Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Sickness absence due to otoaudiological diagnoses; a descriptive nationwide study

BMC Public Health201313:635

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-635

Received: 23 January 2013

Accepted: 28 June 2013

Published: 8 July 2013

Abstract

Background

Hearing difficulties constitute a large public health problem. Knowledge about their consequences in terms of sickness absence due to otoaudiological diagnoses is very scarce. The aim of this study was to gain such knowledge. Both individuals with sick leave due to otoaudiological diagnoses and sick-leave spells due to these diagnoses were examined, in a nationwide setting.

Methods

Through Swedish nationwide registers we identified all 4768 individuals, aged 16–64 years and living in Sweden who were sickness absent due to otoaudiological diagnoses (ICD10; H60-H95) in 2005. We described the demographic characteristics of these individuals, as well as aspects regarding prevalence and duration of such sick-leave spells, in general and in four specific diagnosis groups; otological, hearing, vertigo, and tinnitus.

Results

Sick leave due to otoaudiological diagnoses was more common among women in all diagnosis groups except with tinnitus. Individuals with a hearing or tinnitus sick-leave diagnosis had a higher educational level and were hospitalized fewer days compared to those sickness absent due to vertigo or otological diagnoses. Particularly, sick-leave spells due to hearing or tinnitus diagnoses tended to be long, in many cases lasting the entire year. The majority of the individuals only had one sick-leave spell in 2005.

Conclusions

Although the actual number of individuals with a sick-leave spell due to specific otoaudiological diagnosis might not be considered high, the high prevalence of long sick-leave spells due to particularly hearing and tinnitus diagnoses indicates the importance of preventive and rehabilitative actions.

Keywords

Otoaudiological diagnoses Hearing difficulties Sick leave

Background

Hearing difficulties constitute a public health problem [1] that is increasing and even estimated to, in 2030, be the ninth leading burden of disease worldwide [2]. Hearing difficulties are associated with communication obstacles and may impact on health related quality of life, and cognitive and emotional status [36]. Other ear-related diagnoses emanating from the vestibular part of the inner ear and its central connections are; vertigo, dizziness, and balance disorders. Diseases affecting these systems also cause significant health problems that might lead to sick leave and exclusion from the labor market. Moreover, difficulties to hear is not only a major problem among the elderly - it is also a frequent problem in the working age population, thus potentially having an impact on sick leave [79]. Also, it has been suggested that people with hearing difficulties are overrepresented among those on long-term sick leave [10]. Hence, apart from the human suffering, the economic toll might be very high, for individuals, employers, as well as society [3].

In general, the majority of individuals with a disease or impairment, including hearing difficulties, are not sickness absent [1113], but have hearing aids, other aiding devices, and possibly an adapted work situation. Data on sickness absence is thus seldom a good measure of the occurrence of a disease; however, it is a very good measure of consequences of a disease or impairment, in terms of reduced work capacity [14].

Hearing difficulties may lead to sick leave by way of increased levels of stress. Even a minor hearing difficulty might decrease an individual’s possibilities to be involved in ordinary conversation, especially if several persons are talking at the same time or if there is a lot of background noise, the need to strain to hear might be stressful [7]. Some individuals may even feel stigmatized, and try to hide their difficulty, further increasing the risk of stress and in prolongation potentially also the risk of sick leave. In line with this, a recent study observed that the degree of low-frequency hearing loss was associated with early retirement [15]. Earlier studies have reported that hearing difficulties are more common among men [7, 16, 17], and also correlated with increased age. Thus analyses of sick leave, stratified by sex and age are warranted.

In spite of the magnitude of the problem, so far only three studies have presented any data describing aspects of individuals on sick leave due to hearing diagnoses [1820] (one based on the same material as presented here). However, these three studies did not include information regarding the characteristics of the sick-leave spells.

Thus, the objective of this study was to increase the knowledge regarding sick leave due to otoaudiological diagnoses, using different sick-leave measures to give a broad description of both the individuals on sick leave due to these diagnoses and of the characteristics of the sick-leave spells, as well as examine possible differences in this regarding sex and age distributions. This knowledge can be used as a base for initiatives aimed to limit the need for long term sick leave among individuals with otoaudiological problems.

Methods

Included were all 4768 individuals who lived in Sweden during 2005, who at the start of the year were; aged 16–64, not on disability or early old-age pension, and who in 2005 had had sickness benefits from the Swedish Social Insurance Agency for at least one sick-leave day due to otoaudiological diagnoses (source population 5 102 641 individuals).

