnaires to gather sleep duration data, self-report data are poorly correlated with criterion measures and are systematically biased [17, 18]. Therefore, in this study sleep duration was estimated using an objective proxy measure. Using data gathered from accelerometry, the longest period of non-wear time in the 24-hour period between 12:00 noon on two valid days was used as a proxy for sleep duration. The same criteria as explained above under sedentary time were used to define non-wear time periods and valid days. Only those who had ≥2 valid sleep night periods were included in the analysis. The criteria for having ≥2 valid sleep nights was determined by examining the correlation between the sleep duration proxy measures from participants who had complete (6 nights) sleep data. These analyses revealed the flowing correlations with the average sleep duration obtained over 6 nights: r = 0.77 for one randomly chosen night, r = 0.84 for two randomly chosen nights, r = 0.93 for three randomly chosen nights, r = 0.95 for four randomly chosen nights, and r = 0.98 for 5 randomly chosen nights. Because the correlation for 2 nights (r = 0.84) is very strong, and because there was a large drop in sample size with ≥2 nights of valid data vs. ≥3 nights of valid data (n = 1371 vs. n = 984), ≥2 nights was chosen as the criteria.

The average proxy sleep duration was calculated by averaging the sleep duration across the number of nights with valid data and then divided into quartiles as follows: Q1 = 3.0-7.2 hours/night, Q2 = 7.2-8.6 hours/night, Q3 = 8.6-9.7 hours/night, Q4 = 9.7-11.8 hours/night. Extreme sleep duration observations (below 2nd and above 98th percentile) were deleted since they were thought to inaccurately represent sleep duration as because they were outside the physiological range of sleep duration times. These values could have resulted from participants removing their accelerometer before bed or a temporary error with the accelerometer device that can cause high count values to sporadically occur [24].

Metabolic syndrome

Participants were classified as having the MetS using standard criteria [25] based on having three or more of the following five risk factors: high waist circumference (≥94 cm in men, ≥80 cm in women), high triglycerides (≥150 mg/dL), low HDL-cholesterol (<40 mg/dL in men, <50 mg/dL in women), high blood pressure (systolic ≥130 mmHg or diastolic ≥85 mmHg or medication use), and high blood glucose (≥100 mg/dL or presences of diabetes or medication use).

All MetS component data were taken by trained technicians. Waist circumference was obtained to the closest 0.1 cm using a flexible tape at the level of the iliac crest. Prior to measuring blood pressure, participants rested quietly in a seated position for 5 minutes. Then, four blood pressure readings were obtained using a manual mercury sphygmomanometer. Blood pressure measurements were averaged for each participant. Blood was drawn from an antecubital vein of the left arm following an overnight fast. HDL-cholesterol was measured using the direct HDL immunoassay method [26]. Cholesterol and triglycerides were measured enzymatically in a series of coupled reactions hydrolyzing cholesterol ester and triglyceride to cholesterol and glycerol, respectively [27]. Fasting plasma glucose was determined using a hexokinase enzymatic method [28]. The presence of physician diagnosed diabetes (other than gestational diabetes) and medication use for diabetes and hypertension were assessed in the interview.

Confounders

Age, sex, ethnicity (non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black, Hispanic, other), education level (less than high school, high school graduate, college graduate), socioeconomic status (SES), smoking status (never, former or current), alcohol consumption, caffeine consumption, and physical activity were considered as confounders. SES was assessed using the poverty-to-income ratio, which is a ratio between family income and the poverty threshold [29]. Caffeine consumption was assessed using a 24-hour food recall and those who consumed more than 250 mg/day of caffeine were considered high caffeine users [30]. Females who consumed more than 7 alcoholic drinks/week and males who consumed more than 14 alcoholic drinks/week were considered excessive alcohol users [31]. Finally, MVPA was assessed by accelerometry as previously described [20]. Mean duration of MVPA per day accumulated in bouts of at least 10 minutes was calculated for all participants and three groups were created: no bouts of MVPA, some MVPA (up to 75 minutes/week), and at least 75 minutes/week of MVPA. These cut points are based on half of the minimum physical activity in the public health guidelines [32].

