Ref. | Components | Questions | Logs researcher | Logs facilitator | Interviews | T1 | Group interviews | T2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recruitment | what procedures were used to interest workers and what are reasons for not participating? | X | ||||||
Reach | attendance of workers in each phase of the participatory approach and its consequent tailored measures | X | X | X | X | |||
Dose delivered | how many steps of the participatory approach were actually delivered by the facilitator? | X | X | |||||
Dose received | how many steps of the participatory approach were actually followed by the worker? | X | X | |||||
Fidelity | was the participatory approach delivered according to protocol? | X | X | X | X | X | ||
[86] | Satisfaction | how satisfied are participants with the participatory approach? | X | X | X | X | ||
Context | what organizational and environmental characteristics affect the intervention? | X | X | X | ||||
[84] | Line manager attitudes and actions | e.g. “My immediate manager has done a lot to involve employees throughout the process” | X | X | ||||
[84] | Exposure to components of the intended intervention | e.g. “The project has made it easier to tackle the changes in the organization” | X | X | ||||
[84] | Employee involvement | e.g. “I had the opportunity to give my views about the change before it was implemented” | X | X | ||||
[84] | Employee readiness for change | e.g. “I looked forward to the changes brought about by the project” | X | X |