Internet safety education for youth: stakeholder perspectives
© Moreno et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 16 April 2012
Accepted: 17 May 2013
Published: 5 June 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|16 Apr 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|26 Jul 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Amos Olagunju|
|26 Nov 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Terry Kind|
|11 Jan 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Megan Moreno|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|11 Jan 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|26 Jan 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Terry Kind|
|2 Feb 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Amos Olagunju|
|21 Feb 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Megan Moreno|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|21 Feb 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|22 Mar 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Amos Olagunju|
|11 May 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Megan Moreno|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|11 May 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|17 May 2013||Editorially accepted|
|5 Jun 2013||Article published||10.1186/1471-2458-13-543|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.