For each individual we obtained the following register data:

From Statistics Sweden: information on sex, age, educational level, family situation/constellation, type of living area, country of birth, and old-age pension.

From the Board of Health and Welfare: number of days hospitalized during 2000–2005 (as a measure of prior morbidity).

From the Swedish Social Insurance Agency: data on all benefits for sickness absence (start and end date, diagnoses), disability pensions granted in 2005, and old-age pension.

The unique Personal Identity Number, assigned to all residents in Sweden, was used to link data from the different registers. All individuals in Sweden with income from work or unemployment benefits are covered by the same public sickness insurance, providing sick-leave benefits to people who due to disease or injury cannot work. A sickness certificate issued by a physician is required from the 8th day of a sick-leave spell, the first day is a qualifying day without benefits. Sickness benefits are paid by the Social Insurance Agency, however, the first 14 days of a sick-leave spell is usually paid by the employer. If the work incapacity is prognosticated to be permanent a disability pension can be granted.

Sick-leave spells with ≤6 days in between have been merged as they do not lead to a new qualifying day. Only days with benefits were included in this study. The sick-leave diagnoses were classified according to the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, version 10 (ICD-10) [21]. All individuals who had at least one sick-leave spell with an otoaudiological diagnosis as the main diagnose (ICD-10, chapter VIII, H60-H95) in 2005 were included. The otoaudiological diagnoses were categorized as: mainly “otological” (H60-H75, H80, H92, H94, H95), “hearing” (H83, H90, H91), “vertigo” (H81, H82), or “tinnitus” (H93). Individuals with more than one sick-leave spell could be categorized as having sick-leave spells due to several diagnoses.

Statistical analysis

The following measures of sickness absence were calculated: Frequencies and percentages of: people sickness absent, prevalent and incident sick-leave spells, sick-leave spells/individual, sick-leave spells/duration of sick-leave spells, sick-leave days/individual, sick-leave days/sick-leave spell, and granted disability pension in 2005.

Mean and median values for frequencies were calculated, regarding demographic variables and other characteristics in the different diagnosis groups. Only the sick-leave days compensated in 2005 were included, even if the sick-leave spells had begun before 1 January 2005 or continued after 31 December 2005. The maximum duration of a sick-leave spell was thus 365 days. Sick-leave spells were considered prevalent if the sick leave had begun before 1 January 2005, and otherwise considered incident/new. To examine age and sex differences, the material was stratified by these variables. Statistically significant deviance from equal distribution was assessed with an exact binomial test. Individuals with missing information on any of the variables examined were excluded from that analysis. All statistical tests were two sided, and P-values that were less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed using SAS software (version 9.2; SAS Institute, Cary, NC).

Ethical statement

This project has been evaluated and approved by the Regional Ethical Review Board of Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. The study was based on linkage of several public national registers. Ethical vetting is required when using register data in Sweden. The ethical vetting is performed by regional ethical review boards and the risk appraisal associated with the Law on Public Disclosure and Secrecy is done by data owners. The ethical review boards can, and in relation to this project did, waive the requirement to consult the data subjects directly to obtain their informed consent, this is most often the standard if the research is supported by the ethical review board and the data has already been collected in some other context.

Results

Demographic characteristics of the 4768 individuals (prevalence 93 per 100 000 individuals in the working population) with sick leave due to otoaudiological diagnoses during 2005, divided by different categories of otoaudiological diagnoses, are presented in Table 1. Sick leave due to all otoaudiological diagnoses was more common among older and female individuals. Sick leave due to vertigo was most common among women (p < 0.001) and sick leave due to tinnitus was slightly more common among men (p < 0.01). Individuals with a hearing or tinnitus sick-leave diagnosis had on average a higher educational level and fewer days hospitalized during 2000–2005 compared to those who had been sickness absent due to vertigo or otological diagnoses. Individuals with sick leave due to otological diagnoses were more often born outside of the European Union.
Table 1

Characteristics (frequency and %) for all individuals in Sweden with at least one sick-leave spell due to otoaudiological diagnoses in 2005

Characteristic

 

Sick-leave due to otoaudiological diagnosesa

  

All

Otologicalb

Hearingc

Vertigod

Tinnituse

Total No.

