Social capital, health behaviours and health: a population-based associational study
© Nieminen et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 23 May 2012
Accepted: 29 May 2013
Published: 27 June 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|23 May 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|25 May 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Tarja Nieminen|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|25 May 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|17 Sep 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - John Snelgrove|
|19 Sep 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Henk Flap|
|27 Sep 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Helen Louise Berry|
|3 Feb 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Tarja Nieminen|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|3 Feb 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|21 Feb 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - John Snelgrove|
|28 Feb 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Henk Flap|
|10 Apr 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Tarja Nieminen|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|10 Apr 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|29 Apr 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - John Snelgrove|
|19 May 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Tarja Nieminen|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|19 May 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|29 May 2013||Editorially accepted|
|27 Jun 2013||Article published||10.1186/1471-2458-13-613|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.