Skip to main content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Public acceptability of government intervention to change health-related behaviours: a systematic review and narrative synthesis

  • Stephanie Diepeveen1,
  • Tom Ling1,
  • Marc Suhrcke2, 3,
  • Martin Roland3 and
  • Theresa M Marteau3Email author
BMC Public Health201313:756

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-756

Received: 13 March 2013

Accepted: 3 July 2013

Published: 15 August 2013

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting

Original Submission
13 Mar 2013 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
8 May 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Alan Maryon-Davis
15 May 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Tananze Tinati
10 Jun 2013 Author responded Author comments - Theresa Marteau
Resubmission - Version 4
10 Jun 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 4
3 Jul 2013 Editorially accepted
15 Aug 2013 Article published 10.1186/1471-2458-13-756

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

RAND Europe
Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia
Behaviour and Health Research Unit, Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge