Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

A qualitative exploration of young adult smokers’ responses to novel tobacco warnings

BMC Public Health201313:609

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-609

Received: 1 February 2013

Accepted: 18 June 2013

Published: 25 June 2013

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
1 Feb 2013 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
15 Apr 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ron Borland
21 Apr 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ahmed Fathelrahman
22 Apr 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Becky Freeman
23 Apr 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Rachel Grana
11 May 2013 Author responded Author comments - Janet Hoek
Resubmission - Version 3
11 May 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 3
15 May 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Becky Freeman
28 May 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ahmed Fathelrahman
31 May 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ron Borland
1 Jun 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Rachel Grana
10 Jun 2013 Author responded Author comments - Janet Hoek
Resubmission - Version 4
10 Jun 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
18 Jun 2013 Editorially accepted
25 Jun 2013 Article published 10.1186/1471-2458-13-609

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
University of Otago

Advertisement