Long-term follow-up of a high- and a low-intensity smoking cessation intervention in a dental setting– a randomized trial
© Nohlert et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 29 November 2012
Accepted: 11 June 2013
Published: 19 June 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|29 Nov 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|20 Mar 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Christopher Niemiec|
|28 Mar 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Christian Meyer|
|3 May 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Eva Nohlert|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|3 May 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|17 May 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Christian Meyer|
|7 Jun 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Eva Nohlert|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|7 Jun 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|11 Jun 2013||Editorially accepted|
|19 Jun 2013||Article published||10.1186/1471-2458-13-592|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.