Listening to diverse community voices: the tensions of responding to community expectations in developing a male circumcision program for HIV prevention in Papua New Guinea

  • Anna Tynan1Email author,

    Affiliated with

    • Peter S Hill1,

      Affiliated with

      • Angela Kelly2, 3,

        Affiliated with

        • Martha Kupul3,

          Affiliated with

          • Herick Aeno3,

            Affiliated with

            • Richard Naketrumb3,

              Affiliated with

              • Peter Siba2,

                Affiliated with

                • John Kaldor4,

                  Affiliated with

                  • Andrew Vallely2, 4 and

                    Affiliated with

                    • for the Male Circumcision Acceptability and Impact Study (MCAIS) team

                      Affiliated with

                      BMC Public Health201313:749

                      DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-749

                      Received: 16 May 2013

                      Accepted: 6 August 2013

                      Published: 13 August 2013

                      Abstract

                      Background

                      The success of health programs is influenced not only by their acceptability but also their ability to meet and respond to community expectations of service delivery. The World Health Organization (WHO) and the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) have recommended medical male circumcision (MC) as an essential component of comprehensive HIV prevention programs in high burden settings. This study investigated community-level perceptions of MC for HIV prevention in Papua New Guinea (PNG), a setting where diverse traditional and contemporary forms of penile foreskin cutting practices have been described.

                      Methods

                      A multi-method qualitative study was undertaken in four provinces in two stages from 2009 to 2011. A total of 82 in-depth interviews, and 45 focus group discussions were completed during Stage 1. Stage 2 incorporated eight participatory workshops that were an integral part of the research dissemination process to communities. The workshops also provided opportunity to review key themes and consolidate earlier findings as part of the research process. Qualitative data analysis used a grounded theory approach and was facilitated using qualitative data management software.

                      Results

                      A number of diverse considerations for the delivery of MC for HIV prevention in PNG were described, with conflicting views both between and within communities. Key issues included: location of the service, service provider, age eligibility, type of cut, community awareness and potential shame amongst youth. Key to developing appropriate health service delivery models was an appreciation of the differences in expectations and traditions of unique cultural groups in PNG. Establishing strong community coalitions, raising awareness and building trust were seen as integral to success.

                      Conclusions

                      Difficulties exist in the implementation of new programs in a pluralistic society such as PNG, particularly if tensions arise between biomedical knowledge and medico-legal requirements, compared to existing socio-cultural interests. Community participatory approaches offer important opportunities to explore and design culturally safe, specific and accessible programs.

                      Keywords

                      Community participation Male circumcision Penile cutting HIV

                      Background

                      Engaging communities in health programs is influenced by the type of intervention that is going to be rolled out and the interest, aversion or beliefs that a community may already have [1, 2]. Male circumcision and other penile cutting practices have historically been a part of many different ethnic, religious and traditional cultures around the world with considerable variability of age at which circumcision takes place, tradition of the ceremony, and type of cut [39]. Following the recommendation by the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) in 2007 that medical male circumcision (MC) be considered an essential component of comprehensive HIV prevention programs in high burden settings, a number of African countries have embarked on ambitious MC scale-up programs. Many of these high burden countries however, continue to document slow rates of roll out and uptake [10, 11]. Although the acceptability of MC programs has been cited as a key consideration in determining program appropriateness in different contexts [12, 13], further understanding of how to engage communities and facilitate uptake following confirmation of acceptability is integral for ongoing success of any public health program [7, 1416]. In Papua New Guinea (PNG), a country where a significant number of diverse penile cutting practices have been described to be already apart of the socio-cultural fabric of many communities, interest in aligning MC with other HIV intervention programs has been raised [1720]. This study is an exploratory study using interviews and participatory tools to investigate the potentials and challenges of integrating community participation into health service delivery. This research was conducted as part of a multi-disciplinary, community-based research program to investigate the acceptability, epidemiological impact, cost-effectiveness and options for program implementation of MC for HIV prevention in PNG.

                      Papua New Guinea and male circumcision

                      Papua New Guinea has a population that is geographically and culturally diverse with over 700 disparate cultural group and 832 distinctive, mutually unintelligible languages [2125]. In many parts of PNG, particularly in urban settings and regions of high HIV transmission, populations are extremely diverse with individuals often identifying within close family groupings to traditions and language, even when they have gravitated to urban settlements [22, 26]. Recent collaborative research on MC in PNG has indicated that MC would be notionally acceptable and could have an impact on the national epidemic [18, 27]. However concern also exists over health system capacity to deliver such a program, based on the challenges faced by the National Department of Health and partners in delivering even basic health services due to the geographical isolation of populations; limited road infrastructure and rugged terrain; limited and inconsistent funding availability; difficulties establishing, and maintaining appropriate health information systems to monitor service coverage and quality; and diminishing quality of services once established, particularly in rural areas [2831]. Despite this and no formal national policy, a MC program for HIV prevention has already been established in East Sepik Province (ESP) and has shown varying degrees of success [31].

                      The tremendous diversity of socio-cultural contexts, health beliefs and practices in PNG, influences how the objectives and potential benefits of biomedical interventions for HIV prevention are perceived and understood at local level [32]. For example, penile cutting practises in PNG are embedded in customary rituals and contemporary practices (influenced by peers and the socio-cultural environment) [1720]. These practices also encompass various forms of penile cutting that do not commonly involve circumferential cutting or full excision of the foreskin as currently indicated for HIV prevention [9, 17, 19, 20, 33, 34]. With such tremendous geographical constraints and significant linguistic and cultural diversity, a clear understanding of not only the acceptability of new health programs in different communities, but also consideration of how to involve these communities in meaningful and sustainable ways alongside the goals of the health program in the face of political, economic, cultural and epidemiological pressures and health system capacity is warranted [35, 36].

                      Community engagement

                      A community-centred approach to health care delivery involves a balanced consideration of the rights, needs, responsibilities and capacities of all the constituents and stakeholders of a health system with an underlying value of social justice and a focus on improving local communities’ self-reliance and participatory decision-making [37]. Inspired by the original Alma Ata declaration of 1978, community participation is considered one of the pre-requisites for the success of the primary health care movement, and a variety of international and national-level policy documents still cite the importance of engendering this approach [38, 39]. The World Health Report 2008 "Primary Health Care: Now more than ever" has more recently re-ignited the importance of organizing health services around people's needs and expectations [40]. However, employing community participation strategies can be challenging and there exists a range of obstacles in the health sector due to competing social, political and economic interests [41, 42].

                      Key obstacles to meaningful community participation in health service delivery include difficulties defining what community participation should involve and how it should work [2, 39, 4244]; the potential to use the rhetoric of community participation for the legitimacy of political regimes or international organisational interests [41, 45, 46]; power, resource and knowledge asymmetries between policy makers, health staff and communities [2, 47]; inadequate health infrastructures and financial resources to support a community participation programme [2]; inadequate understanding of conflicts of interest, opposing political ideologies and group rivalries characterizing some communities [2, 48]; and the impact that community history, culture and socio-political development has on the community-health service interface and the ability to build trustful relationships in these contexts [39, 4951]. Complications also exist in recognising the extent to which views are held by different community members following failures to identify key community representatives or stakeholders [47]. However, one of the most consistent difficulties to community collaboration in public health programs is the lack of accepted definitions of ‘community’ and ‘participation’ [39, 42, 52].

                      Standardization of the concept of community has been argued to be neither possible nor desirable due to the complexities involved in defining the community and the substantial variability of circumstances and socio-political environments [39]. Communities are an aspect of collective and individual identity which are the result of a web of relations based on socio-cultural, historical, ideological and economic characteristics and not necessarily geographically defined, particularly where there are imbalances in resource availability, cultural heterogeneity, ethnic tensions, or itinerant populations [4246, 48, 53, 54]. Communities incorporate a complex affiliation of people who do not always share a common identity, with many different and overlapping identities within its boundaries that vary over time [2, 42]. These identities may be based on, age; gender; engagement in joint action; ethnicity; social ties, shared experiences; perspectives, expectations, and interests; and socio-economic status [47, 5557].

                      Community participation may be considered on a continuum from the community merely engaging in health programs, to participating directly in the development and maintenance of a program, to complete empowerment and ownership of health programs [39, 58, 59]. Successful community participation should be viewed as a process and not an intervention and, it has been advocated that communities should be given the opportunity to define their idea of ‘participation’ [2, 48, 49]. This definition, must also be considered within the influence of political philosophies, community and stakeholder perceptions of existing and expected levels of participation, community priorities and interests, the acceptability of the implementation of participatory interventions and health program expectations [2, 39, 54]. Community participation programmes should therefore remain dynamic and responsive to changing needs [2, 22, 60].

                      The importance of understanding communities and their relationships to the health system and the health program that is being delivered should not be underestimated and can play an essential role in delivering services. In addition to community acceptability, understanding community-level meanings and potential attitudes and inclinations towards different service delivery models is essential, particularly when evidence of similar pre-existing practices already exist within the socio-cultural environment. The aim of our study was therefore to explore community opinions regarding service delivery models for the implementation of MC for HIV prevention in PNG and how participatory methods may assist.