 

4768

1326

1012

1476

983

Age groups (years)

16-25

159 (3.33)

85 (6.41)

17 (1.67)

38 (2.57)

20 (2.03)

26-35

512 (10.74)

245 (18.48)

52 (5.14)

158 (10.70)

59 (6.00)

36-45

991 (20.78)

328 (24.74)

151 (14.92)

333 (22.56)

183 (18.62)

46-55

1369 (28.71)

348 (26.24)

295 (29.15)

468 (31.71)

266 (27.06)

 

56-65

1737 (36.43)

320 (24.13)

497 (49.11)

479 (32.45)

455 (46.29)

Sex

Women

2781 (58.33)

792 (59.73)

654 (64.62)

909 (61.59)

447 (45.47)

 

Men

1987 (41.67)

534 (40.27)

358 (35.38)

567 (38.41)

536 (54.53)

Education (years)

≥12

1738 (35.45)

359 (27.07)

494 (48.81)

456 (30.89)

441 (44.86)

10-12

2278 (47.78)

744 (56.11)

414 (40.91)

736 (49.86)

396 (40.28)

0-9

744 (15.60)

220 (16.59)

104 (10.28)

280 (18.97)

145 (14.75)

 

Missing

8 (0.17)

-

-

-

-

Family situation

Living with partner without children living at home

1296 (27.18)

248 (18.70)

351 (34.68)

382 (25.88)

321 (32.66)

Living with partner with children living at home

1757 (36.85)

542 (40.87)

304 (30.04)

604 (40.92)

316 (32.15)

Living without a partner without children living at home

1340 (28.11)

422 (31.83)

280 (27.67)

359 (24.32)

291 (29.69)

 

Living without a partner with children living at home

375 (7.86)

114 (8.60)

77 (7.61)

131 (8.88)

55 (5.60)

Type of living area

Larger cities

1568 (32.89)

498 (37.56)

303 (29.94)

497 (33.67)

283 (28.79)

Medium sized cities

1829 (38.36)

482 (36.35)

411 (40.61)

562 (38.08)

383 (38.96)

 

Smaller places

1371 (28.75)

346 (26.09)

298 (29.45)

417 (28.25)

317 (32.25)

Country of birth

Sweden

4142 (86.87)

1095 (82.58)

907 (89.62)

1278 (86.59)

888 (90.34)

Other Nordic countries

165 (3.46)

53 (4.00)

37 (3.66)

60 (4.07)

17 (1.73)

Other European Union countries

102 (2.14)

26 (1.96)

18 (1.78)

32 (2.17)

26 (2.64)

 

Rest of the world

359 (7.53)

152 (11.46)

50 (4.94)

106 (7.18)

52 (5.29)

Days hospitalized in 2000-2005

None

2506 (52.56)

493 (37.18)

643 (63.54)

708 (47.97)

676 (68.77)

<5

1244 (26.09)

495 (37.33)

200 (19.76)

382 (25.88)

175 (17.80)

 

≥5

1018 (21.35)

338 (25.49)

169 (16.70)

386 (26.15)

132 (13.43)

a Twenty-nine individuals had more than one sick-leave spell in two different otoaudiological diagnoses groups and thus are included in two categories.

b ICD10: H60-H75, H80, H92, H94, H95.

c ICD10: H83, H90, H91.

d ICD10: H81, H82.

e ICD10: H93.

In the category of otological diagnoses, the most common diagnosis were “suppurative and unspecified otitis media” (ICD-10: H66) responsible for more than a third of the sick-leave spells (Table 2). In the hearing category, the most common diagnosis was “conductive and sensorineural hearing loss” (ICD-10: H90), and “disorders of vestibular function” (ICD-10: H81) was without comparison the most common vertigo diagnosis.
Table 2

Number of sick-leave spells due to specific diagnoses within each of the four diagnostic categories used in the analyses

Categories

Sick-leave diagnoses (ICD-10)

Number of sick-leave spellsa(%)

Otological

 

1358 (100)

 

H60 Otitis externa

128 (9.43)

 

H61 Other disorders of external ear

29 (2.14)

 

H65 Nonsuppurative otitis media

101 (7.44)

 

H66 Suppurative and unspecified otitis media

493 (36.30)

 

H70 Mastoiditis and related conditions

10 (0.74)

 

H71 Cholesteatoma of middle ear

137 (10.09)

 

H72 Perforation of tympanic membrane

109 (8.03)

 

H74 Other disorders of middle ear and mastoid

43 (3.17)

 

