Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of baseline characteristics between children in bottled and municipal water cohorts

From: Burden of childhood diseases and malnutrition in a semi-urban slum in southern India

 

Bottled water

Municipal water

P-value

 

(n=90)

(n=86)

 

Male child

47 (52.1%)

48 (55.8%)

0.633

Nuclear family

43 (47.8%)

40 (46.5%)

0.866

Hindu religion

64 (71.1%)

33 (38.4%)

<0.001

Mean (SD) birth weight (in kg) *

2.9 (0.4)

2.9 (0.5)

0.786

Normal vaginal delivery

77 (85.6%)

77 (89.5%)

0.425

Birth in a hospital/health-care facility

89 (98.9%)

84 (97.7%)

0.614 §

Median (IQR) age (in months) at introduction of supplementary feeding

4.2 (3.1-5.1)

5.2 (3.8-6.0)

<0.001

Median (IQR) family size

5 (4–7)

6 (5–7)

0.043

Presence of siblings

56 (62.2%)

63 (73.3%)

0.118

Mean (SD) age of the mother (in years)

24.3 (3.5)

24.0 (3.3)

0.664 Δ

Education of the head of the household:

No formal education

28 (31.1%)

37 (43.0%)

0.043

Up to primary school (5 years)

14 (15.6%)

21 (24.4%)

 

Middle School (6–8 years)

24 (26.7%)

16 (18.6%)

 

High school and above (>8 years)

24 (26.7%)

12 (14.0%)

 

Education of the mother:

No formal education

13 (14.4%)

26 (30.2%)

0.019

Up to primary school (5 years)

11 (12.2%)

16 (18.6%)

 

Middle School (6–8 years)

26 (28.9%)

20 (23.3%)

 

High school and above (>8 years)

40 (44.4%)

24 (27.9%)

 

Presence of cow in the house

6 (6.7%)

8 (9.3%)

0.518

Presence of any animal in the house

22 (24.4%)

28 (32.6%)

0.233

Living in a “kutcha” house

22 (24.4%)

12 (13.9%)

0.078

Low socio-economic status

65 (72.2%)

52 (60.5%)

0.099

Firewood as the primary cooking mode

39 (43.3%)

51 (59.3%)

0.034

Presence of a functional toilet within the house

52 (62.7%)

50 (61.0%)

0.825

Good household hygiene

12 (13.3%)

35 (40.7%)

<0.001

  1. * Data missing for 9 children; Data missing for 11 children.
  2. Tests of significance: χ2 test; § Fisher’s exact test; Wilcoxon rank sum test; Δ two-tailed t-test.