Improving immunisation timeliness in Aboriginal children through personalised calendars
© Abbott et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 10 October 2012
Accepted: 14 June 2013
Published: 20 June 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|10 Oct 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|26 Feb 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Lise Olsen|
|4 Mar 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Alison Macpherson|
|19 Apr 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Penelope Abbott|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|19 Apr 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|8 May 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Lise Olsen|
|18 May 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Penelope Abbott|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|18 May 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|14 Jun 2013||Editorially accepted|
|20 Jun 2013||Article published||10.1186/1471-2458-13-598|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.