H80 Otosclerosis

252 (18.56)

 

H92 Otalgia and effusion of ear classified elsewhere

16 (1.18)

 

H95 Postprocedural disorders of ear and mastoid process, not elsewhere classified

16 (1.18)

Less than 10 sick-leave spells in 2005, summed

H62 Disorders of external ear in diseases classified elsewhere; H67 Otitis media in diseases classified elsewhere; H68 Eustachian salpingitis and obstruction; H69 Other disorders of eustachian tube; H73 Other disorders of tympanic membrane; H75 Other disorders of middle ear and mastoid in diseases classified elsewhere; H94 Other disorders of ear in diseases

24 (17.67)

Hearing:

 

1078 (100)

 

H83 Other diseases of inner ear

37 (3.43)

 

H90 Conductive and sensorineural hearing loss

609 (56.49)

 

H91 Other hearing loss

432 (40.07)

Vertigo

 

1532 (100)

 

H81 Disorders of vestibular function

1516 (98.96)

 

H82 Vertiginous syndromes in diseases classified elsewhere

16 (1.04)

Tinnitus

H93 Other disorders of ear, not elsewhere classified (including tinnitus and other abnormal auditory perceptions)

1031 (100)

a Total number of spells due to otoaudiological diagnoses: 4999.

Individuals with otological diagnoses had on average fewer sick-leave days compared to individuals with hearing or tinnitus diagnoses. Hearing and tinnitus diagnoses also had a higher proportion of disability pensions granted during the year (Table 3).
Table 3

Different sick-leave measures among the individuals with at least one sick-leave spell due to otoaudiological diagnoses during 2005

 

Sick-leave diagnoses

 

All

Otological

Hearing

Vertigo

Tinnitus

No. of individuals

4768

1326

1012

1476

983

Prevalent sick-leave spells all diagnoses/individual

     

  Mean/median

1.2/1.0

1.3/1.0

1.2/1.0

1.3/1.0

1.2/1.0

  Range

1-11

1-7

1-6

1-11

1-5

Incident sick-leave spells all diagnoses/individual

     

  Mean/median

0.8/1.0

1.1/1.0

0.6/1.0

0.9/1.0

0.6/0.0

  Range

0-10

0-6

0-6

0-10

0-5

No. of sick-leave spells all diagnoses/individual

     

  1

3912

1046

859

1181

826

  2

709

227

135

240

130

  >2

147

53

18

55

27

No. of sick-leave days all diagnoses/individual

122.6/59.0

45.0/14.0

178.4/151.0

107.6/45.0

193.8/181.0

Mean/median

No. of sick-leave days due to otoaudiological diagnoses/individual

    

  1-27

1866

973

160

620

124

  28-180

1386

180

388

467

368

  181-364

728

46

258

167

253

  365

610

42

185

161

222

No. of DP 2005

546

25

221

95

207

DP, Disability pension.

Together, the 4768 individuals had 4999 prevalent sick-leave spells due to otoaudiological diagnoses during the year 2005 (Table 4). The median length of a sick-leave spell due to otological diagnoses was 11 days, in contrast to sick-leave spells due to tinnitus (150 days) and hearing diagnoses (124 days) where the median length of the sick-leave spells was considerably longer (Table 4).
Table 4

Distribution and characteristics of sick-leave spells due to otoaudiological diagnoses in 2005

 

At least one sick-leave day due to otoaudiological diagnoses

 

All

Otological

Hearing

Vertigo

Tinnitus

No. of prevalent sick-leave spells

4999

1358

1078

1532

1031

No. of incident sick-leave spells

3313

1205

544

1089

475

No. of sick-leave days/spell

112.0/41.0

35.9/11.0

162.8/124.0

97.3/33.0

178.7/150.0

Mean/median

No. of sick-leave spells with different durations

     

  1-27

2018

1016

198

653

151

  28-180

1492

175

423

498

398

  181-364

698

46

248

160

244

  365

610

42

185

161

222

Note: sick-leave spells with ≤6 days in between have been merged.

The analyses stratified by sex revealed only minor differences between women and men (Table 5). In the analyses stratified by age we observed that individuals 50 years old or older had more sick-leave days during the year and were more often granted a disability pension than individuals younger than 50 (Table 5).
Table 5

Description of sick leave among individuals with at least one sick-leave day due to otoaudiological diagnoses in 2005, stratified by sex and age

 

Otoaudiological diagnoses

 

All

Otological

Hearing

Vertigo

Tinnitus

Women

     

No. of individuals

2781

792

654

909

447

Prevalent sick-leave spells all diagnoses/individual

     

  Mean/median

1.2/1.0

1.3/1.0

1.2/1.0

1.3/1.0

1.2/1.0

  Range

1-7

1-7

1-6

1-5

1-5

No. of sick-leave days all diagnoses/individual

122.5/59.0

49.5/14.0

182.3/151.0

109.8/47.0

192.0/163.0

Mean/median

No. of individuals with sick-leave spells of different durations

    

  1-27

1090

563

95

377

56

  28-180

816

105

265

284

175

  181-364

394

32

158

108

103

  365

366

33

128

98

107

No. of DP 2005

307

17

149

62

81

Men

     

No. of individuals

1987

534

358

567

536

Prevalent sick-leave spells all diagnoses/individual

     

  Mean/median

1.2/1.0

1.2/1.0

1.3/1.0

1.2/1.0

1.2/1.0

  Range

1-11

1-5

1-4

1-11

1-5

No. of sick-leave days all diagnoses/individual

     

Mean/median

122.7/59.0

38.4/14.0

171.4/151.0

104.0/42.0

195.3/181.0

No. of individuals with sick-leave spells of different durations

    

  1-27

776

405

63

241

68

  28-180

570

77

124

182

190

  181-364

334

17

104

62

155

  365

244

9

57

63

115

No. of DP 2005

239

8

72

33

126

Age <50 yearsa

     

No. of individuals

2125

783

306

705

340

Prevalent sick-leave spells all diagnoses/individual

     

  Mean/median

1.2/1.0

1.3/1.0

1.2/1.0

1.3/1.0

1.2/1.0

  Range

1-5

1-5

1-4

1-5

1-5

No. of sick-leave days all diagnoses/individual

     

Mean/median

96.7/31.0

40.2/13.0

154.6/120.0

96.3/35.0

177.5/150.0

No. of individuals with sick-leave spells of different durations

    

  1-27

1048

593

78

326

52

  28-180

530

94

107

207

126

  181-364

236

25

68

67

80

  365

208

19

47

69

73

No. of DP 2005

125

9

47

29

40

Age ≥50 yearsa

     

No. of individuals

2643

543

706

771

643

Prevalent sick-leave spells all diagnoses/individual

     

  Mean/median

1.2/1.0

1.3/1.0

1.2/1.0

1.2/1.0

1.2/1.0

  Range

1-11

1-7

1-6

1-11

1-5

No. of sick-leave days all diagnoses/individual

     

Mean/median

143.3/90.0

52.0/15.0

188.8/167.0

117.8/57.0

202.4/194.0

No. of individuals with sick-leave spells of different durations

    

  1-27

818

375

80

292

72

  28-180

856

88

282

259

239

  181-364

492

24

194

103

178

  365

402

23

138

92

149

No. of DP 2005

421

16

174

66

167

Note: sick-leave spells with ≤6 days in between have been merged. DP, Disability pension.

a Mean age “all” 49.

The most common scenario (90%) following a sick-leave spell due to otoaudiological diagnoses was that there was no new sick-leave spell during the same year, this could be because the first sick-leave spell was still ongoing, because of the individual being granted disability pension, or because of return to work/unemployment (Figure 1). Six percent of the individuals had a new sick-leave spell due to a non-otoaudiological diagnosis and four percent had another sick-leave spell due to otoaudiological diagnoses, 83% due to the same diagnosis as the first one. Of the 4768 individuals with sick leave due to otoaudiological diagnoses in 2005, 12% were granted a disability pension during the same year (Figure 1).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2458-13-635/MediaObjects/12889_2013_Article_5616_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

Distributions (frequency and (percentage of total number of individuals)) of sickness absence or disability pension in 2005, among those having a sick-leave spell due to otoaudiological diagnosis in 2005.

Discussion

This population-based study describes all individuals aged 16–64 years who in 2005 lived in Sweden and were not on old-age or disability pension in the beginning of the year, and who had at least one sick-leave spell due to otoaudiological diagnoses in 2005. Sick-leave due to otoaudiological diagnoses was more common among women in all diagnosis groups, with the exception of tinnitus, where we observed a slight majority of men. The higher prevalence of sick leave related to hearing among women than men (65% compared to 35%) is an important finding. In epidemiological literature a well-known observation is that men have poorer hearing than women among adults [16, 17]. Also, men are more often exposed to occupational noise than women. Diagnoses related to vertigo are however generally observed to be more prevalent among women than men [22]. Our results indicate that the social consequences in terms of sickness absence seem to be higher for women. There are several possible explanations for this; women may for example depend on hearing in their work to a higher extent and thus be more vulnerable to a decrease in hearing capacity. Other types of studies are needed to investigate why sick leave due to hearing difficulties is more common among women.

