Early infant diagnosis of HIV in three regions in Tanzania; successes and challenges
© Chiduo et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 30 November 2012
Accepted: 25 September 2013
Published: 2 October 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|30 Nov 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|12 Dec 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Mercy Chiduo|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|12 Dec 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|9 Apr 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Adrian Cook|
|30 Apr 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Lars Åke Persson|
|1 Jun 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Mercy Chiduo|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|1 Jun 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|7 Jun 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Adrian Cook|
|20 Jun 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Lars Åke Persson|
|16 Sep 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Mercy Chiduo|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|16 Sep 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|25 Sep 2013||Editorially accepted|
|2 Oct 2013||Article published||10.1186/1471-2458-13-910|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.