Local discrepancies in measles vaccination opportunities: results of population-based surveys in Sub-Saharan Africa
© Grout et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 15 October 2013
Accepted: 31 January 2014
Published: 21 February 2014
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|15 Oct 2013||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|16 Nov 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Olusegun Babaniyi|
|22 Nov 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Yemane Berhane|
|23 Dec 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Lise Grout|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|23 Dec 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|27 Jan 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Lise Grout|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|27 Jan 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|31 Jan 2014||Editorially accepted|
|21 Feb 2014||Article published||10.1186/1471-2458-14-193|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.