Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Local discrepancies in measles vaccination opportunities: results of population-based surveys in Sub-Saharan Africa

  • Lise Grout1Email author,
  • Nolwenn Conan1,
  • Aitana Juan Giner1,
  • Northan Hurtado2,
  • Florence Fermon2,
  • Alexandra N’Goran1,
  • Emmanuel Grellety1,
  • Andrea Minetti1,
  • Klaudia Porten1 and
  • Rebecca F Grais1
BMC Public Health201414:193

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-193

Received: 15 October 2013

Accepted: 31 January 2014

Published: 21 February 2014

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
15 Oct 2013 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
16 Nov 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Olusegun Babaniyi
22 Nov 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Yemane Berhane
23 Dec 2013 Author responded Author comments - Lise Grout
Resubmission - Version 3
23 Dec 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 3
27 Jan 2014 Author responded Author comments - Lise Grout
Resubmission - Version 4
27 Jan 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
31 Jan 2014 Editorially accepted
21 Feb 2014 Article published 10.1186/1471-2458-14-193

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
(2)
Médecins Sans Frontières

Advertisement