The treatment of chronic middle ear diseases, like chronic otitis media, cholesteatoma, and otosclerosis, has improved dramatically due to the introduction of antibiotics and modern middle ear surgery, compared to the situation in the mid 20th century. However, chronic middle ear diseases still imply health problems that are clearly discernible in this study by the presence of patients, most often women and individuals born in a non European country, with sick-leave spells related to these diagnoses.

We found that particularly sick-leave spells due to hearing or tinnitus diagnoses tended to be long; in many cases they lasted the entire year. However, the vast majority of individuals only had one sick-leave spell during the year.

We have recently published a study of the risk of disability pension among these individuals with sick leave due to otoaudiological diagnoses, where we found a threefold risk of disability pension among those on sick leave due to audiological diagnoses (hearing and tinnitus) compared to those with sick leave due to non-otoaudiological diagnoses [20]. Only a few prior studies have presented characteristics of individuals on sick leave due to specific or any hearing diagnoses [1820] (one based on the same data material [20]), overall showing results in agreement with ours. To the best of our knowledge, this nationwide study describing sick leave due to otoaudiological diagnoses is the first to present information regarding the characteristics of such sick-leave spells.

Strengths and limitations

Major strengths of this study include its population-based nationwide design (not a sample), comprising all individuals in Sweden with a sick-leave spell due to otoaudiological diagnoses during one year. Other strengths are the high quality of the population-based registers and that the information was not self-reported [23, 24]. The wide range of demographic variables available is also an advantage as is the detailed information regarding sick-leave diagnoses. Such information is seldom available in large population-based studies, and made it possible to present several commonly used measures of sick leave, which facilitate comparison with future studies. The validity of sick-leave diagnoses is often discussed, however, seldom studied. We know of only one such study, which reported good validity of sick-leave diagnoses, when comparing them to the diagnoses stated in the medical records of the patients [25].

One limitation is that only information about the main diagnosis legitimizing the sickness absence was available. This means that for some sick-leave spells, hearing diagnoses might for example have been mentioned as a contributing diagnosis, thus leading to an underestimation of sickness absence related to hearing difficulties. Another limitation is that for employed individuals, information about most sick-leave spells shorter than 15 days were not included, thus the frequency of sick-leave spells observed in this study is an underestimation of the true number.

Conclusion

This nationwide population-based descriptive study presents new information of the characteristics of individuals with sick leave due to otoaudiological diagnoses as well as new information on their sick-leave spells. We observed a high prevalence of long and very long sick-leave spells due to these diagnoses which stress the great importance of preventive and work adaptive measures among individuals with hearing difficulties to minimize the need for long-term sick leave and permanent exclusion from the labor market.

Author’s contributions

Study concept and design: EF, KA. Acquisition of data: KA. Analysis and interpretation of data: EF, UR, KA. Drafting of the manuscript: EF. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: UR, KA. Administrative, technical or material support: KA. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Declarations

Acknowledgment

This work was financed by the Swedish Council for Working Life and Social Research (2007–1762, and 2006–1526).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Division of Insurance Medicine, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet
(2)
Center for Hearing and Communication Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet
(3)
Department of Audiology and Neurotology, Karolinska University Hospital

