Development of a comprehensive list of criteria for evaluating consumer education materials on colorectal cancer screening
© Dreier et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 9 April 2013
Accepted: 10 September 2013
Published: 13 September 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|9 Apr 2013||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|16 Apr 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Maren Dreier|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|16 Apr 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|30 May 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Paolo Giorgi Rossi|
|15 Jun 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Annalisa Rosso|
|5 Jul 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - C Escoffery|
|25 Jul 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Maren Dreier|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|25 Jul 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|30 Jul 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Annalisa Rosso|
|1 Aug 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Paolo Giorgi Rossi|
|20 Aug 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - C Escoffery|
|27 Aug 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Maren Dreier|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|27 Aug 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|28 Aug 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Paolo Giorgi Rossi|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|10 Sep 2013||Editorially accepted|
|13 Sep 2013||Article published||10.1186/1471-2458-13-843|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.