Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Relationship between arsenic skin lesions and the age of natural menopause

  • Fakir Md Yunus1Email author,
  • Musarrat Jabeen Rahman2,
  • Md Zahidul Alam3,
  • Samar Kumar Hore4 and
  • Mahfuzar Rahman5, 6
Contributed equally
BMC Public Health201414:419

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-419

Received: 17 November 2013

Accepted: 22 April 2014

Published: 2 May 2014

Abstract

Background

Chronic exposure to arsenic is associated with neoplastic, cardiovascular, endocrine, neuro-developmental disorders and can have an adverse effect on women’s reproductive health outcomes. This study examined the relationship between arsenic skin lesions (a hallmark sign of chronic arsenic poisoning) and age of natural menopause (final menopausal period) in populations with high levels of arsenic exposure in Bangladesh.

Methods

We compared menopausal age in two groups of women – with and without arsenic skin lesions; and presence of arsenic skin lesions was used as an indicator for chronic arsenic exposure. In a cross-sectional study, a total of 210 participants were randomly identified from two ongoing studies— participants with arsenic skin lesions were identified from an ongoing clinical trial and participants with no arsenic skin lesions were identified from an ongoing cohort study. Mean age of menopause between these two groups were calculated and compared. Multivariable linear regression was used to estimate the relationship between the status of the arsenic skin lesions and age of natural menopause in women.

Results

Women with arsenic skin lesions were 1.5 years younger (p <0.001) at the time of menopause compared to those without arsenic skin lesions. After adjusting with contraceptive use, body mass index, urinary arsenic level and family history of premature menopause, the difference between the groups’ age at menopause was 2.1 years earlier (p <0.001) for respondents with arsenic skin lesions.

Conclusions

The study showed a statistically significant association between chronic exposure to arsenic and age at menopause. Heavily exposed women experienced menopause two years earlier than those with lower or no exposure.

Keywords

Arsenic skin lesions Arsenic exposure Age of Menopause Reproductive period Epidemiology

Background

Chronic inorganic arsenic poisoning has been characterized by cutaneous abnormalities which includes melanosis (hyperpigmentation) and keratosis [1]. Bangladesh retained WHO’s previous guideline value for arsenic concentration in drinking water as a national standard which suggests 50 μg/L or lesser amount as safe [2], although the current WHO guideline value suggests it as 10 μg/L or less [3]. However, in Bangladesh, out of a total population of 164 million, around 22 million people are drinking water with arsenic concentration >50 μg/L, and, of them, 5.6 million people are drinking water with arsenic concentrations even > 200 μg/L [4]. Ground water arsenic contamination is the largest mass poisoning in the history of Bangladesh [5]. Several researchers found that chronic exposure to high concentrations of arsenic causes both carcinogens and non-carcinogenic effects [69]. This effect includes arsenical skin lesions i.e. melanosis and keratosis, vascular diseases, liver and neurotoxicity, chronic cough, diabetes mellitus, adverse pregnancy outcomes, and impaired child development. Arsenic exposure elevates risks of cancer, which persists even decades after exposure has ceased [10].

Previous studies reported the effect of chronic arsenic exposure on reproductive health outcomes in women and noted significant association with adverse pregnancy outcomes such as spontaneous abortion, stillbirth and preterm births. Arsenic toxicity may also increases risks of birth defects [1114]. Other study identified chronic arsenic exposure a female reproductive toxicant, and as an endocrine disruptor, therefore, considered as a major threat for female reproductive health. In animal (rat) experiments, arsenic toxicity deprives oestrogen receptors [15] resulting in interrupted normal activity of organs such as uterine lining, skin, breast tissue, etc. that are responsible for menopause. Oestrogen is responsible for the onset of menstruation in adolescents; however gradual deprivation of receptor eventually results early menopause [16]. In relation to this, another study suggested that arsenic causes delayed menarche [17].

Considering both human and animal studies, this study hypothesized that chronic arsenic exposure characterized by the presence of arsenic skin lesions could have a relationship with the natural menopausal age. This may mean that arsenic associated with early or delayed menopause - in either way, this could be an undesirable outcome. If menopause occurs early, there will be a reduction in reproductive period that means women would likely to experience of cardiovascular diseases, neurological diseases, osteoporosis and psychiatric diseases earlier in their lives [18]. On the other hand, delayed menopause may increase the risk of breast and ovarian cancers due to their prolonged exposure to oestrogen [19].

