Acceptability of HIV self-testing: a systematic literature review
© Krause et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 6 April 2013
Accepted: 2 August 2013
Published: 8 August 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|6 Apr 2013||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|9 Apr 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Janne Krause|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|9 Apr 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|20 May 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Alex Carballo-Dieguez|
|29 May 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Marlise Richter|
|7 Jun 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jessika Deblonde|
|12 Jun 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Juan Hoyos|
|24 Jul 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Janne Krause|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|24 Jul 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|2 Aug 2013||Editorially accepted|
|8 Aug 2013||Article published||10.1186/1471-2458-13-735|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.