Statistical analysis

All data were analyzed using the SAS 9.2 Software (SAS Inc., Cary, NC) and took into consideration the complex survey design and sample weights. Descriptive statistics were used to determine baseline characteristics of the study population. Relations between sedentary time and sleep duration variables were determined using Pearson correlations. ANOVA were used to explore the relationship between sleep duration with the proportion of total wear time that was sedentary and screen time. Multiple logistic regression was performed to examine the relationship between the sedentary time and sleep duration variables with the MetS and its individual components. Initially, univariate models were used to describe the associations between the sedentary time and sleep duration variables with the MetS. This was followed by two multivariate models. The first multivariate model included screen time, sleep duration, and the covariates. Total sedentary time replaced screen time in the second multivariate model. To adjust for potential confounders in the multivariate models, the backward deletion according to change in estimate criteria approach was used [33]. Therefore, after starting with a full model of all confounders, potential confounders that did not change the risk estimate for the MetS for at least one of the key exposures (sedentary time or sleep duration) by more than 5% were removed in a stepwise fashion. Finally, sedentary time (or screen time) X sleep duration interaction terms were added to the models to assess whether sleep had a moderating effect on the sedentary time-MetS relationship.

Results

Descriptive characteristics

Participant characteristics are in Table 1. Of the 1371 participants, approximately 56% were male and the mean age was 49 years. Overall, 56% of total accelerometry wear time was spent sedentary. The proxy sleep duration was 8.3 hours per night. Participants watched 2.2 hours/day of TV and used the computer for 44 minutes/day, for a total of 2.3 hours/day of screen time.
Table 1

Characteristics of the study sample

Characteristic

N = 1371

Prevalence (%)

Mean (SD)

Demographic Factors

   

Sex, % male

770

56.2

-

Age (years)

   

  20-39

451

32.9

-

  40-59

523

38.2

 

  60+

397

29.0

 

Ethnicity

  

-

  Non-Hispanic white

738

53.8

 

  Non-Hispanic black

245

17.9

 

  Hispanic

334

24.4

 

  Other

54

3.9

 

Education

  

-

  < High school

313

22.8

 

  High school graduate

742

54.1

 

  College graduate

316

23.1

 

Poverty level, % below poverty

153

11.2

-

Behavioral Factors

   

Caffeine consumption, % ≥250 mg/day

284

20.7

-

Smoking status

  

-

  Never

669

48.8

 

  Former

404

29.5

 

  Current

298

21.7

 

Alcohol consumption (drinks/week)

  

-

  None

312

22.8

 

  Some

1040

75.9

 

  Excessive

19

1.4

 

Sedentary Behavior

-

-

 

  Screen time (hours/day)

  

2.3 (1.0)

  % of total wear time that is sedentary

  

56.2 (11.3)

Sleep duration proxy (hours/day)

  

8.3 (1.9)

Moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (min/day)

-

-

7.0 (12.5)

Metabolic Syndrome Components

   

Metabolic syndrome, % yes

512

37.4

-

Waist circumference (cm), % high

987

72.0

97 (14)

HDL-cholesterol (mg/dL), % low

418

30.5

55 (16)

Triglycerides (mg/dL), % high

416

30.3

140 (113)

Glucose (mg/dL), % high

521

38.0

99 (17)

Systolic blood pressure (mmHg), % high

518

37.8

124 (17)

Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg), % high

214

15.6

71 (11)

Relationships between sedentary time and sleep duration variables

Total sedentary time and screen time were weakly correlated (r = 0.18). Sedentary time and screen time were poorly correlated to sleep duration (r = 0.04 and r = 0.004, respectively). As shown in Table 2, sedentary time and screen time means did not vary across the sleep duration quartiles (p = 0.08 and p = 0.87, respectively).
Table 2

Means and adjusted means* of the sedentary behavior variables according to sleep duration

Sleep duration quartile

Screen time (hours/day)

% of total wear time that is sedentary

 

Mean (SD)

Adjusted mean* (SD)

Mean (SD)

Adjusted mean *(SD)

Q1 (shortest sleep)

2.35 (1.05)

2.40 (2.22)

56.05 (11.01)

57.72 (22.77)

Q2

2.30 (0.92)

2.41 (1.98)

58.13 (10.76)

57.36 (23.51)

Q3

2.30 (0.97)

2.47 (2.09)

57.59 (10.94)

56.57 (23.14)

Q4 (longest sleep)

2.35 (0.90)

2.50 (1.94)

57.91 (10.65)

56.23 (23.51)

p-value

0.87

0.87

0.13

0.08

*Adjusted for all sex, age, ethnicity, education, poverty level, caffeine consumption, alcohol consumption and MVPA.

