A qualitative exploration of young adult smokers’ responses to novel tobacco warnings
© Hoek et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 1 February 2013
Accepted: 18 June 2013
Published: 25 June 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|1 Feb 2013||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|15 Apr 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ron Borland|
|21 Apr 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ahmed Fathelrahman|
|22 Apr 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Becky Freeman|
|23 Apr 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Rachel Grana|
|11 May 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Janet Hoek|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|11 May 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|15 May 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Becky Freeman|
|28 May 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ahmed Fathelrahman|
|31 May 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ron Borland|
|1 Jun 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Rachel Grana|
|10 Jun 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Janet Hoek|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|10 Jun 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|18 Jun 2013||Editorially accepted|
|25 Jun 2013||Article published||10.1186/1471-2458-13-609|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.