                      Methods

                      Study design

                      A multi-method qualitative study was undertaken in four provinces in PNG: National Capital District (NCD); Eastern Highlands Province (EHP); East Sepik Province (ESP); and West New Britain Province (WNBP). The research was conducted in two stages from 2009 until 2011. In each of the study sites, focus group discussions (FGDs) and in-depth interviews (IDIs) were conducted during stage 1; and participatory community workshops conducted in stage 2.

                      Study sites

                      Study sites were selected during a National Stakeholders Workshop held in Port Moresby in May 2008 based on representation of socially and geographically diverse regions of the country (Figure  1). Approval from key local authorities, chiefs and other stakeholders were obtained prior to the arrival of the research team in each study location. In each province, the research team conducted research amongst multiple cultural and language groups highlighting the complexity of pluralistic communities in each setting.
                      http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2458-13-749/MediaObjects/12889_2013_5682_Fig1_HTML.jpg
                      Figure 1

                      Map of Papua New Guinea with study provinces highlighted.

                      Port Moresby, NCD was selected because it is the national capital with a diversity of people coming from all regions of the country. Informal urban settlements are a feature of Port Moresby and have been defined as groups of households in localities and in conditions that contravene the laws and regulations of the state [61]. These settlements are characterised by diverse cultural groups, haphazard housing, poor access to basic amenities, and at least some temporary housing [61, 62].

                      Eastern Highlands Province (EHP) is considered a traditionally non-penile cutting cultural area. It is linked to other areas of the country through the Highlands Highway, which serves as one of the country’s primary economic transport routes, linking coastal ports in Morobe and Madang Provinces with major towns and other destinations in the Highlands. The highway is the main conduit for people travelling and migrating from different areas of PNG. It has also been considered a potential channel for the transmission of STIs and HIV between provinces that are serviced by the road [63].

                      The Sepik river basin (which includes East Sepik Province) is linguistically the most complex area in PNG with about 200 spoken languages [64]. Research was undertaken in a number of sites within East Sepik Province (ESP) including in the provincial capital and several regional centers surrounding the capital (including Angoram and Maprik). East Sepik Province has a history of traditional penile cutting practices, although recent community studies suggest that these practices have been discontinued in many areas [17, 65, 66]. Currently there is a medical MC program for HIV prevention operating in ESP since 2006 that also includes community outreach.

                      West New Britain Province (WNBP) also has a history of traditional penile cutting practices [6569], and recent research indicates that these practices continue in some communities [17, 18].

                      Study participants

                      In order to ensure effective representation and to avoid misunderstandings and distrust developing between potential participants and external researchers, extensive community consultation was carried out with key stakeholders and the findings triangulated with previous research on penile cutting practices in PNG [57]. Community consultation and reflection also allowed for insight into existence of community definitions relevant to the research question including those who engaged in penile cutting practices, age definition (youth were typically considered unmarried or <25years), gender perceptions, and differing community histories. An iterative, purposive sampling technique was used to identify potential study participants following initial contact and interviews with key local stakeholders and community members at each study location in both stage 1 and 2.

                      Data collection

                      In stage 1, a total of 272 men and 210 women (N=482) participated in 82 IDIs, and 45 FGDs that were conducted by experienced locally-based fieldworkers trained in qualitative data collection methods and fluent in both Tok Pisin (a lingua franca of PNG) and English in the four study locations (Table  1). The data collection processes have previously been described [17, 18, 70]. In brief, interview guides were developed that enabled interviewers to explore perceptions and preferences for service delivery, should the Government of PNG decide to go ahead in implementing a MC program for HIV prevention.
                      Table 1

                      Summary of interviews, focus group discussions and workshops conducted

                      Stage 1

                       

                      ESP

                      EHP

                      WNBP

                      NCD

                      Total

                      Women

                           

                      Focus group discussions

                      7

                      4

                      5

                      5

                      21

                      In-depth interviews

                      3

                      2

                      3

                      10

                      18

                      Men

                           

                      Focus group discussions

                      4

                      5

                      8

                      8

                      25

                      In-depth interviews

                      16

                      7

                      3

                      10

                      36

                      Stage 2

                       

                      ESP

                      EHP

                      WNBP

                      NCD

                      Total

                      Community women workshop (older)

                      -

                      1

                      -

                      -

                      1

                      Community women workshop (youth)

                      1

                      1

                      -

                      -

                      2

                      Community men workshop

                      1

                      1

                      -

                      -

                      2

                      Community leader workshop (lay)*

                      -

                      1

                      -

                      -

                      1

                      Community leader workshop (professional)**

                      1

                      1

                      -

                      -

                      2

                      Total number of workshops

                          

                      8

                      *Other general community leaders including youth leaders, women’s group leaders.

                      ** Professional staff from health facilities, department of health or other related public services.

                      In Stage 2, eight community feedback workshops were conducted in areas previously visited during Stage 1, to review key themes, consolidate earlier findings and assist with dissemination of research back to study communities (Figure  2). Due to logistical and security reasons, community workshops were conducted in EHP and ESP only, with other channels of dissemination being used in WNB and NCD e.g. media releases, stakeholder workshops, and presentations at annual medical symposia of the PNG Medical Society, and at the National Policy Forum on Male Circumcision for HIV Prevention, held in Port Moresby in November 2011 [71, 72]. Five workshops were completed with community members and three workshops completed with community leaders and local health care professionals. Community workshops utilised a variety of participatory research tools successfully employed by the research team in earlier studies [57, 73, 74], such as listing, scoring and ranking to highlight community-level priorities for future service delivery. Participants were asked to list considerations for implementing a MC program in their communities and to rank the issues from least to most important. Ranking was completed by either voting with stones or in-depth discussions until consensus was obtained (Figure  3). In the workshop conducted with community leaders in ESP, the group chose to consider the current MC program and to list facilitators and barriers to current service delivery.
                      http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2458-13-749/MediaObjects/12889_2013_5682_Fig2_HTML.jpg
                      Figure 2

                      Participatory workshop on service delivery models for MC for HIV prevention.

                      http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2458-13-749/MediaObjects/12889_2013_5682_Fig3_HTML.jpg
                      Figure 3

                      Example of an activity completed during participatory workshops.

                      Data analysis

                      All FGDs and interviews in Stage 1 were digitally recorded, transcribed verbatim and where necessary translated from Tok Pisin to English, before undergoing thematic analysis which was carried out by five researchers based at the PNG Institute of Medical Research (IMR) in Goroka. Accuracy and equivalency of translations were cross checked by two bilingual translators. Any incongruities were then negotiated between the two bilingual translators. Thematic analysis was carried out at the end of stage 1 and stage 2. In stage 1 a codebook was developed and all interviews were double coded. In cases of discrepancy in coding a third researcher coded the selected text in question. Themes identified in Stage 1 provided the grounding for structuring the workshops in Stage 2. In Stage 2, qualitative analysis of posters generated from workshop activities along with field notes written during participatory workshops was conducted and organised into themes. Finally, all data was subjected to additional thematic analysis that was facilitated by qualitative data management software (NVivo 8; QSR International Pty Ltd, Australia). Qualitative data analysis focused on comparing and contrasting specific themes as they occurred including the barriers to service delivery, preference to certain attributes of the service delivery models, and insights into unique community perceptions.

                      Ethical considerations

                      Ethical approval was granted in PNG by the Institutional Review Board of the PNG Institute of Medical Research, the National AIDS Council Research Advisory Committee and the Medical Research Advisory Committee of the National Department of Health. In Australia, ethics approval was provided by the Human Research Ethics Committees of the University of New South Wales and the University of Queensland. The purpose of FGDs, IDIs and participatory workshops were explained to study participants by a trained field worker. All those who participated in an FGD or IDI provided written informed consent prior to the start of the interview (participants who were unable to read or write provided a witnessed thumbprint). For those taking part in community workshops, verbal consent was obtained prior to commencing the activity. This research adheres to the qualitative research review guidelines (RATS).

                      Results

                      There was considerable diversity in community opinions of how a future MC program for HIV prevention should be implemented in PNG. Clear distinction of program design requirements existed between traditional penile cutting communities and non-traditional penile cutting communities. However, a number of often conflicting suggestions were offered within communities with regard to service location (community-based vs. hospital based delivery); people providing the service (traditional and/or local (contemporary) cutters vs. trained health workers); cost (free vs. fee-based service); and target population strategy (infants and children vs. young men or adults) (Table  2). These divergences in opinion were embedded in gender roles, socio-cultural contexts and division among age groups. While all participants highlighted the need to ensure implementation of a ‘safe’ procedure, detailing what this would entail, and how much health system involvement was needed varied.
                      Table 2

                      Preferred service delivery options for a male circumcision program for HIV prevention

                      Traditional penile-cutting communities

                      Location

                      Service provider

                      Health facility

                      Traditional house

                      Health worker

                      Traditional cutter

                      To increase safety and precision of cut

                      To preserve culture.

                      Health worker could be involved in traditional ceremony as a guest at traditional house

                      If provided with skills and resources from the government

                      Initial procedure completed at health facility but all follow up and medication completed in traditional ways

                      To strengthen the community

                      Health worker to complete in health facility

                      To increase ease of access for some communities

                      Completed at health facility but followed up with customary celebrations

                      For the community to have more control of program.