Relationship between sedentary time and sleep duration with the MetS

Of those participants who accrued the most screen time, 44% had the MetS. Conversely, only 29% in the lowest screen time tertile had the MetS. Of the most sedentary participants, 46% had the MetS; only 32% in the lowest sedentary time quartile had the MetS. There was no trend in the prevalence of the MetS across sleep duration groups (Table 3).
Table 3

Prevalence and odds ratio (95% confidence interval) for the metabolic syndrome according to sedentary time and sleep duration

Exposure or confounder

Prevalence, %

Univariate models

Multivariate model 1*

Multivariate model 2**

Exposures

    

Screen time

  T1 (least screen time)

29.3

1.00 (ref)

1.00 (ref)

 

  T2

35.3

1.32 (0.96-1.81)

1.18 (0.81-1.72)

 

  T3 (most screen time)

44.1

1.91 (1.38-2.64)

1.67 (1.13-2.48)

 

Sedentary time

    

  Q1 (least sedentary)

32.4

1.00 (ref)

 

1.00 (ref)

  Q2

34.1

1.18 (0.80-1.76)

 

1.00 (0.66-1.51)

  Q3

37.0

1.44 (0.98-2.1)

 

1.25 (0.83-1.89)

  Q4 (most sedentary)

45.9

2.10 (1.44-3.06)

 

1.60 (1.05-2.45)

Sleep duration

    

  Q1 (shortest sleep)

34.1

0.86 (0.60-1.23)

0.90 (0.62-1.32)

0.91 (0.62-1.33)

  Q2

37.4

1.00 (ref)

1.00 (ref)

1.00 (ref)

  Q3

35.6

0.93 (0.65-1.33)

0.89 (0.61-1.30)

0.89 (0.61-1.29)

  Q4 (longest sleep)

39.8

1.12 (0.78-1.60)

0.97 (0.67-1.41)

0.95 (0.66-1.39)

Relevant Confounders

    

Age

    

  20-39 y

23.3

1.00 (ref)

1.00 (ref)

1.00 (ref)

  40-59 y

37.1

2.24 (1.60-3.13)

2.29 (1.63-3.22)

2.23 (1.58-3.13)

  60+ y

53.7

4.00 (2.82-5.67)

4.00 (2.81-5.71)

3.13 (2.16-4.54)

Ethnicity

    

  Non-Hispanic white

39.2

1.00 (ref)

1.00 (ref)

 

  Non-Hispanic black

29.8

0.60 (0.42-0.87)

0.60 (0.41-0.88)

 

  Hispanic

38.0

0.96 (0.70-1.31)

1.10 (0.79-1.54)

 

  Other

42.6

1.45 (0.77-2.71)

1.55 (0.80-3.00)

 

Education

    

  Less than high school

44.4

1.00 (ref)

 

1.00 (ref)

  High school graduate

37.3

0.78 (0.56-1.07)

 

0.86 (0.61-1.21)

  College graduate

30.4

0.61 (0.42-0.89)

 

0.69 (0.45-1.03)

Moderate-to-vigorous physical activity

    

  None

44.3

1.00 (ref)

 

1.00 (ref)

  Some

34.7

0.54 (0.39-0.74)

 

0.70 (0.49-0.98)

  Moderate

25.8

0.46 (0.33-0.64)

 

0.58 (0.41-0.81)

Remaining Confounders

    

Sex

    

  Male

40.5

1.00 (ref)

  

  Female

33.3

0.75 (0.58-0.97)

  

Poverty level

    

  Below

43.8

1.36 (0.91-2.03)

  

  Above

36.5

1.00 (ref)

  

Caffeine

    

  <250 mg/day

36.7

1.00 (ref)

  

  > = 250 mg/day

39.8

1.18 (0.87-1.61)

  

Smoking Status

    

  Never

35.1

1.00 (ref)

  

  Former

42.8

1.45 (1.08-1.95)

  

  Current

34.9

0.93 (0.67-1.30)

  

Alcohol consumption

    

  None

45.2

1.52 (1.13-2.05)

  

  Some

35.1

1.00 (ref)

  

  Excessive

31.6

0.57 (0.16-2.08)

  

*Multivariate model 1 includes screen time and sleep duration as the main exposures.

