Traffic medicine–related research: a scientometric analysis
- Beatrix Groneberg-Kloft1,
- Doris Klingelhoefer2Email author,
- Simona E Zitnik†2 and
- Cristian Scutaru†3
© Groneberg-Kloft et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 17 January 2012
Accepted: 12 December 2012
Published: 5 June 2013
Traffic crashes and related injuries are important causes of morbidity and mortality and impose insofar an important burden on public health. However, research in this area is often under-funded. The aim of this study was to analyse quantity, evolution and geographic distribution of traffic medicine-related research. This multi-sectorial field covers both transport and health care sectors.
A scientometric approach in combination with visualizing density equalizing mapping was used to analyse published data related to the field of traffic medicine between 1900 and 2008 within the “Web of Science” (WoS) database.
In total, 5,193 traffic medicine-associated items were produced between 1900 and 2008. The United States was found to have the highest research activity with a production of n = 2,330 published items, followed by Germany (n = 298) and Canada (n = 219). Cooperation analyses resulted in a peak of published multilateral cooperations in the year of 2003. The country with the highest multilateral activity was the USA. The average number of cited references per publication varied heavily over the last 20 years with a maximum of 27.67 in 1995 and a minimum of 15.08 in 1998. Also, a further in-depth analysis was performed with a focus solely on public health aspects which revealed similar trends.
Summarizing the present data it can be stated traffic medicine-related research productivity grows annually. Also, an active networking between countries is present. The data of the present study may be used by scientific organisations in order to gain detailed information about research activities in this field which is extremely important for public health.
Traffic crashes and related injuries belong to the most important anthropogenic causes of morbidity and mortality in all parts of the world [1–3]. They are therefore a major burden of disease that affects issues of public health. A greater proportion of the burden of injury and disability is found in developing countries, due to the improved safety in industrialized countries . In detail, road crashes, with 50 million people being injured, account for approximately 1.2 million deaths each year. Road traffic injuries have been reported to be the second leading cause of death among young people in developing countries aged 15 – 29 years and among children aged 5 – 14 years [5, 6]. It can therefore be assumed that all means to increase traffic safety may help to reduce the global burden of disease. Studies analysing the potential effect of an absence of concerted efforts at prevention have concluded that there might be a dramatic increase in mortality and morbidity. It was calculated that road traffic deaths would increase from the 10th position in the list of the top 24 causes of death in 2002 to position eight by 2030 if concerted efforts at the prevention of road crashes are not implemented .
The last 50 years can be characterized by an exponential increase in medical, social and technical research in general [8, 9]. To deal with the large amount of data, quantitative and qualitative assessment tools for scientific output have become increasingly important. They now play a key role in the allocation of funding and prioritisation of resources as being demonstrated by the Research Assessment Exercise in the UK .
Despite its afore mentioned disease burden caused by traffic crashes, relatively little effort has previously been made to understand the trends emanating from traffic medicine-associated literature on a bibliographical basis. One reason is probably the multi-sectorial nature of this area which covers both transport and health care sectors. While there has been some concentration on the bibliometrics of occupational medicine generally [11–16], only little is known about specific scientific output related to traffic. Thus, the project “New Quality and Quantity Indices in Science” (NewQIS) [17, 18] decided to perform a detailed analysis of research yield in traffic medicine from 1900 to 2008. We applied large-scale data analysis, bibliometric indicators of production and quality, and density-equalizing calculations. These calculations are based on a algorithm that was published by Gastner and Newman . The mappings are used to illustrate international correlations by resizing single countries in proportion to a defined variable such as article number or citation number.
The present study was integrated into the NewQIS project. In this project, bibliometric tools are combined to visualizing techniques [17, 18]. All analyzed data were retrieved from Thomson Scientifics online database “Web of Science” (WoS). The PubMed database lacks citation information of the publications. This is why the entire analysis was conducted by the means of the WoS database.