                        

                      For poor families who can’t afford customary celebrations.

                      Because it defined customary practice

                        
                       

                      Completed only at traditional house to respect custom

                        
                       

                      For wealthy families to promote social standing

                        

                      Financing

                      Target population

                      Free

                      Payment

                       

                      Should be free if completed by government

                      For traditional purposes only

                      > 10 years as per traditional custom

                      Should be free if completed by government

                      In kind or in gratitude, a part of cultural celebration

                      School age

                      Communities that do not engage in traditional penile cutting

                      Location

                      Service provider

                      Health facility

                      Community location

                      Health worker

                      Peer/non-health worker

                      At health facility to increase safety of procedure

                      Complete in secret community location

                      Health worker to increase safety

                      Use of local cutter due to loss of potential income if Health worker only involved

                      At health facility but it would need to be discrete

                      For ease of access

                      Health worker from outside community to increase secrecy and safety

                      Accredited local cutter to alleviate human resource burden on health system

                      Not at major hospital as it is too public

                      Going to health facility can be expensive and time consuming

                      Male health worker as it would save embarrassment for patient and female health worker

                       

                      Community outreach program to aid post level and if possible village level to assist in mitigating access issues for rural people

                         

                      Financing

                      Target population

                      Free

                      Payment

                      < 5 years

                      >10 years

                      Because the government was promoting it

                      To increase accountability for action

                      Because many children are exposed to sex early

                      Around time of sexual debut

                      A cost would be a barrier to service uptake

                      In kind or in gratitude

                      Other countries circumcise babies

                      Older because boys they would be stronger physically and mentally to handle pain and procedure

                      Young men would not have access to cash due to poor employment options

                        

                      Older so that children would have a choice

                         

                      If too high then this may impact on uptake

                      Diversity in communities where traditional forms of penile cutting are practiced

                      Interest in a medical MC program to be linked to traditional practices and completed alongside traditional ceremony in a “haus man” or “haus boi” (a house traditionally designated for the exclusive use of men/male youth and often the place where initiation takes place) was evident in ESP and WNBP communities. However, opinion on how this was to be incorporated differed, particularly between men and women in WNBP communities and male youth and other groups in ESP. These distinctions appeared to be influenced by the socio-cultural and political histories of the area.

                      East Sepik province

                      Who should provide the service and where should it be located?
                      East Sepik Province has a history of traditional penile cutting practices and a current medical MC program for HIV prevention operating from the main hospital in Wewak since 2006. Most participants agreed that the procedure should be completed by a health worker (HW) in a health facility, including men who had previous experience of penile cutting.

                      I just heard it now that they cut it in the health facility and I feel that it’s more safe and good to go to the health facility to get cut. They will cut it properly, in the right way. The doctor can also check you properly and you can get good advice regarding your skin. Man with penile alteration, In-depth Interview, ESP

                      Women also tended to agree that the procedure be completed in a health facility.

                      I think that health facilities are better because they cut and treat it properly. To cut elsewhere or in the bush like custom ways is not good because they use bamboo and the same blades to cut - different diseases can be transmitted then. Young women focus group discussion, ESP

                      However, for many men, incorporating a medical MC program within the ‘haus boi’ tradition would also be a way of maintaining the Sepik culture, a sentiment that was strongly held by local government stakeholders and community leaders.

                      I will support it because the male children must stay in the ways of a male child. They will cut the skin, stay in the ‘haus boi’ and they will stay to strengthen the community. Man, In-depth Interview ESP

                      During the workshops, male youth from settlement areas in Wewak suggested their preferred service model would be medical intervention for the initial cut, followed by customary practices and wound care (using traditional medicines) during the healing period (Table  3). Reasons provided for this preference was due to concerns about the costs involved in accessing health facilities and medicines. Other men suggested that the community have more control over the program with the health system assisting as they required. A few male youths in ESP advised they would prefer the training of traditional cutters to implement the program entirely.

                      Yes if they (the government) can provide the materials to cut like blades, medicines, gauze and give some small guidelines to follow regarding health and safety, it will be alright for these doctors (traditional cutters) in the village to cut. Young man, In-depth Interview, ESP

                      Table 3

                      Summary of workshops from community groups

                      East Sepik Province workshops

                      Community leaders workshop Wewak n= 5

                      Review of current male circumcision program Advantages and Disadvantages

                      Advantages

                      Disadvantages/challenges

                      1 Maintains the Sepik culture: (particularly if done in traditional way)

                      Inadequate materials for the procedure so there is a tendency of reusing the same blades and materials if done in haus man

                      2 Influx of people for circumcision due to:

                      Scarce human resources

                      a Prevention of STI (HIV)

                      Shortage of testing materials

                      b Prevention of cervical cancer

                      Funds

                      c Reduction of STI/HIV cases

                      Lack of information

                      3 Entry point to VCT

                      Having multiple sexual partners post circumcision

                      4 Referrals made to access proper medical services

                      5 Behavioral change due to increased involvement in VCT

                      Young women Wewak n=6

                      Factor

                      Consensus vote

                      Other description

                      Age

                      > 5 years

                      Children greater than 5 years are stronger (have higher levels of iron)

                      11 to early teens are able to understand MC and care for themselves

                      Cost

                      Free

                      Because it is for the prevention of HIV

                      Could be barrier to service delivery

                      Costs already incurred for transport to health facility

                      Who should cut

                      Health Worker or Traditional cutter (if experienced)

                      Health worker because they have medical expertise

                      Traditional cutter would need training, but could offer treatment with traditional medicine

                      Awareness

                      MC program in ESP not well known to women

                      Young men Wewak n=8

                      Factor

                      Consensus vote

                      Other descriptions

                      Awareness

                      For everyone

                      Radio, television, peer group communication, newspaper, counsellor, general community awareness

                      Health and hygiene, to prevent HIV, for custom purposes

                      Age

                      – 8 years

                       

                      Location

                      Range of options

                      Health facility, Haus man or private doctor/traditional cutter

                      Treatment

                      Combined health facility and traditional (to reduce costs)

                      Health Facility for initial injections, medication, iodine and dressings

                      Traditional treatment for any follow up needs

                      Types of cut

                      Circumferential cut and Dorsal Slit

                      Both straight cut (dorsal slit or longitudinal incision only) and round cut (full circumferential cut) should be available

                      Access

                      People should have choice

                      Service brought to villages

                      Build health facility closer to rural people

                      Cutter

                      Health worker or traditional cutter

                      Either male or female

                      Cost

                      Free

                       

                      Eastern Highland Province workshops

                      Older women`s group (Village) n=9

                      Factors

                      Consensus vote

                      Other details

                      Age

                      >15years

                       

                      Cost

                      Free

                       

                      Location

                      In Village

                       

                      Service delivery barriers

                      Shame (to go to health facility) and Cost

                      Cost was seen as most significant barrier

                      Who should cut

                      Health worker

                       

                      Young women`s group (Village) n=12

                      Factors

                      Consensus vote

                      Other details

                      Location

                      Aid post

                      Prefer aid post over hospital due to ease of access

                      Age

                      >13 years

                      Practitioner

                      Health worker who is unknown

                      Cost

                      Free

                      Considered most important issue

                      Men`s group (Village) n=20

                      Factors

                      Consensus vote

                      Other details

                      Location

                      In Village

                      Build a House in the Community for procedure

                      Who should cut

                      Local cutters

                      To feel more comfortable

                      Continued employment of local cutter

                      Awareness

                      For entire community

                       

                      Timing

                      Regular service

                       

                      Community leaders (Lay) group Goroka n=7

                      Factors

                      Consensus vote

                      Other details

                      Awareness

                      Explanation of what MC is to everyone

                      To make informed decision

                      Use of community level representative appointed locally to be present in the community at all times, understands local language, to assist in breaking down shame.

                      Allowance for rep

                      Location

                      Aid post

                      To avoid all complications male circumcision must not be done outside of health facility

                      Urban Clinic

                      Health facilities must be equipped with proper equipment

                      Hospital

                      Cutter

                      Health Care worker only

                      Doctors and nurses (must be trained certified medical practitioner)

                      Gender Sensitive for older population (i.e. male HW only)

                      Age

                      >10years

                      Foreskin easier to cut

                      Old enough to care for the treated wound

                      Preparation for prevention of HIV before sexual debut

                      Cost

                      Free

                      Free of charge for both procedure and medication because

                      -It is a government HIV strategy

                        

                      -Higher attendance and number of males circumcised

                      Specialised community leaders Goroka (health workers, prison officers, department of health) n=11

                      Factors

                      Consensus vote

                      Other details

                      1. Location/access

                      Local service

                       

                      2. Who will cut

                      Health worker or local cutter (with training)

                      Limited human resources available

                      Male only

                       

                      3. Age

                      > 10 years (before sexually active)

                      ∙Service should be available to a wide range of ages

                      ∙Concern over consent and compliance

                      4. Cost

                      Free

                      ∙Incentives for men (bus fare/tea or coffee)

                      ∙Incentive for local cutter or CHW to recruit

                      5. Training

                      Relevant to PNG, Supervisor medical officer only

                      6. Compensation

                      Potential for legal action due to complications

                       

                      Would impact on community acceptance of program

                      Awareness
                      Knowledge of MC within ESP, varied considerably by gender and was a concern for both men and women. For example, despite an adult medical MC program for HIV prevention already established in Wewak, men from Wewak settlement areas explained that although they had heard of the program they still thought raising awareness was an important issue:

                      I want more awareness to be done and those men like me who have already been circumcised must go into their communities and inform their friends and relatives so that they can feel that it is good to go and have a complete circumcision [full circumferential cut] done. Man, focus group discussion, ESP

                      In contrast, women from ESP who participated in both the participatory workshops in Wewak and FGDs in their communities had very limited understanding both of the MC program in ESP, and of penile cutting practices among men in their communities and also raised the importance of awareness. Conversely, in WNBP, women seemed to have a clear understanding of traditional penile cutting practices within their communities as they played significant roles in the celebrations. Further details are discussed below.