**Multivariate model 2 includes sedentary time and sleep duration as the main exposures.

†The backward deletion according the change in estimate approach was used to identify relevant confounders. Confounders that changed the odds ratio for the main exposures by >5% were kept in the model and those that did not were removed.

After adjusting for relevant confounders (age, education level, MVPA) and sleep duration, the relative odds of the MetS was higher in participants in the highest sedentary time quartile by comparison to participants in the lowest quartile (odds ratio (OR) = 1.60, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.05-2.45). A positive relationship was also observed with screen time such that the odds ratio of the MetS was higher in participants in the highest screen time tertile as compared to the lowest tertile (OR = 1.67, 95% CI:1.13-2.48). Sleep duration was not related to the MetS in the bivariate or multivariate logistic regression models. There were no significant sedentary time X sleep duration or screen time X sleep duration interactions in any of the models.

Relationship between sedentary time and sleep duration with the MetS components

As shown in Table 4, sedentary time and screen time were significantly associated with a high waist circumference, high triglycerides, and a low HLD-cholesterol (sedentary time only). The associations between sleep duration and the MetS components were weak and non-significant. There were no significant sedentary time X sleep duration or screen time X sleep duration interactions in any of the models.
Table 4

Odds ratio (95% confidence interval) for the metabolic syndrome components according to sleep duration and sedentary time

Exposure

High triglycerides*

High plasma glucose**

High waist circumference†

High blood pressure

Low HDL-cholesterol

Sleep duration

     

  Q1 (shortest sleep)

0.90 (0.61-1.33)

1.08 (0.74-1.59)

1.25 (0.85-1.84)

1.12 (0.76-1.65)

1.20 (0.78-1.85)

  Q2

1.00 (ref)

1.00 (ref)

1.00 (ref)

1.00 (ref)

1.00 (ref)

  Q3

1.26 (0.86-1.84)

1.03 (0.70-1.50)

1.07 (0.72-1.57)

0.89 (0.60-1.31)

0.89 (0.59-1.34)

  Q4 (longest sleep)

1.13 (0.77-1.66)

0.96 (0.66-1.41)

1.26 (0.84-1.87)

1.15 (0.78-1.70)

1.23 (0.80-1.89)

Screen time

     

  T1 (least screen time)

1.00 (ref)

1.00 (ref)

1.00 (ref)

1.00 (ref)

1.00 (ref)

  T2

1.56 (1.03-2.37)

0.94 (0.64-1.38)

1.38 (0.93-2.04)

1.02 (0.68-1.52)

0.79 (0.50-1.23)

  T3 (most screen time)

1.71 (1.11-2.63)

0.76 (0.51-1.13)

1.53 (1.09-2.32)

1.43 (0.94-2.17)

0.65 (0.41-1.03)

Sedentary time

     

  Q1 (least sedentary)

1.00 (ref)

1.00 (ref)

1.00 (ref)

1.00 (ref)

1.00 (ref)

  Q2

1.23 (0.78-1.93)

1.46 (0.97-2.22)

1.48 (0.97-2.26)

0.87 (0.57-1.34)

0.64 (0.40-1.04)

  Q3

1.85 (1.18-2.88)

1.07 (0.71-1.61)

1.83 (1.19-2.81)

1.15 (0.75-1.77)

0.90 (0.55-1.48)

  Q4 (most sedentary)

1.81 (1.15-2.85)

0.86 (0.57-1.31)

1.81 (1.16-2.83)

0.94 (0.59-1.47)

0.56 (0.35-0.92)

*Alcohol consumption was the only significant confounder.

**No significant confounders.

†Significant confounders include sex, ethnicity, and smoking status.

Age was the only significant confounder.

Smoking was the only significant confounder.

Discussion

This study examined associations between sedentary time, sleep duration, and the MetS in adults. Sedentary time and sleep duration were not correlated. There were moderate associations between sedentary time and screen time with the MetS; however, sleep duration was not associated with the MetS. Sedentary time and sleep duration did not have an interactive effect on the MetS.

