Effect of changes in a food frequency questionnaire: comparing data from two national dietary survey instruments among 12-month-old infants
© Kristiansen et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 12 March 2013
Accepted: 19 July 2013
Published: 24 July 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|12 Mar 2013||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|17 May 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - fahimeh haghighatdoost|
|27 May 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Mohammad Rouhani|
|2 Jul 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Anne Lene Kristiansen|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|2 Jul 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|9 Jul 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - fahimeh haghighatdoost|
|17 Jul 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Mohammad Rouhani|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|19 Jul 2013||Editorially accepted|
|24 Jul 2013||Article published||10.1186/1471-2458-13-680|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.