Methods

Study area and population

The study was conducted in Laksam upazilla of Comilla district, and Araihazar upazilla of Narayangonj district in Bangladesh. Participants with arsenic skin lesions were selected from Laksam upzilla as this area is highly contaminated to arsenic [20]. Participants without arsenic skin lesions were selected from Araihazar, another arsenic contaminated area. Though we collected participants from two different areas, socio-demographic characteristics were similar as both are located in the eastern part of Bangladesh.

Participants with arsenic skin lesions were selected randomly using the database from an ongoing randomized clinical trial "Bangladesh Vit-E and Selenium Trial (BEST)" (ClinicalTrails.gov:NCT00392561) conducted in Laksam, Comilla. This clinical trial aims to determine the supplementation of vitamin E, selenium or their combination that could have beneficial effects on arsenic induced skin cancer. It is a double blind, randomized, placebo-controlled 2 × 2 factorial clinical trial conducted among 7,000 individuals with pre-malignant skin lesions for the prevention of cancers and deaths in Bangladesh. This study enrolled both male and female participants with arsenic skin lesions i.e. melanosis and keratosis within the age limit of 25–65 years. In a recent publication using the baseline data of this clinical trial, associations was found between arsenical skin lesions with common chronic diseases such as hypertension, diabetes, asthma, and peptic ulcer disease [21]. While participants with non-arsenic skin lesions were selected randomly from the ongoing cohort database. This prospective cohort study "Health Effects of Arsenic Longitudinal Study (HEALS)" aims to investigate the intermediate and long-term pre-malignant, malignant and non-malignant health effects of among ~30,000 men and women who were naturally exposed with arsenic through drinking water. This cohort enrolled both male and female participants with a history of drinking water at least three years from the same tube-well within the age limit of 18–75 years. Mean urinary arsenic concentrations of male (140 μg/L) and female (136 μg/L) participants were found in the baseline survey [22]. Both of these databases enrolled participants in 2006 and 2007. Finally, participants for this study were randomly selected based on two basic criteria- one was women with a presence or absence of arsenic skin lesions, and another was women, who had experienced menopause within the last five years (from 2011) with the age limit of 35–55 years.

Considering 80% power, 5% level of significance, Unexposed/Exposed ratio of 1, percent of unexposed with outcome 30 and percent of exposed with outcome 50 using the "OpenEpi" version 2.2 software (Developer: Emory University, Rollins School of Public Health) the sample size was calculated [23]. This yielded a total number of 190 participants, among them 95 were exposed and 95 were unexposed to arsenic. Finally a total 210 eligible women were interviewed to collect relevant information using the "recall" method. Among them, 105 participants had arsenic skin lesions and 105 participants did not. Using the range of eligibility from 35 to 51 years yielded a total of 187 participants for further analysis out of total interviewed 210 participants. Among the selected participants, 95 had arsenic skin lesions and 92 had no arsenic skin lesions.

Data collecting procedure

Detail menopausal history and socio-demographic information was collected using close-ended structured questionnaires consisting of easy-to-understand questions with appropriate response options. The researchers developed the questionnaire and pretested in a neighbouring village similar to the study area.

Ten trained female staffs were recruited for this study as interviewers. They conducted a door-to-door survey to identify the potential participants from the randomly selected list of those databases. All staff were from the study areas and had a very good cultural understanding of the participants. Moreover, interviewers were kept blinded to the objectives of the study. Questionnaires were read and comprehensively explained in front of the potential participants, since they voluntarily accepted to participate in the study, they were then asked to sign or put a thumbprint on the written informed consent paper. For both groups, interviewers back-checked the presence or absence of arsenical skin lesions i.e. melanosis, leucomelanosis and keratosis by full body examination under sunlight. Before the final enrollment into the study, screening was done on under certain criterions such as current menstruation, menopause occurred in less than 1 year (in order to get the final menstrual period) or menopause occurred in more than 5 years, history of using depot injection in last five years, conducted total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH), bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and severe medical conditions. Finally, women were asked to recall their menopausal age. It was assumed that they could recall accurately as it an important life event for women.

Exposure assessment

Arsenic exposure was determined through the presence or absence of arsenic skin lesions. This is because skin lesions are a hallmark sign of chronic arsenic poisoning— hyperkeratosis and melanosis are considered as an indicator of high arsenic exposure [24, 25] whereas urinary arsenic level indicates recent exposure within a few days of the specimen collection [26].