Results from this study indicate that the average adult spends over half of their waking hours being sedentary. Adults who spend between 65-90% of their day sedentary were more likely (OR = 1.60, 95% CI:1.05-2.45) to have the MetS than those who spent less than 48% of their day sedentary. This result is consistent with a previous study that used the NHANES dataset [12], and with several other cross-sectional studies that report moderate associations between sedentary time and cardiometabolic risk [15]. Additionally, the strongest associations with sedentary time were observed for waist circumference and triglycerides, which is consistent with previous evidence [12]. We extended existing knowledge by demonstrating that the relationship between sedentary time and the MetS was not moderated by sleep duration. In other words, these relationships were consistent in short, medium, and long sleepers.

Adults who spent more than 3 hours per day in front of TV and computer screens were at increased odds (OR = 1.67, 95% CI:1.13-2.48) for having the MetS compared to those who spent less than 1 hour per day, which is also consistent with previous literature [13, 16]. These findings are important because they provide context to the type of sedentary behavior that is likely to confer a health risk. Futures studies would benefit from examining other types of sedentary behavior outside of screen time since little is known about the health impact of non-screen based sedentary behavior and because different sedentary behaviors may require distinct interventions.

Sleep duration was unrelated to sedentary time and screen time in this large and diverse sample of adults. This is contrary to observational findings reported in children and youth [79] and experimental studies from a small (n = 18) sample of adults [10]. It is unclear what accounts for these discrepant findings.

Although sleep duration was not associated with the MetS in this study, there was a borderline positive association with sleep duration and waist circumference, which is consistent with recent evidence indicating that short sleep is associated with abdominal adiposity [34]. Although previous studies examining this relationship found stronger associations with sleep duration and obesity, most of them have relied on self-report methods to capture sleep duration. If the misclassification associated with self-reported sleep duration measures is differential, that could explain the different results. Future studies should considering control for obstructive sleep apnea, which may be a significant confounder, and should explore relationships with sleep onset timing rather than sleep duration, since timing is a factor that is related to unhealthy eating behaviors [35], circadian rhythm disruption [36], and melatonin suppression [36].

Although it is still unclear how much sedentary time leads to an increased health risk, this study has shown a monotonic relationship, with more sedentary time leading to an increased odds of the MetS. Therefore, time spent being sedentary is significant, even if the only plausible explanation is that it displaces time spent in light-intensity physical activity, leading to a reduction in overall energy expenditure [37]. Even substituting 2 hours/day of sedentary time (1.5 METS) with light-intensity activity (2.5 METs) would be the equivalent of a 30 minute brisk walk [37]. A recent randomized control study showed the significant impact of making this simple substitution. Adults who participated in a TV commercial stepping program (replaced sitting screen-time with light-intensity physical activity) had significant decreases in their percent body fat and waist circumference over a 6 month period [38]. Altogether, this evidence has important implications for future public health initiatives and interventions. A next step would be to identify the key modifiable factors lead to excessive sedentary time, as the determinants of sedentary time have not been studied extensively [39].

An important strength of this study is that sedentary time and sleep duration were measured objectively. Additionally, we used waist circumference, which has been shown to explain obesity-related health risk to a greater extent than BMI [40]. Our study has important limitations. Firstly, temporal associations could not be determined due to the cross-sectional nature of this study. Also, measurement bias may have been present because of the use of self-reported data for many of the confounders and screen time. We were not able to control for or eliminate all potential confounders, most notably the presence of sleep apnea. The sleep duration measure, while objective, was still a proxy measure and it is likely that sleep duration was overestimated with this proxy measure. Finally, the accelerometers used in NHANES did not accurately capture all activities (eg, swimming, cycling, load-bearing activities) and there is a lack of consensus in the literature around the optimal accelerometer data reduction and cleaning procedures.

Conclusion

Time spent sedentary is related to cardiometabolic risk, independent of sleep duration, although prospective evidence is needed to confirm the direction of the relationship. Additionally, more prospective research using objective measures of sleep duration, timing, and quality are needed to explore the relationship between sleep with sedentary time and cardiometabolic risk.