References

  1. Mathers C, Smith A, Concha M, World Health Organization: Global burden of hearing loss in the year 2000. Global Burden of Disease. 2000, Geneva: World Health Organization, 2001-2030. 2000Google Scholar
  2. Mathers CD, Loncar D: Projections of global mortality and burden of disease from 2002 to 2030. PLoS Med. 2006, 3 (11): 2011-2030.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Henry JA, Dennis KC, Schechter MA: General review of tinnitus: prevalence, mechanisms, effects, and management. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2005, 48 (5): 1204-1235.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Dalton DS, Cruickshanks KJ, Klein BE, Klein R, Wiley TL, Nondahl DM: The impact of hearing loss on quality of life in older adults. Gerontologist. 2003, 43 (5): 661-668.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Uhlmann RF, Larson EB, Rees TS, Koepsell TD, Duckert LG: Relationship of hearing impairment to dementia and cognitive dysfunction in older adults. JAMA. 1989, 261 (13): 1916-1919.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Idrizbegovic E, Hederstierna C, Dahlquist M, Kampfe Nordstrom C, Jelic V, Rosenhall U: Central auditory function in early Alzheimer’s disease and in mild cognitive impairment. Age Ageing. 2011, 40 (2): 249-254.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Hörselskadades Riksförbund: Årsrapport. (The Swedish Association of Hard of Hearing People, yearly report). (In Swedish). 2008, Sweden: StockholmGoogle Scholar
  8. Hasson D, Theorell T, Westerlund H, Canlon B: Prevalence and characteristics of hearing problems in a working and non-working Swedish population. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2010, 64 (5): 453-460.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Agrawal Y, Platz EA, Niparko J: Prevalence of hearing loss and differences by demographic characteristics among US adults: data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999–2004. Arch Intern Med. 2008, 168 (14): 1522-1530.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Danermark B, et al: A review of the psychosocial effects of hearing impairment in the working-age population. The impact of genetic hearing impairment. 2005, London: Whurr, 106-136.Google Scholar
  11. Marmot M, Feeney A, Shipley M, North F, Syme SL: Sickness absence as a measure of health status and functioning: from the UK Whitehall II study. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1995, 49 (2): 124-130.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Alexanderson K: Women’s health at work. Measuring health, indicators for working women. Edited by: Kilbom A, Messing K, Thorbjörnsson B, Solna . 1998, Solna, Sweden: National Institute for Working Life, 121-161.Google Scholar
  13. Alexanderson K, Norlund A: Swedish council on technology assessment in health care (SBU). Chapter 1. Aim, background, key concepts, regulations, and current statistics. Scand J Public Health Suppl. 2004, 63: 12-30.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Alexanderson K, Norlund A: Sickness absence - causes, consequences, and physicians sickness cerification practice. A systematic literature review by the Swedish council on technology assessment in health care. Scand J Public Health. 2004, 32 (Suppl 63): 1-263.Google Scholar
  15. Helvik AS, Krokstad S, Tambs K: Hearing loss and risk of early retirement. The HUNT study. Eur J Public Health. 2012, Epub ahead of printGoogle Scholar
  16. Helfer KS: Age, and hearing. Semin Hear. 2001, 22 (3): 271-286.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Kim S, Lim EJ, Kim HS, Park JH, Jarng SS, Lee SH: Sex differences in a cross sectional study of age-related hearing loss in Korean. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2010, 3 (1): 27-31.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Skoien AK, Wilhemsen K, Gjesdal S: Occupational disability caused by dizziness and vertigo: a register-based prospective study. Br J Gen Pract. 2008, 58 (554): 619-623.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Gustafsson K, Backenroth-Ohsako G, Rosenhall U, Ternevall-Kjerulf E, Ulfendahl M, Alexanderson K: Future risk for disability pension among people with sickness absence due to otoaudiological diagnoses; a population-based cohort study with a 12-year follow-up. Scand J Public Health. 2011, 39 (5): 501-507.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Friberg E, Jansson C, Mittendorfer-Rutz E, Rosenhall U, Alexanderson K: Sickness absence due to otoaudiological diagnoses and risk of disability pension: a nationwide Swedish prospective cohort study. PLoS One. 2012, 7 (1): e29966-View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. World Health Organization (WHO): International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision (ICD-10). 1992Google Scholar
  22. Yin M, Ishikawa K, Wong WH, Shibata Y: A clinical epidemiological study in 2169 patients with vertigo. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2009, 36 (1): 30-35.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Hensing G: Swedish council on technology assessment in health care (SBU). Chapter 4. Methodological aspects in sickness-absence research. Scand J Public Health Suppl. 2004, 63: 44-48.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Svedberg P, Ropponen A, Lichtenstein P, Alexanderson K: Are self-report of disability pension and long-term sickness absence accurate?Comparisons of self-reported interview data with national register data in a Swedish twin cohort. BMC Publ Health. 2010, 10: 763-View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Ljungdahl LO, Bjurulf P: The accordance of diagnoses in a computerized sick-leave register with doctor’s certificates and medical records. Scand J Soc Med. 1991, 19 (3): 148-153.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/13/635/prepub

Copyright

© Friberg et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.