Outcome assessment

Natural menopause was determined according to the World Health Organization (WHO) definition "Permanent cessation of menstruation resulting from the loss of ovarian follicular activity" which corresponds to a single point in time- the final menstrual period (FMP) [27]. This study used the final menstrual period as an outcome variable.

Covariate and other variables

Several studies suggest that a number of factors may affect natural menopausal age, such as smoking, educational attainment, income, marital status, employment, parity, contraceptive use, family history of premature menopause, cancer and history of chemotherapy or radiotherapy and body mass index [18, 2835]. Among these, a few factors such as smoking, parity, marital status, income, use of contraceptive methods, body mass index and family history of premature menopause prevailed among the respondents. Socio-demographic information such as number of children, education, marital status, monthly household income was collected. Other than these, detailed menstrual information such as age of menarche, age of menopause, menstrual regularity and its frequency, use of contraceptives, and family history of premature menopause were also collected. To obtain the family history of premature menopause, participants were asked whether their mother or sister had experienced menopause before the age of 40 years [28]. Information related to arsenic such as duration of exposure to arsenic and urinary arsenic level were taken from two databases of clinical trial and cohort study in the year of 2006–2007. Other factors that may affect the age of menopause such as smoking history and body mass index (BMI) were reviewed retrospectively. BMI was calculated using the standard method (weight in kg/ height in meter2) [36]. The reason behind reviewing information from the mentioned database (2006–2007) was to explore other factors at the time of menopause.

Statistical analysis

Both descriptive and inferential analysis was done by using SPSS software- version 17 (Chicago, IL), and Microsoft Excel (2010). Frequency tables and summary statistics were done to check the missing data, out of range values and to assess distributions of continuous variables, and logic checks were done. Independent-sample t tests were undertaken to compare the mean difference of age of menarche, age of menopause and reproductive period between participants with and without arsenic skin lesions. Reproductive period was calculated by deducting the age of menarche from the age of menopause.

Multivariable linear regressions were done to estimate the relationship between arsenic skin lesions and age of menopause after adjusting for potential confounding variables. Initially univariate analyses such as chi-square tests were done to explore the association between the two groups of participants, their socio-demographic characteristics such as age, occupation, monthly household income, education, marital status, menstrual regularity and frequency (that they experienced in the past) and with the potential factors that affect the age of menopause. These factors, such as smoking, family history of premature menopause, number of children, BMI, use of contraceptives and urinary arsenic level (μg/g creatinine) were included in the initial model. In the final regression model, only significant covariates were included. Categorical variables were entered in the final model as dummy variables.

Ethical review

The study protocol and recruitment procedure (access to the databases) were approved by the Ethical Review Board of the James P Grant School of Public health, BRAC University as per the existing rules.

Results

Participants background, detail menopausal information and association between groups are presented in Table 1. Mean age (±SD) of the respondents was 48.0 (±3.6) years. Mean age (±SD) of menarche, menopause and reproductive age was 14.00 ± 1.36, 44.95 ± 3.35 and 30.94 ± 3.51 respectively. The outcome variable ‘age of menopause’ was normally distributed. Most of the participants were housewife 184 (98.4%). Mean (median) of monthly household income was 9019(8000) BDT (Bangladeshi taka) [116 (103) US$]. The majority of women 114 (61%) had no formal education, 68 (36.4%) women had completed primary education and only 5 (2.7%) completed secondary education. Most (165) were married (88.2%). In terms of menstrual regulation and frequency, most (168) of the participants (89.8%) had experience of regular menstruation (i.e. once a month). Out of total (95) arsenic skin lesions participants, most of them 91(48.7%) had arsenic skin lesions for more than 10 years.
Table 1

Distribution of socio-demographic characteristics and menstrual details of the study population by arsenic skin lesions

Variables

N

%

Arsenic skin lesions

  
   

Yes (N = 95)

No (N = 92)

Mean difference

p

Age (years); Mean ± SD

48.00 ± 3.64

-

47.14 ± 3.48

48.89 ± 3.60

1.74

.001

Occupation

      

Housewife

184

98.4

93

91

-

.22

Daily Labour

2

1.1

2

0

  