                      West New Britain Province

                      Where should the program be located?
                      In WNBP, where traditional penile cutting is still widely practiced, there was strong support for male circumcision to be completed by health worker and incorporated within traditional rituals and observances. The location of the ceremony celebration in the haus boi held significant cultural meaning to both men and women, and seemed to define and distinguish customary practices. However, men and women were divided about the location of where the procedure should take place in order to align the procedure with traditional culture. Suggestions were made by men that the procedure could be done in a health facility but that all of the other cultural ceremony should be completed in the haus man.

                      …the government must know, all the men must be circumcised. Like in the health facility or such. The government must know and talk strongly about circumcision. We [my tribe] will also support it however it must go through custom. If the government can acknowledge and strengthen our custom work with something, or it can fund with some money to erect a house for circumcision where we will buy things like blade cutter or such things to put in there. Later, we will go through initiation customarily. All the boys will go into the house for circumcision. Man, in-depth interview, WNBP.

                      Women in these traditionally circumcising communities acknowledged that the role they played in circumcision rituals was an important part of their meaning and contribution to the community and they were reluctant to consider incorporating a health facility visit into these traditions.

                      The government wants to do it in the health facility, however, we the mothers sitting together here have discussed and we want to go about it the customary way. We want to build a “haus boi” here where doctors can come here and cut children’s foreskin here. They have to come here so when they cut them, there will be special mothers who will take care of them. The doctor can come and give injection and such in the “haus boi” which will have custom to it. After six days, we and the doctors who came and cut the children’s foreskin will get togather and make a feast and have food with these children and later they can go. This is what we mothers in this community think. If they want to cut them in the health facility, we will think otherwise. It is like the government has no respect for our custom. It is just cutting the foreskin of men and there is no custom to it because like we said already, circumcision is a big thing. The custom we follow here is that we kill many pigs after they cut children’s foreskin. That is why we have this idea. Woman, Focus Group Discussion, WNBP

                      Impact of traditional payments on location
                      The cultural expectation of payments was also suggested to impact on preferred models of service delivery. Some respondents in WNBP felt that obligations surrounding customary circumcision could determine service uptake depending on economic position. For example, preference for a particular location may depend on the wealth of a family in traditional cutting societies. A poor family may prefer to go to a health facility as they then could complete the procedure in secrecy, fulfilling customary requirements in part whilst avoiding the cost of celebrations associated with traditional cutting events. A rich family would be able to afford the cultural celebrations and most likely prefer that the procedure be conducted in the community. As one woman described:

                      To cut children in the health facility, this depends on individuals. A man who is poor can go to the health facility, to hide and do it. A man who is rich can do it in the village. Woman, Focus Group Discussion, WNBP

                      Engaging in celebrations was a way of consolidating a family’s place within local society, as one informant described:

                      It’s an experience and an opportunity where ah for one, family prestige that I was able to go. People who don’t have pigs will not go through that process for instance. It shows that my people have been working and can be counted on as a member of the community to supply food and pigs. It is the pride for each family to see their son go through that process and I feel proud that I went through the process. Because it’s a requirement placed on families in the community that boys go through the process, its celebrated and when I reached that stage I went to an adulthood stage where you know they slaughter pigs and this time with big* people like me. Man, In-depth Interview, WNBP

                      (*“Big Man” is a term commonly used to indicate a title of status or leadership).

                      Diversity in communities where traditional forms of penile cutting are not carried out

                      Guaranteeing confidentiality and discretion

                      Issues of guaranteeing confidentiality and discretion for young men were raised in traditionally cutting communities, however, this issue seemed more prevalent in urban areas and communities where traditional penile cutting was not a part of their cultural backgrounds. In the non-traditionally cutting communities and urban areas of NCD and EHP, respondents reported that the program would need to address the reluctance of men, particularly youth, accessing the health system via the usual channels. Suggestions provided for this reluctance included the young men’s general reserve about discussing matters pertaining to sexual health; potential discrimination at formal health settings due to cultural background or practices; anticipated attitudes of health workers (HWs) towards the practice; economic burden in accessing a health facility; or the risk of looking weak in front of peers.

                      Sometimes, if the small boys hear that the men are removing their penis foreskin, they will make fun and call them “Papa Kela” (‘bald man’ in tok pisin). Young Women, Focus Group Discussion, NCD

                      Participants raised a number of considerations that needed to be overcome to accommodate issues of shame and reluctance to participate in a program based in a formal health setting. To accommodate the need for discretion some considered that major hospitals would actually increase secrecy for the young men whilst others suggested that hospitals were too public and that many boys would be reluctant to attend, and therefore resort to doing it themselves. Others advised that the procedure should be completed at community level, but in secrecy; for example, doctors should attend villages upon appointment:

                      I think it’s good to come to the village and do circumcision because many men in the village are embarrassed to go to the health facility. Young man, Focus Group Discussion, EHP

                      Who should do the cutting?

                      Issues around privacy and familiarity of the HW also dictated preferred service provider with many suggesting that it should be someone who was unknown to the patient. For a few, the preference was for a male HW due to potential issues of embarrassment for the patient. One young man also described that issue of embarrassment may also extend to a female practitioner:

                      I think it will be good if a male doctor cuts it because if a female doctor cuts it, the patient will be embarrassed. When afraid she [the female doctor] might make a wrong cut. Young man, focus group discussion, EHP

                      Having a man perform the procedure would also guarantee secrecy according to some:

                      The government must set it in a centre where only the males know. Only the males will know and the staff too must get the mature men’s’ opinion bit by bit and then will advise them and say this is this so will bring them to a session, secretly circumcising them. Young man, Focus Group Discussion, EHP

                      For others, issues over cultural expectation would need to be accommodated and would dictate who would be able to perform the procedure:

                      Well of course, guys or boys they would feel comfortable because in some cultures males are dominant so if a female touches it [penis], its disrespect you know. Man, focus group discussion, NCD

                      Men and women differed in their opinion as to whether a HW or a local cutter should carry out the procedure. In EHP communities, women felt that a HW from outside the community who was unknown to them would be most appropriate, in order to prevent embarrassment and improve service uptake (Table  3). In contrast, men preferred a local cutter, and highlighted the potential loss of income if HWs exclusively delivered this service. The training of local cutters was also supported by key stakeholders and HWs who felt that frontline health staff were already under pressure and the use of local cutters could alleviate some of their work burden.

                      Age and consent

                      In EHP, there was also much debate about the age of the child and the need to obtain informed consent. Some participants felt MC should be carried out before sexual debut:

                      They must start circumcising from 3 years old upwards because these days, young children watch a lot of movies and they see men and women sleeping together in the movies and their brains are matured. Young man focus group discussion, EHP

                      Circumcision of younger children was also a preference for men in NCD with some indicating that babies should be considered.

                      The Europeans do it when the baby is born, maybe one year old or two year old or six months or something like that… so maybe it’s good for us Papua New Guineans to stand up and do like that too in our country and community. Man, focus group discussion, NCD

                      Women in both EHP and NCD, however, suggested the target age group should be much older. For example women from a village in EHP suggested that MC be offered to youth aged 13 years and above (Table  3). Women reasoned that an older age would mean that the boy was stronger physically and mentally to withstand the procedure. Women in NCD advised that MC should be carried out on boys aged 15 – 20 years because younger than that, they would have fear of pain.

                      A common concern amongst all participants in EHP and NCD was consent, and particularly how this would dictate an appropriate target age group for the intervention. For example, consent and compliance was raised as an issue in EHP during the participatory workshops. However, participants were divided over whether it was ethical for parents to provide consent for MC for younger children (<10years), suggesting that it would be better to wait until the boys could make a choice and provide consent themselves. Others felt if the target age were raised to >13 years and boys were allowed to make the choice themselves this would impact on uptake because boys would be more likely to decide not to have the procedure. This lead to intense debate about the priority for a HIV prevention program and the need to ensure that boys would be ethically encourage to come for MC. This issue of choice was a common concern amongst a number of participants

                      I believe that people should be given the choice I mean whether or not to get circumcised. Because although circumcision comes out as a prevention method, it should not be forced on to other people because different people have different believes and their rights have to be respected. Man, Focus Group Discussion, NCD

                      Issues of commonality amongst all participants

                      A number of common themes were identified amongst both traditionally cutting and non-traditionally cutting communities including flexibility of type of cut offered, cost, awareness and, community collaboration. For type of cut, for example, despite uncertainty around the protective efficacy of the dorsal slit (longitudinal cut of foreskin only) for HIV prevention, both traditionally circumcising communities and traditionally non-circumcising communities reported preference for it, with many participants suggesting that both the dorsal slit and full circumferential cut options be made available.

