Outcomes of hepatitis C screening programs targeted at risk groups hidden in the general population: a systematic review
- Freke R Zuure†1Email author,
- Anouk T Urbanus†1, 2,
- Miranda W Langendam3,
- Charles W Helsper4,
- Charlotte HSB van den Berg1, 2,
- Udi Davidovich1 and
- Maria Prins1, 2
© Zuure et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 2 September 2013
Accepted: 10 January 2014
Published: 22 January 2014
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|2 Sep 2013||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|12 Sep 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Eleanor Anderson|
|27 Sep 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Scott Holmberg|
|25 Oct 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Bryce Smith|
|21 Dec 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Freke Zuure|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|21 Dec 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|10 Jan 2014||Editorially accepted|
|22 Jan 2014||Article published||10.1186/1471-2458-14-66|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.