Govt Service

1

0.5

0

1

Monthly household

9019 (8000) BDT

-

9476 (7000) BDT

8549 (4000) BDT

927 BDT

.28

Income (BDT, US$); Mean (median)

116 (102) US$

 

122 (90) US$

110 (51) US$

12 US$

 

Education

      

No formal education

114

61.0

53

61

-

.07

Primary completed

68

36.4

41

27

 

Secondary completed

5

2.7

1

4

 

Marital status

      

Single

2

1.1

2

0

-

.51

Married

165

88.2

83

82

  

Widowed

16

8.6

8

8

  

Separated

3

1.6

2

1

  

Divorced

1

0.5

0

1

  

Menstrual regularity

      

Yes

168

89.8

86

82

-

.81

No

19

10.2

9

10

  

Menstrual Frequency

      

Twice a month

2

1.1

1

1

-

.30

Once a month

169

90.4

88

81

  

Once in every 2 months

10

5.3

3

7

Once in every 3 months

4

2.1

3

1

Once in >3 months

2

1.1

0

2

Arsenic skin lesions duration

      

<10 years

4

2.1

4

0

-

-

>10 years

91

48.7

91

0

  

Age of Menarche; Mean ± SD

14.00 ± 1.36

-

14.17 ± 1.37

13.82 ± 1.33

.355

.069

Age of Menopause; Mean ± SD

44.95 ± 3.35

-

44.17 ± 3.28

45.74 ± 3.25

1.568

.001

Reproductive period; Mean ± SD

30.94 ± 3.51

-

29.99 ± 3.31

31.91 ± 3.48

1.914

.001

Abbreviation: SD Standard Deviation.

Among those characteristics, age (p = 0.001) was found significantly lower in with arsenic skin lesions group (47.1 ± 3.5) in comparison to without arsenic skin lesions groups (48.9 ± 3.6). Education (p = 0.07), marital status (p = 0.51), monthly household income (p = 0.28), menstrual regularity (p = 0.81) and frequency (p = 0.30) were not significantly different between groups. Age of menarche was similar (p = 0.06) between two groups, however the menopausal age (p <0.001) and reproductive period (p <0.001) were significantly different between the groups. The result indicates 3.5 months delayed age of menarche and 1.5 years early menopause occurred in arsenic skin lesions participants compared to participants without arsenic skin lesions. Approximately, 1.9 years decrease in reproductive period (p = 0.001) occurred among participants with arsenic skin lesions (29.99 ± 3.31 years) compared to participants without arsenic skin lesions (31.91 ± 3.48 years).

Distribution of potential factors such as smoking, family history of premature menopause, number of children, use of contraceptive methods, urinary arsenic level, and BMI between two groups of participants are presented in Table 2. Participant’s number of children was normally distributed and mean (±SD) was 4.74 ± 1.79. Of the factors, family history of premature menopause (p = 0.001) and use of contraceptives (p = 0.01) were found to be positively associated between the groups. Continuous variables such as body mass index (BMI) were found significantly lower (p = .03) among women with arsenic skin lesions (18.93 ± 3.03) in comparison to women without arsenic skin lesions (19.94 ± 3.48). However, urinary arsenic levels were found significantly higher (p = 0.001) among individuals with arsenic skin lesions (328.01 ± 284.17) in comparison to individuals without arsenic skin lesions (156 ± 193.00).
Table 2

Factors that affect menopausal age

 

Arsenic skin lesions

p

Yes (N = 95)

No (N = 92)

 

Smoking

   

Previous

1

0

1.00

Never

94

92

 

Family history of premature menopause

   

Yes

17

1

.001

No

43

31

 

Don’t know

35

60

Number of Children; Mean ± SD

4.74 ± 1.79

4.91 ± 1.79

.52

Contraceptive Used

   

Yes

47

62

.01

No

48

30

 

Body Mass Index (BMI)

18.93 ± 3.03

19.94 ± 3.48

.03

Urinary As Level (μg/g creatinine)

328.01 ± 284.17

156 ± 193

.001

A multivariable linear regression model was undertaken to adjust all the potential confounders are presented in Table 3. An overall 2.1 years decrease in menopausal age was observed (p < 0.001) in women who had arsenic skin lesions (44.17 ± 3.28) compared to women without arsenic skin lesions (45.74 ± 3.25) after adjusting contraceptive use, urinary arsenic level, body mass index and family history of premature menopause.
Table 3

Relationship between arsenic skin lesions and age of menopause

Model

Coefficientsa

p

CI 95%

 

Lower

Upper

Contraceptive Use Y/N

-.531

.286

-1.510

.449

Arsenic Skin Lesions Y/N

-2.102

.001

-3.207

-.996

Body Mass Index (BMI)

.002

.977

-.145

.150

Urinary Arsenic Level (μg/g creatinine)

.002

.075

.000

.004

Family history of premature menopause (Dummy1- yes)

.321

.717

-1.425

2.067

Family history of premature menopause (Dummy2-Don’t know)

-.296

.571

-1.326

.734

aOutcome Variable: Age of Menopause.

