Skip to main content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Local perceptions of cholera and anticipated vaccine acceptance in Katanga province, Democratic Republic of Congo

  • Sonja Merten1, 2Email author,
  • Christian Schaetti1, 2,
  • Cele Manianga3,
  • Bruno Lapika3,
  • Claire-Lise Chaignat4,
  • Raymond Hutubessy5 and
  • Mitchell G Weiss1, 2
BMC Public Health201313:60

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-60

Received: 1 October 2012

Accepted: 18 January 2013

Published: 22 January 2013

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting

Original Submission
1 Oct 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
22 Nov 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Anna Lena Lopez
10 Dec 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Suman Kanungo
9 Jan 2013 Author responded Author comments - Sonja Merten
Resubmission - Version 3
9 Jan 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 3
18 Jan 2013 Editorially accepted
22 Jan 2013 Article published 10.1186/1471-2458-13-60

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute
University of Basel
Faculté des Sciences Sociales, Administratives et Politiques, Département d’Anthropologie, Université de Kinshasa
Global Task Force on Cholera Control, World Health Organization
Initiative for Vaccine Research, World Health Organization