Could a brief assessment of negative emotions and self-esteem identify adolescents at current and future risk of self-harm in the community? A prospective cohort analysis
© Phillips et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 17 January 2013
Accepted: 18 June 2013
Published: 22 June 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|17 Jan 2013||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|21 Jan 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Rhiannon Phillips|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|21 Jan 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|11 Mar 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Paul L. Plener|
|12 Mar 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Katherine Bevans|
|15 May 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Rhiannon Phillips|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|15 May 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|6 Jun 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Paul L. Plener|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|18 Jun 2013||Editorially accepted|
|22 Jun 2013||Article published||10.1186/1471-2458-13-604|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.