                      Cost was also a key consideration and of concern to all participants, with the consensus that MC should be provided for free in any future service. For traditionally circumcising communities, differentiation was made between cost involved as part of traditional celebrations (which was considered integral to the practices) and costs incurred due to fees involved in accessing a health program.

                      I want this service to be free. When it’s free all the men will be happy to go. Young man in-depth interview, EHP

                      Some argued that because it was being encouraged by the government for the prevention of HIV, then the onus of payment should be on the government.

                      I would expect the government to carry out this circumcision for free because the government should be the main people trying to stop the expansion of HIV and AIDS. Man, focus group discussion, NCD

                      Participants also raised concerns about cost as a potential barrier to service uptake if not considered thoughtfully. For example, cost of the service and the associated costs of access to services were identified as significant barriers, particularly in remote communities.

                      …it won’t be good if you do it in towns only. This operation should be done in rural areas… People in the village find it hard to come into town because it is costly for them. Man, in-depth interview, ESP

                      Even in urban settings, men acknowledged that unemployment was prevalent and that most young men would not readily have access to cash. The convenience of performing the procedure outside a health facility was a more desirable option for a few respondents, as one man who had a penile cut outside a health facility explained:

                      …going to the health facility [to get cut] is expensive…one, it’s going to take time to circumcise. Two there is pay, [fee] and it’s very expensive…. Man, In-depth Interview NCD

                      Ensuring community collaboration

                      The highest priority identified by all participants in the in-depth interviews, workshops and focus group discussions for a successful future MC program was the need for community awareness. Respondents emphasized the need for clear communication about the MC program to everyone. In particular it was considered that women must be well informed about the advantages and disadvantages of MC as they will be primarily responsible for providing consent for their children to undergo the procedure.

                      Regarding the awareness, when they make awareness, they must tell the women too regarding circumcision. Young man, focus group discussion, EHP

                      The importance of fostering good community relationships was seen of upmost importance with a need to develop a strong relationship with the community, share food and create mutual respect, essential for program success. This would allow the community to feel more a part of and at ease with what was happening. The person chosen to deliver the awareness would also be integral to the success of the program. As one young man from EHP explained:

                      Village people don’t trust just anybody that comes and talks. They trust their own squad, one age group. So for this sort of education, when a villager gives it [education] to his kind, they will understand it. An educated person giving it [education] to an educated person they will understand it. Young Man, Focus Group Discussion, EHP

                      Discussion

                      In exploring options for the implementation of a MC program for HIV prevention in PNG this study has highlighted the conflicts between health system practicalities and realities, and community expectations of how such programs should be delivered. Further to this, implementation of a health program that has parallels with prevailing traditional and contemporary practices which are grounded in diverse socio-cultural contexts are likely to increase tensions if not addressed in an appropriate way. Suggested service delivery barriers and facilitators were also diverse and included issues of shame, appropriate location in which to conduct the procedure, who should be involved and how, and who the target population should be. Conversely, awareness, affordability and ease of access were consistently identified as important contributors to meeting community needs and if not addressed will likely increase risk of program failure. Attitudes and perceptions towards circumcision and how services should be delivered will influence uptake and community participation approaches provide an option for exploring these challenges.

                      Working against the grain

                      Health programs are underpinned by the interests and expectations of the health system that cannot be down played and this needs to be acknowledged when according true community participation [1, 39, 42]. Community perception of health service delivery often does not recognise the same boundaries of the health system, and tensions may exist with medico-legal requirements and bio-medical best practice. For example, potential for misperception has been highlighted in introducing MC for HIV prevention in some communities in South Africa due to conflicting messages of abstinence and sexual responsibility evident in the health program compared to the sexual privilege and masculine virility messages that accompany traditional circumcision and initiation ceremonies within the community [7577]. In our study, there was clear evidence that communities in PNG endorsed forms of penile cutting that have not been confirmed to provide protection against HIV acquisition. These findings reflect earlier research by our group which demonstrated that many men opt to perform penile cutting within the community without a medically trained practitioner [9, 17]. Concerns about access, cost and reluctance of men to access formal health services for MC also resulted in some mixed proposals for risk mitigation, with some strategies beyond the capacity or legal framework of the health system (such as providing equipment to perform cutting at home without attention to counselling on risk reduction and post-operative care). Complex interconnectedness between policies, health system capacity, legislation and system hierarchies form an invisible and subconscious web of forces with socially constructed scientific knowledge, established practices and diverse community voices. If not adequately addressed, the competing priorities and agendas of the key stakeholders pull program intentions in many directions `working against the grain` with varying results, as tears and strains in relationships are restored, loosened or pulled further apart. Identifying this conflict is one step, understanding how to involve communities in meaningful and sustainable ways to develop a culturally safe, assessable and affordable program is integral to success.

                      The role of participatory approaches

                      Community engagement and participation has played a critical role in successful communicable disease control and elimination campaigns in many countries [2, 57, 60]. In HIV prevention programs in particular, community participation has shown significant community-level change in safe sex and at-risk drug behaviours following health promotion programs that employed community coalitions [47, 78]. Community-centred approaches have also been identified as integral to working in resource-limited settings, where at-risk populations are often marginalised within the broader community and considered vulnerable both in terms of increased risk of HIV and sexually transmitted infections (STIs), and due to stigma, poverty, social exclusion and lack of access to education, healthcare and other essential services [57, 79, 80]. Collaboration with community members should aim to place the whole person, and not just the disease, at the centre of health interventions [1, 39]. This empowers people to assume responsibility for their own health, and facilitates effective partnerships to be built between the health program and the community [49, 81]. The design and success of community participation may however vary significantly due to geographic location, disease impact, socio-cultural environments, political context, economic conditions, resource availability and health policy [2].

                      Successful involvement of communities in meaningful and sustainable ways in health services requires a robust understanding of local approaches for community involvement in the face of political, social, economic, and epidemiological pressures [2, 36, 39, 42, 82]. This research shows that key to developing program models of service delivery was appreciation of the difference in expectations and traditions of different cultural groups in PNG. All respondents agreed that different areas would indeed respond better to tailored service delivery of MC programs designed specifically for their communities. Many studies have shown that even in areas where from an external point of view, modern and indigenous practices conflict, local people find ways of making their own cognitive adjustments and of integrating their need to resort to both traditional and modern options, with positive and negative results [39, 83, 84]. Engagement in community collaborations and community participation in the design and implementation of health programs allows for increased ownership as well as avenues to address emerging concerns or questions. Community participation should be an evolving process, whose tensions and contradictions are created and resolved through stages of demands and accommodations [41, 42, 85, 86].

                      To assist with building partnerships and trust in the implementation of any future MC program, community members and stakeholders specified that awareness and education be high on the program agenda particularly for women. This was also similar to some studies in Africa where education and awareness of female partners or mothers in the uptake of MC was considered important [16, 8789]. Awareness is knowledge empowerment that includes clear understanding of health service purpose as well as key aspects of program requirements. The existence of secular trends in the community driven by increased communication of MC trial results, the discussion about MC services and an increasing appreciation of the distinction between MC for health reasons and MC as a traditional rite has also been described as a potential issue in studies in Africa [9092]. There is therefore a responsibility of the health system to acknowledge internal and external influences on awareness and management of health programs, particularly if there is a potential for misperceptions to develop. Participatory approaches allow for collaboration with those affected by the issue being studied for the purposes of education and taking action or effecting social change [93].

                      Engaging traditionally circumcising communities

                      Most often, communities who engaged in traditional cutting in Africa were largely opposed to the medically performed procedure due to issues related to stigma, cost and cultural significance [5, 75, 94, 95]. Although maintaining cultural significance plays an important part in PNG, many respondents from traditionally circumcising communities were supportive of a HW completing the procedure as part of traditional ceremony in the village. In PNG, location and people involved seem to define meaning rather than the procedure for traditionally circumcising communities. The interest in allowing biomedical HIV prevention strategies to be integrated with traditional practices offers significant opportunity to mitigate potential complications resulting from procedures performed by non-health workers (a goal of the health system); and to involve and honour the symbolic roles of traditional leaders and circumcisers to provide traditional legitimacy (goal of the community) [5, 75, 94]. However, as has already been recognised in some African settings, MC performed in a clinically controlled setting, even if it is endorsed by traditional and contemporary communities, is likely to be hampered by health system capacity in resource-constrained settings such as PNG [96]. Setting realistic and achievable goals during initial collaborations are essential to avoid unrealistic expectations of the program, to increase trust and to prevent dissonance between policy makers, health workers and communities.