Abbreviations

CI: 

Confidence interval

HDL: 

High density lipoprotein

NHANES: 

National health and nutrition examination survey

MetS: 

Metabolic syndrome

MVPA: 

Moderate-to-vigorous physical activity

OR: 

Odds ratio.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Funding for this project was provided by the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Ontario. IJ was supported by a Canada Research Chair award.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Public Health Sciences, Queen’s University
(2)
School of Kinesiology and Health Studies, Queen’s University

References

  1. Owen N, Bauman A, Brown W: Too much sitting: a novel and important predictor of chronic disease risk?. Br J Sports Med. 2009, 43 (2): 81-83.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Tremblay MS, Colley RC, Saunders TJ, Healy GN, Owen N: Physiological and health implications of a sedentary lifestyle. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2010, 35 (6): 725-740.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Wu MC, Yang YC, Wu JS, Wang RH, Lu FH, Chang CJ: Short sleep duration associated with a higher prevalence of metabolic syndrome in an apparently healthy population. Prev Med. 2012, 55 (4): 305-309.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Van Cauter E, Spiegel K, Tasali E, Leproult R: Metabolic consequences of sleep and sleep loss. Sleep Med. 2008, 9 (Suppl 1): S23-S28.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Network SBR: Standardized use of the terms ‘sedentary’ and ‘sedentary behaviours’. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2012, 37: 540-542.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. How much sleep do we really need?. http://sleepfoundation.org/how-sleep-works/how-much-sleep-do-we-really-need,
  7. Leatherdale ST, Wong SL: Modifiable characteristics associated with sedentary behaviours among youth. Int J Pediatr Obes. 2008, 3 (2): 93-101.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Foley LS, Maddison R, Jiang Y, Marsh S, Olds T, Ridley K: Presleep activities and time of sleep onset in children. Pediatrics. 2013, 131 (2): 276-282.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Drescher AA, Goodwin JL, Silva GE, Quan SF: Caffeine and screen time in adolescence: associations with short sleep and obesity. J Clin Sleep Med. 2011, 7 (4): 337-342.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Bromley LE, Booth JN, Kilkus JM, Imperial JG, Penev PD: Sleep restriction decreases the physical activity of adults at risk for type 2 diabetes. Sleep. 2012, 35 (7): 977-984.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Healy GN, Wijndaele K, Dunstan DW, Shaw JE, Salmon J, Zimmet PZ, Owen N: Objectively measured sedentary time, physical activity, and metabolic risk: the Australian diabetes, obesity and lifestyle study (AusDiab). Diabetes Care. 2008, 31 (2): 369-371.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Healy GN, Matthews CE, Dunstan DW, Winkler EA, Owen N: Sedentary time and cardio-metabolic biomarkers in US adults: NHANES 2003–06. Eur Heart J. 2011, 32 (5): 590-597.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Clark BK, Healy GN, Winkler EA, Gardiner PA, Sugiyama T, Dunstan DW, Matthews CE, Owen N: Relationship of television time with accelerometer-derived sedentary time: NHANES. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011, 43 (5): 822-828.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Buman MP, Winkler EA, Kurka JM, Hekler EB, Baldwin CM, Owen N, Ainsworth BE, Healy GN, Gardiner PA: Reallocating time to sleep, sedentary behaviors, or active behaviors: associations with cardiovascular disease risk biomarkers, NHANES 2005–2006. Am J Epidemiol. 2014, 179 (3): 323-334.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Edwardson CL, Gorely T, Davies MJ, Gray LJ, Khunti K, Wilmot EG, Yates T, Biddle SJ: Association of sedentary behaviour with metabolic syndrome: a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2012, 7 (4): e34916-View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Healy GN, Dunstan DW, Salmon J, Shaw JE, Zimmet PZ, Owen N: Television time and continuous metabolic risk in physically active adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008, 40 (4): 639-645.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Lauderdale DS, Knutson KL, Yan LL, Liu K, Rathouz PJ: Self-reported and measured sleep duration: how similar are they?. Epidemiology. 2008, 19 (6): 838-845.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Girschik J, Fritschi L, Heyworth J, Waters F: Validation of self-reported sleep against actigraphy. J Epidemiol. 2012, 22 (5): 462-468.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Healy GN, Clark BK, Winkler EA, Gardiner PA, Brown WJ, Matthews CE: Measurement of adults’ sedentary time in population-based studies. Am J Prev Med. 2011, 41 (2): 216-227.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Troiano RP, Berrigan D, Dodd KW, Masse LC, Tilert T, McDowell M: Physical activity in the United States measured by accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008, 40 (1): 181-188.