Vaccination coverage of children aged 12-23 months in Gaziantep, Turkey: comparative results of two studies carried out by lot quality technique: what changed after family medicine?
© Ozcirpici et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 14 June 2013
Accepted: 25 February 2014
Published: 3 March 2014
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|14 Jun 2013||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|12 Nov 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Birgul Ozcirpici|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|12 Nov 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|16 Dec 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Nicola Luigi Bragazzi|
|13 Jan 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Andrea Orsi|
|17 Feb 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Birgul Ozcirpici|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|17 Feb 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|25 Feb 2014||Editorially accepted|
|3 Mar 2014||Article published||10.1186/1471-2458-14-217|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.