                      The use of a traditional cutter was also suggested and often preferred and may assist in alleviating human resources burden in the health sector of PNG. Lessons of integration of traditional cutters may be learnt from the use of traditional birth attendants (TBAs) in maternal health. TBAs share similar characteristics to traditional penile cutters in that they generally lack formal medical training, but have been playing their role in communities for generations [97]. Competence, confidence and connectedness to the health system are key factors identified in the understanding of TBA roles and their potential for success [97, 98]. Traditional cutters have advantages in that they live within the community, understand local culture and customs and are likely to be well respected by community-members thus increasing acceptability and uptake of interventions and galvanising behaviour change [99]. However, without the proper training and supervision, these providers may be firmly entrenched in traditional customs that may be either potentially harmful or delay the receipt of appropriate care [100, 101]. Expectation placed onTBAs also need to be realised such as the inability of TBAs to reduce maternal mortality [102]. Also, as has been learned from successful TBA training and support programs, partnerships between traditional cutters and the formal health system would need to be strong and would require frequent and quality interactions between supervising health worker and traditional cutter.

                      Recommendations and implications for program planning and implementation

                      The sheer socio-cultural and linguistic diversity of PNG demands that health services be astute to local needs. A complex intervention such as MC for HIV prevention that already holds diverse socio-cultural meanings in PNG also confirms that one size will not fit all and this is likely to be the case for other health interventions delivered in this context. Decentralised health services need to have the capacity and competency to contextualise the way any health program should be delivered locally in negotiation with the community as equal partners, whilst ensuring efficacy and quality. Expectations that health planners and donors may place on rate and size of scale up may be unrealistic if these key local considerations are not realised or incorporated into effective and robust community partnerships. Service provision plans must be highly flexible to respond to changes in the needs and expectations of communities. There is also need for health program planners to continually engage in self-reflection and dialogue to understand the partnerships developing between the community and the program. Program integration within the cultural fabric of communities will not only assist in strengthening the health system in general, but also community relations for future health programs, if done in a community-centred way.

                      Limitations of Study

                      As is the nature of qualitative research, our findings are limited in their ability to be generalized to the wider population. This research was however conducted in four distinct regions of PNG and provides insights into the complexities of future service delivery of MC for HIV prevention in PNG. Another potential limitation of the study is the possible loss of nuances that can occur through the direct translation from ‘tok pisin’ to English of the FGD and IDIs recordings by the local research officers. Care was made to ensure that meanings were reflected in the translations through re-checking and confirming of information with researchers, and review of field notes as necessary.

                      Conclusions

                      Tensions exist in the design and implementation of health programs however, identification of facilitators and barriers through meaningful collaborations with communities will assist in developing safe and culturally appropriate health programs. Building trustful partnerships with communities are critical and are the result not only of history, culture and tradition, but also the application of participatory community engagement in health programs. It is also important that women be included in awareness campaigns about MC with the aim to empower greater knowledge about sexual health in general. Addressing these issues are essential to develop programs that will accommodate the presence or absence of practices that form the socio-cultural fabric of communities.

                      Abbreviations

                      EHP: 

                      Eastern Highlands province

                      ESP: 

                      East Sepik Province

                      FGD: 

                      Focus group discussion

                      HW: 

                      Health worker

                      IDI: 

                      In-depth interview

                      MC: 

                      Male circumcision

                      NCD: 

                      National Capital District

                      PNG: 

                      Papua New Guinea

                      WNBP: 

                      West New Britain Province.

                      Declarations

                      Acknowledgements

                      We would like to thank all participants for taking the time to share their valuable insights and experiences. We would also like to acknowledge the contribution of Maxine Whitaker for providing helpful feedback on the manuscript. This study was supported by an Australian Agency for International Development (AusAID) Australian Development Research Award (ADRA) for the Male Circumcision Acceptability and Impact Study, PNG (MCAIS).

                      Authors’ Affiliations

                      (1)
                      Australian Centre for International & Tropical Health, School of Population Health, University of Queensland
                      (2)
                      Sexual & Reproductive Health Unit, Papua New Guinea Institute of Medical Research (PNG IMR)
                      (3)
                      International HIV Research Group, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of New South Wales
                      (4)
                      Public Health Interventions Research Group, The Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales

                      References

                      1. De Savigny D, Adam T: Systems Thinking for Health Systems Strengthening. Geneva: Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research, World Health Organization; 2009.
                      2. Atkinson JA, Vallely A, Fitzgerald L, Whittaker M, Tanner M: The architecture and effect of participation: a systematic review of community participation for communicable disease control and elimination: implications for malaria elimination. Malar J 2011,10(1):225.PubMedView Article
                      3. Aggleton P: Roundtable: “Just a snip”? a social history of male circumcision. Reprod Health Matters 2007,15(29):15–21.PubMedView Article
                      4. Dunsmuir WD, Gordon EM: The history of circumcision. BJU Int 1999,83(S1):1–12.PubMedView Article
                      5. Peltzer K, Kanta X: Medical circumcision and manhood initiation rituals in the Eastern Cape, South Africa: a post intervention evaluation. Culture, Health & Sexuality: An International Journal for Research, Intervention and Care 2009,11(1):83–97.View Article
                      6. Kharwal S, Bharat S: Male circumcision within the context of HIV prevention in India: a qualitative study conducted among young men in Chandigarh, India. IOSR Journal of Nursing and Health Science 2013,1(3):31–43.View Article
                      7. Khumalo-Sakutukwa G, Lane T, Van Rooyen H, Chingono A, Humphries H, Timbe A, Fritz K, Chirowodza A, Morin SF: Understanding and addressing socio-cultural barriers to medical male circumcision in traditionally non-circumcising rural communities in sub-Saharan Africa. Cult Health Sex 2013. Epub ahead of print
                      8. Brown JE, Micheni KD, Grant EMJ, Mwenda JM, Muthiri FM, Grant AR: Varieties of male circumcision: a study from Kenya. Sex Transm Dis 2001,28(10):608–612.PubMedView Article
                      9. Hill P, Tynan A, Law G, Millan J, Browne K, Sauk J, Kupul M, Kelly A, Siba P, Kaldor J: A typology of penile cutting in Papua New Guinea: results of a modified Delphi study among sexual health specialists. Aids Care 2012,24(1):77–86.PubMedView Article
                      10. Wamai R, Morris B, Bailis S, Sokal D, Klausner J, Appleton R, Sewankambo N, Cooper D, Bongaarts J, de Bruyn G, Wodak A, Banerjee J: Male circumcision for HIV prevention: current evidence and implementation in sub-Saharan Africa. J Int AIDS Soc 2011,14(1):49.PubMedView Article
                      11. WHO/UNAIDS: Progress in scale-up of male circumcision for HIV prevention in Eastern and Southern Africa: focus on service delivery - 2011. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2011.
                      12. Peltzer K, Niang CI, Muula AS, Bowa K, Okeke L, Boiro H, Chimbwete C: Editorial review: male circumcision, gender and HIV prevention in sub-Saharan Africa: a (social science) research agenda. Journal of Social Aspects of HIV/AIDS 2007,4(3):658–667.PubMedView Article
                      13. WHO/UNAIDS: WHO/UNAIDS technical consultation on male circumcision and HIV prevention: research implications for policy and programming: conclusions and recommendations. Montreux: World Health Organisation; 2007.
                      14. Lundsby K, Dræbel T, Wolf Meyrowitsch D: ‘It brought joy in my home as in the area of my wife: how recently circumcised adult men ascribe value to and make sense of male circumcision. Glob Public Health 2011,7(4):352–366.PubMedView Article
                      15. Gilliam FD, Brooks RA, Leibowitz AA, Klosinski LE, Sawires S, Szekeres G, Weston M, Coates TJ: Framing male circumcision to promote its adoption in different settings. AIDS Behav 2010,14(5):1207–1211.PubMedView Article
                      16. Plotkin M, Castor D, Mziray H, Kuver J, Mpuya E, Luvanda PJ, Hellar A, Curren K, Lukobo-Durell M, Ashengo TA, Mahler H: “Man, what took you so long?” Social and individual factors affecting adult attendance at voluntary medical male circumcision services in Tanzania. Global Health: Science and Practice 2013,1(1):108–116.View Article
                      17. Kelly A, Kupul M, Aeno H, Neo J, Naketrumb R, Fitzgerald L, Hill PS, Kaldor JM, Siba P, Vallely A: More than just a cut: a qualitative study of penile practices and their relationship to masculinity, sexuality and contagion and their implications for HIV prevention in Papua New Guinea. BMC International Health and Human Rights 2012,12(1):10.PubMedView Article
                      18. Kelly A, Kupul M, Fitzgerald L, Aeno H, Neo J, Naketrumb R, Siba P, Kaldor JM, Vallely A: "Now we are in a different time; various bad diseases have come." Understanding men's acceptability of male circumcision for HIV prevention in a moderate prevalence setting. BMC Publ Health 2012,12(67):1–13.
                      19. Maclaren D, Tombe R, Redman-Maclaren M, Browne K, Mafile`o T, Manineng C, McBride WJH: A research based classification of penile cutting in Papua New Guinea: A synthesis of research findings from the ADRA and NHMRC studies. In the Joint National Policy Forum on Male Circumcision for HIV prevention in Papua New Guinea. Port Morseby; 2011.
                      20. MacLaren D, Tombe R, Redman-MacLaren M, Browne K, Mafile'o T, Manineng C, McBride WJH: "Stronger or tougher:" reasons for penile cutting in Papua New Guinea. Canberra: Australasian HIV/AIDS Conference; 2011:75.
                      21. Dinnen S: "Restoring Justice and Law and Order in Papua New Guinea" paper delivered to Island State Security 2003. Honolulu: Oceania at the crossroads Conference; 2003.
                      22. Fitzpatrick J, Ako W: Project report: empowering the initiation of a prevention strategy to combat malaria in Papua New Guinea. Rural Remote Health 2007, 7:693–706.PubMed
                      23. Tivinarlik A, Wanat CL: Leadership styles of New Ireland high school administrators. Anthropology & Education Quarterly 2006,37(1):1–20.View Article
                      24. Simet J, Iamo W: Cultural diversity and the united Papua New Guinea. National Research Institute: NRI Discussion Paper No64: Port Morseby; 1992.
                      25. Wendt N: Article for human rights feature: development in Papua New Guinea. Canberra: Australian Council for International Development; 2005.
                      26. Vallely A, Page A, Dias S, Siba P, Lupiwa T, Law G, Millan J, Wilson DP, Murray JM, Toole M, Kaldor J: The prevalence of sexually transmitted infections in Papua New Guinea: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 2010,5(12):e15586.PubMedView Article
                      27. Gray RT, Murray JM, Vallely A, Lote N, Lupiwa T, Millan J, Daoni E, Kaldor J, Siba P, Wilson D: The PNG HIV Model: explaining the past, describing the present, and forecasting the future of the HIV epidmic in PNG. Canberra, Australia: 23rd Australasian HIV and AIDS Conference; 2011:74.
                      28. Barclay A: Problems measuring community health status at a local level: Papua New Guinea's health information system. Rural Remote Health 2010,10(4):1539.PubMed
                      29. WHO: Papua New Guinea: health situation. Western Pacific Region: World Health Organisation; 2006.
                      30. Tynan A, Vallely A, Kelly A, Law G, Millan J, Siba P, Kaldor J, Hill PS: Vasectomy as a proxy: extrapolating health system lessons to male circumcision as an HIV prevention strategy in Papua New Guinea. BMC Health Serv Res 2012,12(1):299.PubMedView Article
                      31. Tynan A, Vallely A, Kelly A, Kupul M, Law G, Milan J, Siba P, Kaldor J, Hill PS: Health workers, health facilities and penile cutting in Papua New Guinea: implications for male circumcision as an HIV prevention strategy. Papua New Guinea Medical Journal 2011,54(3–4):109–122.
                      32. Macfarlane J: Common themes in the literature on traditional medicine in Papua New Guinea. Papua New Guinea Medical Journal 2009,52(1):44–53.PubMed
                      33. MacLaren D, Tommbe R, Mafile’o T, Redman-MacLaren M, Manineng C, Browne K, McBride WJH: Acceptability of Male Circumcision for HIV Prevention at Four Sites in Papua New Guinea. Kimbe, West New Britain, Papua New Guinea: Papua New Guinea Medical Society; 2011. [47th Papua New Guinea Sexual Health Society Symposium]
                      34. Jenkins C: HIV/AIDS, Culture, and Sexuality in Papua New Guinea. In Cultures and Contexts Matter Understanding and Preventing HIV in the Pacific. Manila: Asia Development Bank; 2006:1–69.
                      35. NACS: National HIV and AIDS strategy 2011–2015: Papua New Guinea national AIDS council: Port Moresby. Port Morseby: National AIDS Council Secretariat, Government of Papua New Guinea; 2010.
                      36. Chimere-Dan GC: Public views on community involvement in local health services in South Africa. Public Health 1997,111(6):399–404.PubMed
                      37. WHO: People-centred health care: a policy framework. Manilla: World Health Organisation Regional Office for the Western Pacific; 2007.
                      38. Beard TC, Redmond S: Declaration of Alma-Ata. Lancet 1979,313(8109):217–218.View Article
                      39. Rifkin SB: Lessons from community participation in health programmes: a review of the post Alma-Ata experience. International Health 2009,1(1):31–36.View Article
                      40. WHO: Primary health care: now more than ever. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2008.
                      41. Filho RM, de Araújo JLC: Discussing community participation in health: an approach from the Brazilian experience. Revista Brasileira de Saúde Materno Infantil 2002, 2:91–103.View Article
                      42. MacQueen KMME, Metzger DS, Kegeles S, Strauss RP, Scotti R, Blanchard L, Trotter RT: What is community? an evidence-based definition for participatory public health. Am J Public Health 2001,91(12):1929–1938.PubMedView Article
                      43. Woelk GB: Cultural and structural influences in the creation of and participation in community health programmes. Soc Sci Med 1992,35(4):419–424.PubMedView Article
                      44. Tatar M: Community participation in health care: the Turkish case. Soc Sci Med 1996,42(11):1493–1500.PubMedView Article
                      45. Madan TN: Community involvement in health policy; socio-structural and dynamic aspects of health beliefs. Soc Sci Med 1987,25(6):615–620.PubMedView Article
                      46. Ugalde A: Ideological dimensions of community participation in Latin American health programs. Soc Sci Med 1985,21(1):41–53.PubMedView Article
                      47. Merzel C, D’Afflitti J: Reconsidering community-based health promotion: promise, performance, and potential. Am J Public Health 2003,93(4):557–574.PubMedView Article
                      48. Perez D, Lefevre P, Sanchez L, Sanchez L, Boelaert M, Kouri G, Van der Stuyft P: Community participation in Aedes aegypti control: a sociological perspective on five years of research in the health area ''26 de Julio'', Havana, Cuba. Trop Med Int Health 2007, 12:664–672.PubMedView Article
                      49. Stone L: Cultural influences in community participation in health. Soc Sci Med 1992,35(4):409–417.PubMedView Article
                      50. Khun S, Manderson L: Community participation and social engagement in the prevention and control of dengue fever in rural Cambodia. Dengue Bulletin 2008, 32:145–155.
                      51. Jacobs B, Price N: Community participation in externally funded health projects: lessons from Cambodia. Health Policy Plan 2003, 18:399–410.PubMedView Article
                      52. Morgan LM: Community participation in health: perpetual allure, persistent challenge. Health Policy Plan 2001,16(3):221–230.PubMedView Article
                      53. Tanner M, Vlassoff C: Treatment-seeking behaviour for malaria: a typology based on endemicity and gender. Soc Sci Med 1998, 46:523.PubMedView Article
                      54. Mchunu G: The levels of Community Involvement in Health (CIH): a case of rural and urban communities in KwaZulu-Natal. Curationis 2009,32(1):4–13.PubMedView Article
