Quality of life impairment associated with body dissatisfaction in a general population sample of women
© Mond et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 8 June 2012
Accepted: 25 September 2013
Published: 3 October 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|8 Jun 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|1 Aug 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Toni Liechty|
|20 Aug 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kyle De Young|
|28 Aug 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kelsie Forbush|
|7 Oct 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Jonathan Mond|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|7 Oct 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|5 Nov 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kyle De Young|
|10 Nov 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kelsie Forbush|
|28 Dec 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Jonathan Mond|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|28 Dec 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|28 Jan 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kyle De Young|
|14 Feb 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kelsie Forbush|
|8 May 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Petra Graham|
|16 Aug 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Jonathan Mond|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|16 Aug 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|9 Sep 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Petra Graham|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|25 Sep 2013||Editorially accepted|
|3 Oct 2013||Article published||10.1186/1471-2458-13-920|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.