Discussion

We assessed the relationship of chronic arsenic exposure (marked by the arsenic skin lesions) and the natural menopausal age in rural Bangladesh. An overall 3.5 months of delay was observed on the menarcheal age (p = 0.06) among the participants. Even though this was not significant, the direction of the difference observed is consistent with other study [17], who assessed the effect of arsenic on the menarcheal age, and noted a significant delayed onset of menarcheal age among adolescents exposed to arsenic by drinking tube well water in West Bengal, India. We did not have reliable data on their arsenical skin lesions at the time of their menarche, however, in the context of Bangladesh, it can be easily assume that all the participants had been drinking the same arsenic-contaminated water their whole lives as they had never moved from their community since birth. Consistent consumption of the contaminated water gradually led to arsenic poisoning.

Secondly, our finding revealed that chronic arsenic exposure seems to have a relationship with the menopausal age. Comparing the mean age of menopause between two groups (with or without arsenic skin lesions), an overall 1.5 years (p = 0.001) of earlier menopause was observed among the women who had arsenic skin lesions compared to those who did not have arsenic skin lesions. Mean reproductive period was 1.9 years lower among the participants with arsenic skin lesions compared to the participants without arsenic skin lesions. The finding was also similar in the multivariable linear regression analysis. This result suggests that chronic exposure to arsenic, as marked by the presence of skin lesions is associated with early menopause. That means holding all other potential confounders constant, women with arsenic skin lesions would experience 2.1 years early menopause than the women without arsenic skin lesions. Therefore, these women are at higher risk of developing non-communicable diseases, including cardiovascular diseases, neurological diseases, osteoporosis and psychiatric diseases earlier in their lives compared to the women without arsenic skin lesions [18]. On the other hand, this result also indicates that women would be at lower risk of breast and ovarian cancers due to less duration of exposure to oestrogen [19, 37, 38]. The current study is, therefore, important because it sheds light on the relationship of high and long-term arsenic exposure on the age of menopause.

It is not clear how the arsenic metabolism and toxicity process influences the age of natural menopause in human. In rat experiments, arsenic has been identified as a reproductive toxicant and endocrine disruptor, and has been observed to impact the structure and the functions of the uterus in female rat [15]. In humans, arsenic interacts with steroids, particularly oestrogen that may lead to adverse health effects in women. Oestrogen receptors are present in various organs such as uterine lining, skin, breast tissue, bone and blood vessels. If any of these organs are deprived of the substrate, menstrual disorders may result [39]. Arsenic also may cross placental barriers and exposure to this toxicant may occur when the foetus is still within the mother’s womb, although its effects may visibly appear much later in life [37, 39].

In this study, all the participants with or without arsenic skin lesions have high urinary arsenic level, but the arsenic skin lesions group showed significantly (p = .001) higher mean level (328.01 ± 284.17) than their counterpart (156 ± 193.00). Although the urinary arsenic level is consider the most reliable method for measuring arsenic exposure, it is particularly sensitive to recent exposure— within a few days of the specimen collection [26]. Therefore, in this study, we deemed skin lesions as the main criteria for determining arsenic exposure because skin lesions indicates long-term exposure and this long-term arsenic exposure is more important to consider for certain health conditions than recent exposure. Arsenic skin lesions is also considered as the hallmark sign of chronic arsenic poisoning and as an indicator of high arsenic exposure [24, 25].