                      55. Molyneux S, Atela M, Angwenyi V, Goodman C: Community accountability at peripheral health facilities: a review of the empirical literature and development of a conceptual framework. Health Policy Plan 2012,27(7):541–554.PubMedView Article
                      56. Israel BA, Schulz AJ, Parker EA, Becker AB: Review of community based research: assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annual Reviews Public Health 1998, 19:172–202.
                      57. Shagi C, Vallely A, Kasindi S, Chiduo B, Desmond N, Soteli S, Kavit N, Vallely L, Lees S, Hayes R, Ross D: A model for community representation and participation in HIV prevention trials among women who engage in transactional sex in Africa. Aids Care 2008,20(9):1039–1049. on behalf of the Microbicides Development, ProgrammePubMedView Article
                      58. Connor D: A new ladder of citizen participation. Natl Civ Rev 2007, 77:249–257.View Article
                      59. Arnstein S: A ladder of citizen participation. J Am Inst Plann 1969, 35:216–224.View Article
                      60. Sleigh A, Xueming L, Jackson S, Huang K: Eradication of schistosomiasis in Guangxi, China. Part 1: Setting, strategies, operations, and outcomes, 1953–92. Bull World Health Organ 1998, 76:361–372.PubMed
                      61. Barber K: The Bugiau community at eight-mile: an urban settlement in Port Moresby, Papua New Guinea. Oceania 2003,73(4):287–297.
                      62. Chand S, Yala C: Making land work. In Informal land systems within urban settlements in Honiara and Port Moresby. 1st edition. Edited by: Steven W, Daniel F, Theo L, O'Connor P. Canberra: AusAID; 2008.
                      63. Gare J, Lupiwa T, Suarkia DL, Paniu MM, Wahasoka A, Nivia H, Kono J, Yeka W, Reeder JC, Mgone CS: High prevalence of sexually transmitted infections among female sex workers in the Eastern Highlands Province of Papua New Guinea: correlates and recommendations. Sex Transm Dis 2005,32(8):466–473.PubMedView Article
                      64. Foley WA: The Papuan languages of New Guinea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1986.
                      65. Tuzin DF: The Voice of the Tambaran: Truth and Illusion in Ilahita Arapesh Religion. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1980.
                      66. Williamson MH: Gender in the cosmos in Kwoma culture. Sepik Heritage: Tradition and Change in Papua New Guinea. Sydney: Crawford House Press; 1990.
                      67. Hogbin I: The island of menstruating men: religion in Wogeo. Chandler Pub. Co: New Guinea Prospect Heights; 1970.
                      68. Tuzin D: Rituals of Manhood: Male Initiation in Papua New Guinea. Edited by: Herdt GH. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Transaction Publishers; 1982:321–355.
                      69. Newman P, Boyd D: The Making of Men: Ritual and meaning in Awa male initiation. In Rituals of Manhood: Male Initiation in Papua New Guinea. Edited by: Herdt GH. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Transaction Publishers; 1982:239–285.
                      70. Kelly A, Kupul M, Aeno H, Neo J, Naketrumb R, Fitzgerald L, Hill PS, Kaldor JM, Siba P, Vallely A: If he cuts his skin he won't think of his wife: why women object to male circumcision to prevent HIV in a moderate-prevalence setting. Qualtitaive Health Research 2013,23(2):180–193.View Article
                      71. Vallely A, MacLaren D: Male circumcision for HIV prevention in Papua New Guinea: a summary of two research projects. A Briefing Document prepared by the investigator teams. Port Moresby, Papua New Guinea; 2011. [National Policy Forum on Male Circumcision for HIV Prevention]
                      72. Vallely A, MacLaren D, Kaleva W, Millan J, Tommbe R, Marape W, Buchanan H, Amos A, Kelly A, Kupul M, Aeno H, Trowalle E, John L, Redman-MacLaren M, Ryan C, Browne K, Tynan A, Hill PS, Gray R, Murray J, Wilson D, Siba P, McBride J, Farley T, Kaldor JM: Male circumcision for HIV prevention in PNG: a summary of research evidence and recommendations for public health following a national policy Forum. Papua New Guinea Medical Journal 2011,54(3–4):1.
                      73. Vallely A, Lees S, Shagi C, Kapiga S, McCormack S, Hayes R: Ethics, justice and community participation in the Microbicides Development Programme (MDP) Phase III Trial in Mwanza, Tanzania. Am J Bioeth 2012,12(11):46–48.PubMedView Article
                      74. Atkinson J, Fitzgerald L, Toaliu H, Taleo G, Tynan A, Whittaker M, Riley I, Vallely A: Community participation for malaria elimination in Tafea Province Vanuatu: Part I. Maintaining motivation for prevention practices in the context of disappearing disease. Malar J 2010, 9:93.PubMedView Article
                      75. Mshana G, Wambura M, Mwanga J, Mosha J, Mosha F, Changalucha J: Traditional male circumcision practices among the Kurya of North-eastern Tanzania and implications for national programmes. Aids Care 2011,23(9):1111–1116.PubMedView Article
                      76. Weiss H, Dickson K, Agot K, Hankins C: Male circumcision for HIV prevention: current research and programmatic issues. AIDS 2010,24(suppl 4):S61-S69.PubMedView Article
                      77. Vincent L: ‘Boys will be boys’: traditional Xhosa male circumcision, HIV and sexual socialisation in contemporary South Africa. Culture, Health & Sexuality: An International Journal for Research, Intervention and Care 2008,10(5):431–446.View Article
                      78. Tedrow VA, Zelaya CE, Kennedy CE, Morin SF, Khumalo-Sakutukwa G, Sweat MD, Celentano DD: No “Magic Bullet”: exploring community mobilization strategies used in a multi-site community based randomized controlled trial: project accept (HPTN 043). AIDS Behav 2012,16(5):1217–1226.PubMedView Article
                      79. Gysels M, Pool R, Nnalusiba B: Women who sell sex in a Ugandan trading town: life histories, survival strategies and risk. Social Science and Medicine 2002, 54:179–192.PubMedView Article
                      80. Mills E, Nixon S, Singh S, Dolma S, Nayyar A, Kapoor S: Enrolling women into HIV preventive vaccine trials: an ethical imperative but a logistical challenge. PLoS Med 2006,3(3):94.View Article
                      81. Gargioni G: Chapter 64 - role of communities in tuberculosis care and prevention. In Tuberculosis. Edited by: Schaaf H, Zumla A, Grange J, Raviglione M, Yew W, Starke J, Pai M, Donald P. Edinburgh: W.B. Saunders; 2009:660–667.View Article
                      82. Rocha EM: A Ladder of Empowerment. J Planning Educ Res 1997,17(1):31–44.View Article
                      83. Tynan A, Atkinson J, Toaliu H, Taleo G, Fitzgerald L, Whittaker M, Riley I, Schubert M, Vallely A: Community participation for malaria elimination in tafea province, vanuatu: part ii: social and cultural aspects of treatment-seeking behaviour. Malar J 2011,10(1):204.PubMedView Article
                      84. Ramdas S: Cruel disease, cruel medicine: self-treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis with harmful chemical substances in Suriname. Soc Sci Med 2012,75(6):1097–1105.PubMedView Article
                      85. Vallely A, Lees S, Shagi C, Kasindi S, Soteli S, Kavit N, Vallely L, McCormack S, Pool R, Hayes R, et al.: How informed is consent in vulnerable populations? Experience using a continuous consent process during the MDP301 vaginal microbicide trial in Mwanza, Tanzania. BMC Med Ethics 2010,11(1):10.PubMedView Article
                      86. Vallely A, Shagi C, Kasindi S, Desmond N, Lees S, Chiduo B, Hayes R, Allen C, Ross D: The benefits of participatory methodologies to develop effective community dialogue in the context of a microbicide trial feasibility study in Mwanza, Tanzania. BMC Publ Health 2007,7(1):133. The Microbicides Development ProgrammeView Article
                      87. Bridges JP, Searle S, Selck F, Martinson N: Designing family-centered male circumcision services. Patient 2012,5(2):101–111.PubMedView Article
                      88. Jones D, Cook R, Arheart K, Redding C, Zulu R, Castro J, Weiss S: Acceptability, knowledge, beliefs, and partners as determinants of Zambian men’s readiness to undergo medical male circumcision. AIDS Behav 2013. Epub ahead of print
                      89. Wilcken A, Miiro-Nakayima F, Hizaamu NB, Keil T, Balaba-Byamsi D: Male circumcision for HIV prevention – a crosssectional study on awareness among young people and adults in rural Uganda. BMC Publ Health 2010,10(209):1–11.
                      90. Westercamp M, Agot KE, Ndinya-Achola J, Bailey RC: Circumcision preference among women and uncircumcised men prior to scale-up of male circumcision for HIV prevention in Kisumu, Kenya. Aids Care 2011,24(2):157–166.PubMed
                      91. Tarimo E, Francis J, Kakoko D, Munseri P, Bakari M, Sandstrom E: The perceptions on male circumcision as a preventive measure against HIV infection and considerations in scaling up of the services: a qualitative study among police officers in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. BMC Publ Health 2012,12(1):529.View Article
                      92. Mattson CL, Bailey RC, Muga R, Poulussen R, Onyango T: Acceptability of male circumcision and predictors of circumcision preference among men and women in Nyanza Province, Kenya. Aids Care 2005,17(2):182–194.PubMedView Article
                      93. Green LW, Mercer SL: Can public health researchers and agencies reconcile the push from funding bodies and the pull from communities? Am J Public Health 2001,91(12):1926–1929.PubMedView Article
                      94. Niang CI, Boiro H: Roundtable: “You can also cut my finger!”: Social construction of male circumcision in West Africa, a case study of Senegal and Guinea-Bissau. Reprod Health Matters 2007,15(29):22–32.PubMedView Article
                      95. Mark D, Middelkoop K, Black S, Roux S, Fleurs L, Wood R, Bekker L: Low acceptability of medical male circumcision as an HIV/AIDS prevention intervention within a South African community that practises traditional circumcision. S Afr Med J 2012,102(6):571–572.PubMed
                      96. Wilcken A, Keil T, Dick B: Traditional male circumcision in eastern and southern Africa: a systematic review of prevalence and complications. Bull World Health Organ 2010,88(12):907–914.PubMedView Article
                      97. Darmstadt GL, Lee ACC, Cousens S, Sibley L, Bhutta ZA, Donnay F, Osrin D, Bang A, Kumar V, Wall SN, et al.: 60 million non-facility births: who can deliver in community settings to reduce intrapartum-related deaths? Int J Gynecol Obstet 2009,107(0):S89-S112.View Article
                      98. Byrne A, Morgan A: How the integration of traditional birth attendants with formal health systems can increase skilled birth attendance. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2011,115(2):127–134.PubMedView Article
                      99. Nyanzi S, Manneh H, Walraven G: Traditional birth attendants in rural Gambia: beyond health to social cohesion. Afr J Reprod Health 2007, 11:43–56.PubMedView Article
                      100. Kaingu C, Oduma J, Kanui T: Practices of traditional birth attendants in Machakos District, Kenya. J Ethnopharmacol 2011, 137:495–502.PubMedView Article
                      101. Mbaruku G, Msambichaka B, Galea S, Rockers P, Kruk M: Dissatisfaction with traditional birth attendants in rural Tanzania. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2009, 107:8–11.PubMedView Article
                      102. Sacks E, Bailey JM, Robles C, Low LK: Neonatal care in the home in Northern rural Honduras: a qualitative study of the role of traditional birth attendants. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs 2013,27(1):62–71.PubMedView Article
                      103. Pre-publication history

                        1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here: http://​www.​biomedcentral.​com/​1471-2458/​13/​749/​prepub

                      Copyright

                      © Tynan et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

                      This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​2.​0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.