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Colley R, Connor Gorber S, Tremblay MS: Quality control and data reduction procedures for accelerometry-derived measures of physical activity. Health Rep. 2010, 21 (1): 63-69.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Matthews CE, Chen KY, Freedson PS, Buchowski MS, Beech BM, Pate RR, Troiano RP: Amount of time spent in sedentary behaviors in the United States, 2003–2004. Am J Epidemiol. 2008, 167 (7): 875-881.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Sirard JR, Pate RR: Physical activity assessment in children and adolescents. Sports Med. 2001, 31 (6): 439-454.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Esliger D, Tremblay MT: Physical activity and inactivity profiling: the next generation. Can J Public Health. 2007, 98 (Suppl 2): S195-S207.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Alberti KG, Eckel RH, Grundy SM, Zimmet PZ, Cleeman JI, Donato KA, Fruchart JC, James WP, Loria CM, Smith SC: Harmonizing the metabolic syndrome: a joint interim statement of the international diabetes federation task force on epidemiology and prevention; national heart, lung, and blood institute; American heart association; world heart federation; international atherosclerosis society; and international association for the study of obesity. Circulation. 2009, 120 (16): 1640-1645.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. National health and nutrition examination survey codebook for data production (2005–2006): HDL-cholesterol (HDL_D) person level data. 2007, http://wwwn.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/2005-2006/HDL_D.htm#Description_of_Laboratory_Methodology,
  27. National health and nutrition examination survey codebook for data production (2005–2006): total cholesterol (TCHOL_D) person level data. 2007, http://wwwn.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/2005-2006/TCHOL_D.htm#Description_of_Laboratory_Methodology,
  28. Harris MI, Flegal KM, Cowie CC, Eberhardt MS, Goldstein DE, Little RR, Wiedmeyer HM, Byrd-Holt DD: Prevalence of diabetes, impaired fasting glucose, and impaired glucose tolerance in U.S. adults: the third national health and nutrition examination survey, 1988–1994. Diabetes Care. 1998, 21 (4): 518-524.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Census Bureau US: Population Division, Fertility & Family Statistics Branch. 2004, Current Population Survey: Definitions and explanationsGoogle Scholar
  30. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, U.S. Department of Agriculture: Dietary Guidelines for Americans 2005. 2005, Washington, D.C: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, (available at: http://www.health.gov/dietaryguidelines/). Volume [Publication No. HHS-ODPHP-2005-01-DGA-A]Google Scholar
  31. National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism: The Physicians’ Guide to Helping Patients with Alcohol Problems (NIH Publication No 95–3796). 1995, Washington: United States Department of Health and Human ServicesGoogle Scholar
  32. World Health Organization: Global Recommendations on Physical Activity for Health. 2010, Geneva: World Health Organization, available at: http://www.who.int/dietphysicalactivity/factsheet_recommendations/en/index.html Google Scholar
  33. Rothman KJ, Greenland S: Modern Epidemiology. 1998, Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins: New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  34. Chaput JP, Després JP, Bouchard C, Tremblay A: Short sleep duration preferentially increases abdominal adiposity in adults: preliminary evidence. Clinical Obesity. 2011, 1: 141-146.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Baron KG, Reid KJ, Kern AS, Zee PC: Role of sleep timing in caloric intake and BMI. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2011, 19 (7): 1374-1381.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Reiter RJ, Tan DX, Korkmaz A, Ma S: Obesity and metabolic syndrome: association with chronodisruption, sleep deprivation, and melatonin suppression. Ann Med. 2012, 44 (6): 564-577.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Owen N, Healy GN, Matthews CE, Dunstan DW: Too much sitting: the population health science of sedentary behavior. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2010, 38 (3): 105-113.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Steeves JA, Bassett DR, Fitzhugh EC, Raynor HA, Thompson DL: Can sedentary behavior be made more active? a randomized pilot study of TV commercial stepping versus walking. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012, 9: 95-View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Owen N, Sugiyama T, Eakin EE, Gardiner PA, Tremblay MS, Sallis JF: Adults’ sedentary behavior determinants and interventions. Am J Prev Med. 2011, 41 (2): 189-196.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Janssen I, Katzmarzyk PT, Ross R: Waist circumference and not body mass index explains obesity-related health risk. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004, 79 (3): 379-384.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/14/666/prepub

Copyright

© Saleh and Janssen; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.