An important strength of this study was the direct measurement of arsenic skin lesions in each individual. Another positive issue was the adjustment for relevant early menopausal risk factors among the study women such as number of children, family history of premature menopause, use of contraceptives, urinary arsenic level and BMI.As participants (with or without arsenic skin lesions) were selected randomly, selection bias was less likely to occur. One potential limitation of the study is using the self-reported data on the age of menopause and family history of premature menopause, therefore, there is a risk of recall bias through differential misclassification of natural age of menopause among women with arsenic lesions. To avoid differential misclassification of outcomes, we blinded all study staff that includes interviewers and participants assessing for both exposures to outcome and outcome to exposures status. Along with this, we conducted training among the interviewers in order to adhere to the question, and answer the format strictly, with the same degree of questioning on objective measures (hard data) for both with or without arsenic skin lesions participants to reduce interviewer bias. However, we assume that any fluctuation of recalling menopausal age and the family history of premature menopause is likely to affect equally in participants with or without arsenic skin lesions. Another limitation of this study is that bio-markers for arsenic exposure such as hair, nail and blood concentration of arsenic were not measured. As this is a cross-sectional study, temporality between arsenic exposure and menopause cannot be claimed. Prospective cohort study with such population could elucidate this relationship. Although we recruited participants from two different places, as a proxy for socioeconomic status, monthly household income was not significantly different (p = 0.35) among arsenic skin lesions (90 US$)) and without arsenic skin lesions (103 US$) participants.

Conclusions

This study suggests that natural menopausal age has relationship with chronic arsenic exposure (marked by the presence of arsenic skin lesions). The study found menopause occurs earlier when women had arsenic skin lesions. This early experience of menopause results in women having an increased risk of suffering from serious diseases such as cardiovascular, neurological, osteoporosis, and psychiatric diseases. This study also reveals that women with arsenic skin lesions experienced shorter reproductive period in their lifetime. Moreover, evidence connecting high and long-term arsenic exposure to altered age of menopause has strengthened the argument that arsenic directly affects reproductive health. Further research, especially with a larger sample, could elucidate the interaction between arsenic exposure, oestrogen hormone, and the menopausal age. To the best of our knowledge, we did not find any other study that carried out on the relationship between arsenic skin lesions and the age of menopause.

Authors’ information

Fakir Md Yunus: Formerly at James P Grant School of Public Health, BRAC University, 68 Shaheed Tajuddin Ahmed Sarani Mohakhali, Dhaka-1212, Bangladesh.

Notes

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to Dr. Habibul Ahsan, Centre for Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention, The University of Chicago, USA for providing access to the database and field support. The authors would like to thank Md. Mokhlesur Rahman for assisting the data analysis and editing, and Maria A May for reviewing the manuscript. The authors also like to thank all colleagues from James P Grant School of Public Health (JPGSPH) and all staffs from UChicago Research Bangladesh (Ltd).

Funding

Jointly funded by JPGSPH, BRAC University, and UChicago Research Bangladesh (Ltd).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
BRAC Research and Evaluation Division, BRAC Centre
(2)
ICDDR, B – Water, Sanitation and Hygiene Research Group, Center for Communicable Diseases (CCD), Moyeen Center
(3)
Department of Biology, University of Texas at Arlington
(4)
ICDDR, B- Chronic Disease Epidemiology and Genetics Research Group, Centre for Control of Chronic Diseases (CCCD)
(5)
ICDDR, B – Public Health Sciences Division, the Centre for Health and Population Research
(6)
UChicago Research Bangladesh

