Public acceptability of government intervention to change health-related behaviours: a systematic review and narrative synthesis
© Diepeveen et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 13 March 2013
Accepted: 3 July 2013
Published: 15 August 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|13 Mar 2013||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|8 May 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Alan Maryon-Davis|
|15 May 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Tananze Tinati|
|10 Jun 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Theresa Marteau|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|10 Jun 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|3 Jul 2013||Editorially accepted|
|15 Aug 2013||Article published||10.1186/1471-2458-13-756|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.