The time frame was limited to the period between 1900 and 2008. For this purpose, the “Change Limits and Settings” function was adjusted initially and the query was made under this presetting. The years 2009–2012 were excluded in order to focus the study exclusively on completed years.
Data categorization was performed as previously described . In brief, the WoS database provided several tools to analyze entries according to specified parameters. The data set was analyzed by means of publication country, publication year, publishing author, publishing journals and published document type. Multiple distributions led to higher publication numbers when adding up results after analysis; for example, when a super regional publication is distributed to several countries. A common data processing program was used to display the results in tables, charts and diagrams.
Two search strategies were employed: For the general query (termed “general search”), the terms "traffic* securit*", "car crash*", "car accident*", "transport* accident*", "transport* crash*", "traffic* safet*", "car safet*", "vehicle crash*", "vehicle safet*" were connected with the Boolean operator “OR” and entered in the search field “Topic”. The asterisk stands as a placeholder for different word variations. In a second query that specifically addressed the area of public health and traffic, the terms “public health” AND “transport” OR “public health” and “traffic” were used. This search is termed “public health search”. This search was performed until the year 2011.
For a first insight, the total number of published items was recorded together with the type of publication (original article, meeting abstract, review etc.), assigned subject areas, and publishing journals.
Citations per year
We assessed the total number of citations of all identified published items. Since they were all recorded until the date of analysis, an average citation per item was computed for those years with at least 30 published items.
Analysis of origin / language
The information about the address of the authors was analyzed in order to determine the country of origin of the articles. For countries such as the former USSR which split up, the current location of the city (country) was taken into account when determining the origin of the publication.
Citation characteristics - average citation rate (countries)
For all countries with at least 30 published items the average citation rate was calculated. For a better understanding of the country-specific citation characteristics, a modified H-Index for countries was used. In this respect, the theory of the H-Index (Hirsch-Index) was extrapolated on all articles originating from a given country. Hence, the definition of this country-specific H-Index is: A country has index “h” if “h” of its “Np” papers have at least “h” citations each, and the other (“Np - h”) papers have no more than “h” citations each.
All publications were analysed under following aspects:
Number of published items
Total number of citations
Average number of citations
Assuming that the page format (i.e. the number of characters per page) of the journals is rather identical, the length of the publications was computed giving the start and end page. This procedure was performed for years in which 30 published items with page information was present.
Identified publications were also analyzed by means of citation. Therefore, the feature “Citation Report” was used to calculate the citation rate of both authors and citations per year of citation. The complete “Citation Report” was downloaded and by special VBA Software further analyzed and than edited with “Microsoft Excel”. Afterwards, the 10 most productive authors were analysed for citations. The average citation rate was defined as the quotient of the total citation number divided by the publications listed for the author in question.
Density equalizing mapping
This study used density equalizing mapping in order to illustrate different parameters. The principles of the underlying calculations were reported by Gastner and Newman  and integrated into the NewQIS platform projects . Software using the method of density equalizing mapping was employed to determine international correlations. This method resized countries proportionally according to a predefined variable. The territory with the highest number of publications was depicted largest on the associated map.
Number of published items
Looking at the evolution of citations in the general search, we found a similar evolution, with a very strong increase after 1990, however after 2004 the number of total citations dropped dramatically. The reason for this is that the articles were “too new” and there was no time for citing them so far. Publications published 2004 reached the highest number of citations (3314), followed by 2000 (3241) and 1998 (2949) (Figure 1B). Analyzing the average citation per item for years in which at least 30 publications were issued, we found a descending trend starting with 1992 which holds the highest value of 17.19 citations per item (Figure 1C). In the public health search, citation peaks were found in 1997, 2000 and 2004 (Figure 1F).
Evolution of the average number of authors per published item
Evolution of the cited references
The average number of cited references per article varied in the general search over the last 20 years between a maximum of 27 in 1995 and a minimum of 15 in 1998 with a slight increasing tendency (Figure 2B). In the public health search, the average number varied between 31 and 52 (Figure 2D).