References

  1. Saha KC: Diagnosis of arsenicosis. J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng. 2003, 38: 255-72. 10.1081/ESE-120016893.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. World Health Organization: Guidelines for Drinking-Water Quality: Health Criteria and other Supporting Information. 1996, Geneva: World Health Organization, 2: 940–949, 2Google Scholar
  3. World Health Organization: Addendum to Volume 2. Guidelines for Drinking-Water Quality: Health Criteria and other Supporting Information. 1998, Geneva: World Health Organization, 281-283. 2Google Scholar
  4. United Nations Children’s Fund: Bangladesh National Drinking Water Quality Survey. 2009, [http://www.unicef.org/bangladesh/knowledgecentre_6868.htm],Google Scholar
  5. Smith AH, Lingas EO, Rahman M: Contamination of drinking-water by arsenic in Bangladesh: a public health emergency. Bull World Health Organ. 2000, 78: 1093-1103.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Mazumder DNG, Haque R, Ghosh N, De BK, Santra A, Chakraborti D, Smith AH: Arsenic in drinking water and the prevalence of respiratory effects in West Bengal, India. Int J Epidemiol. 2000, 29: 1047-1052. 10.1093/ije/29.6.1047.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Rahman A, Vahter M, Ekström E-C, Rahman M, GolamMustafa AHM, Wahed MA, Yunus M, Persson L-A: Association of arsenic exposure during pregnancy with fetal loss and infant death: a cohort study in Bangladesh. Am J Epidemiol. 2007, 165: 1389-96. 10.1093/aje/kwm025.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Wasserman GA, Liu X, Parvez F, Ahsan H, Factor-Litvak P, Kline J, van Geen A, Slavkovich V, LoIacono NJ, Levy D, Cheng Z, Graziano JH: Water arsenic exposure and intellectual function in 6-year-old children in Araihazar, Bangladesh. Environ Health Perspect. 2007, 115 (2): 285-289.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. World Health Organization: Arsenic and Arsenic Compounds. Environmental Health Criteria 224. 2001, 5-7. 2Google Scholar
  10. Ahsan H, Chen Y, Parvez F, Zablotska L, Argos M, Hussain I, Momotaj H, Levy D, Cheng Z, Slavkovich V, van Geen A, Howe GR, Graziano JH: Arsenic exposure from drinking water and risk of premalignant skin lesions in Bangladesh: baseline results from the Health Effects of Arsenic Longitudinal Study. Am J Epidemiol. 2006, 163 (12): 1138-1148. 10.1093/aje/kwj154.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Kwok RK, Kaufmann RB, Jakariya M: Arsenic in drinking-water and reproductive health outcomes: a study of participants in the Bangladesh Integrated Nutrition Programme. J Health Popul Nutr. 2006, 24: 190-205.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Ahmad SA, Sayed MH, Barua S, Khan MH, Faruquee MH, Jalil A, Hadi SA, Talukder HK: Arsenic in drinking water and pregnancy outcomes. Environ Health Perspect. 2001, 109: 629-31. 10.1289/ehp.01109629.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Fei DL, Koestler DC, Li Z, Giambelli C, Sanchez-Mejias A, Gosse JA, Marsit CJ, Karagas MR, Robbins DJ: Association between In Utero arsenic exposure, placental gene expression, and infant birth weight: a US birth cohort study. Environ Health. 2013, 12: 58-10.1186/1476-069X-12-58.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Milton AH, Smith W, Rahman B, Hasan Z, Kulsum U, Dear K, Rakibuddin M, Ali A: Chronic arsenic exposure and adverse pregnancy outcomes in Bangladesh. Epidemiology. 2005, 16: 82-86. 10.1097/01.ede.0000147105.94041.e6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Akram Z, Jalali S, Shami SA, Ahmad L, Batool S, Kalsoom O: Adverse effects of arsenic exposure on uterine function and structure in female rat. Exp Toxicol Pathol. 2010, 62 (4): 451-459. 10.1016/j.etp.2009.07.008.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Al-Azzawi F, Palacios S: Hormonal changes during menopause. Maturitas. 2009, 63 (2): 135-137. 10.1016/j.maturitas.2009.03.009.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Sen J, Chaudhuri ABD: Effect of arsenic on the onset of menarchealage. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 2007, 79: 293-6. 10.1007/s00128-007-9206-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Shuster LT, Rhodes DJ, Gostout BS, Grossardt BR, Rocca WA: Premature menopause or early menopause: long-term health consequences. Maturitas. 2010, 65 (2): 161-166. 10.1016/j.maturitas.2009.08.003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Devita VT, Hellman B, Rosenberg SA: Cancer of the Breast. DeVita, Hellman, and Rosenberg's Cancer: Principles and Practice of Oncology. Volume 2. Edited by: DeVita VT, Lawrence ST, Rosenberg SA. 2008, Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkin, 1608-8Google Scholar
