Disparities in attendance at diabetes self-management education programs after diagnosis in Ontario, Canada: a cohort study
© Cauch-Dudek et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 19 March 2012
Accepted: 24 January 2013
Published: 30 January 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|19 Mar 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|22 Aug 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Nelda Mier|
|26 Aug 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Chiung-Jung (Jo) Wu|
|28 Aug 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Cheryl Lynch|
|25 Sep 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Baiju Shah|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|25 Sep 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|30 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Nelda Mier|
|3 Nov 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Cheryl Lynch|
|5 Nov 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Chiung-Jung (Jo) Wu|
|19 Dec 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Baiju Shah|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|19 Dec 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|24 Jan 2013||Editorially accepted|
|30 Jan 2013||Article published||10.1186/1471-2458-13-85|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.