Q fever in the Netherlands: public perceptions and behavioral responses in three different epidemiological regions: a follow-up study
© Bults et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 2 July 2013
Accepted: 14 March 2014
Published: 20 March 2014
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|2 Jul 2013||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|20 Oct 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Agnieszka Rychwalska|
|28 Oct 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Renata Welc-Faleciak|
|23 Dec 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Marloes Bults|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|23 Dec 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|13 Jan 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Agnieszka Rychwalska|
|19 Feb 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Marloes Bults|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|19 Feb 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|10 Mar 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Agnieszka Rychwalska|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|14 Mar 2014||Editorially accepted|
|20 Mar 2014||Article published||10.1186/1471-2458-14-263|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.