  20. Islam R, Khan I, Hassan SN, McEvoy M, D’Este C, Attia J, Peel R, Sultana M, Akter S, Milton AH: Association between type 2 diabetes and chronic arsenic exposure in drinking water: a cross sectional study in Bangladesh. Environ Health. 2012, 11: 38-10.1186/1476-069X-11-38.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Argos M, Rahman M, Parvez F, Dignam J, Islam T, Quasem I, K Hore S, T Haider A, I patwary T, Rakibuz-Zaman M, Sarwar G, La Porte P, Harjes J, Anton K, Kibriya MG, Jasmine F, Khan R, Kamal M, Shea CR, Yunus M, Baron JA, Ahsan H: Baseline comorbidities in a skin cancer prevention trial in Bangladesh. Eur J Clin Invest. 2013, 43 (6): 579-588. 10.1111/eci.12085.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Ahsan H, Chen Y, Parvez F, Argos M, Hussain AI, Momotaj H, Levy D, van Geen A, Howe G, Graziano J: Health Effects of Arsenic Longitudinal Study (HEALS): description of a multidisciplinary epidemiologic investigation. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2006, 16 (2): 191-205. 10.1038/sj.jea.7500449.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Kelsey JL, Whittemore AS, Evans AS, Thompson WD: Methods in Observational Epidemiology. 2013, Oxford University Press, Table 12–15, 2Google Scholar
  24. Mahata J, Ghosh P, Sarkar JN, Ray K, Natarajan AT, Giri AK: Effect of sodium arsenite on peripheral lymphocytes in vitro: Individual susceptibility among a population exposed to arsenic through the drinking water. Mutagenesis. 2004, 19: 223-229. 10.1093/mutage/geh022.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Rahman M, Axelon O: Arsenic ingestion and health effects: Some epidemiological observation. Proceedings of the Forth International Conference on Arsenic Exposure and Health Effects: 2001; San Diego, California. Edited by: Chappell W, Abernathy CO, Calderon RL. 2001, Oxford: Elsevier Science Ltd, 193-199.Google Scholar
  26. Biggs ML, Kalman DA, Moore LE, Hopenhayn-Rich C, Smith MT, Smith AH: Relationship of urinary arsenic to intake estimates and a biomarker of effect, bladder cell micronuclei. Mutat Res. 1997, 386: 185-195. 10.1016/S1383-5742(97)00012-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. World Health Organization: Report of a WHO Scientific Group. 1996, Geneva: World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser, 866-Google Scholar
  28. Brambilla DJ, McKinlay SM: A prospective study of factors affecting age at menopause. J Clin Epidemiol. 1989, 42: 1031-1039. 10.1016/0895-4356(89)90044-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Gold EB: Factors associated with age at natural menopause in a multiethnic sample of midlife women. Am J Epidemiol. 2001, 153: 865-874. 10.1093/aje/153.9.865.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Hassa H, Tanir HM, Tekin B, Senses T, Oge T, Mutlu FS: Possible factors affecting the age at menopause among women in the central anatolian region of Turkey. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2006, 33: 59-60. 10.1016/j.ogc.2005.12.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Cramer DW, Xu H: Predicting age at menopause. Maturitas. 1996, 23 (3): 319-326. 10.1016/0378-5122(96)00992-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Chiaffarino F, Pelucchi C, Parazzini F, Negri E, Franceschi S, Talamini R, Conti E, Montella M: Reproductive and hormonal factors and ovarian cancer. Ann Oncol. 2001, 12: 337-341. 10.1023/A:1011128408146.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Ed V, Tonkelaar I, van Noord PAH, van der Schouw YT, teVelde ER, Peeters PHM: Oral contraceptive use in relation to age at menopause in the DOM cohort. Hum Reprod. 2001, 16: 1657-1662. 10.1093/humrep/16.8.1657.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Cramer DW, Xu H, Harlow BL: Family history as a predictor of early menopause. Fertil Steril. 1995, 64 (4): 740-745.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Akahoshi M, Soda M, Nakashima E, Tominaga T, Ichimaru S, Seto S, Yano K: The effects of body mass index on age at menopause. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2002, 26 (7): 961-968.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Shetty PS, James WPT: FAO- Food and Nutrition paper 56. Body Mass Index: A Measure of Chronic Energy Deficiency in Adults. 1994, Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United NationsGoogle Scholar
  37. Kelsey JL, Gammon MD, John EM: Reproductive factors and breast cancer. Epidemiol Rev. 1993, 15 (1): 36-47.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Vahter M: Effects of arsenic on maternal and fetal health. Annu Rev Nutr. 2009, 29 (1): 381-399. 10.1146/annurev-nutr-080508-141102.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Myers SL, Lobdell DT, Liu Z, Xia Y, Ren H, Li Y, Kwok RK, Mumford JL, Mendola P: Maternal drinking water arsenic exposure and perinatal outcomes in inner Mongolia, China. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2010, 64 (4): 325-329. 10.1136/jech.2008.084392.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/14/419/prepub

Copyright

© Yunus et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.