Prevalence of health-risk behaviours among Canadian post-secondary students: descriptive results from the National College Health Assessment
© Kwan et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 26 September 2012
Accepted: 29 May 2013
Published: 6 June 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|26 Sep 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|14 Nov 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Katherine Lust|
|18 Dec 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Adamson Muula|
|24 Dec 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Erin Hobin|
|7 Jan 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Seter Siziya|
|19 Mar 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Matthew Kwan|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|19 Mar 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|1 Apr 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Katherine Lust|
|2 Apr 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Adamson Muula|
|9 Apr 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Seter Siziya|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|29 May 2013||Editorially accepted|
|6 Jun 2013||Article published||10.1186/1471-2458-13-548|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.