Trends in sugar supply and consumption in Australia: is there an Australian Paradox?
© Rikkers et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 10 September 2012
Accepted: 13 June 2013
Published: 18 July 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|10 Sep 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|2 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sara Bleich|
|11 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Rosemary Stanton|
|18 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Boyd Swinburn|
|18 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Alan Barclay|
|30 Nov 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Katherine Hafekost|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|30 Nov 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|10 Dec 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sara Bleich|
|16 Dec 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Alan Barclay|
|11 Feb 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Katherine Hafekost|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|11 Feb 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|13 Jun 2013||Editorially accepted|
|18 Jul 2013||Article published||10.1186/1471-2458-13-668|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.