Language related analysis
In the general search 95.22% of all analyzed publications were written in English. The second language by number of publications was German with only 2.87% followed by French (0.83%), Spanish (0.80%) and other (0.67%). All other languages with less than 10 publications were Russian (7), Portuguese (6), Japanese and Norwegian (each 4), Turkish (3), Chinese (2), and Croatian, Czech, Dutch, Italian, Lithuanian, Polish, Romanian, Slovenian and Swedish each with 1 publication. Most of the analyzed publications in the general search were original articles (60.37%) followed by proceedings papers (27.40%), editorial material (2.95%), reviews (2.25%), letters (1.77%), book reviews (1.12%), notes (0.94%), news items (0.35%) and reprints (0.21%).
Total citation analysis
The analysis of the total number of citations per country revealed a slightly different line-up, with the USA still unreachable with a total of 26,426 citations, followed by Canada (2,841), UK (2,165), Australia (1,886) and Sweden (1,231) (Figure 3B). When comparing the corresponding density equalizing cartograms, differences in the proportions could be shown between the general search (Figure 3B) and the public health search (Figure 3D); i.e. Australia and European countries play a more prominent role.
Average citation per item
The analysis of the modified H-Index for the countries resulted in the general search with the USA being the leading country with a value of 62, followed by Canada (29) (Figure 4B). In the public health search, again, other countries including European countries and Australia bridged the gap which can be visualized by the density equalizing mapping (Figure 4D).
International cooperation between countries
In the general search, the highest number of cooperation articles was a result of a bilateral liaisons (261 out of the 309), followed by team works between 3 countries (32), cooperations between 5 countries (8), cooperative works between 4 countries (5), cooperations between 6 countries (2) and finally 1 published item was the result of a collaboration between 7 different countries (Figure 5B). In the public health search, also the highest number of cooperations was due to a bilateral collaboration (182), followed by trilateral works (35) (Figure 5D).
Institution analysis - cooperation between institutions
Author analysis - cooperation network
Similarly to the Institution analysis, the cooperation network for all authors with at least 10 published items was computed. In the general search, the highest level of cooperation was reached by Durbin, DR and Winston, FK from the USA with 23 published items, followed by Richter, M and Otte, D from Germany with 17 publications and McGwin, G and Owsley, C from USA with 15 published items (Figure 7B). In the public health search, the highest number of identified cooperations was present between Sallis, JF and Salens, BE (8), and Sallis, JF and Frank, LD (7) (Figure 7D). It was not possible for some authors to retrieve the country affiliation because this information was not available in the WoS database.
Subject area analysis - published items
In the public health search, the leading subject area was also “Public, Environmental & Occupational Health”, followed by “General & Internal Medicine” (Figure 8B). A combination of these subject areas was also the highest number of dual assignments in the public health search (Figure 9B).
Subject area analysis - research and country focus analysis
In the public health search, a different setting was present with a more general domination of “Public, Environmental & Occupational Health” (Figure 10C, D).
BMC Public Health has published a number of studies related to scientometric analyses ([16, 22, 23]). The present study assessed the field of research related to traffic medicine using a combination of bibliometric tools and novel visualizing techniques. In the general search we found 5193 published items related to traffic medicine and starting with 1990 a dramatic increase in the number of published items was present. This is partially caused by the fact that starting with 1990 the WoS records also contained the abstract of the articles which impacts on the search routine. Another explanation could be the rapid development of cheap and fast communication means (email, Internet).
Some methodological issues need to be discussed before interpreting the data: One major issue is represented by difficulties in the terminology: In this respect, it needs to be stated that traffic medicine and related road traffic research is by definition multi-sectorial which spans both transport and health care sectors.
Given that road traffic-related research is multi-sectorial, it seems justified that many of the search terms used to identify the relevant research output focused on areas other than public health (e.g. traffic security, transport accident, transport crash etc.). At the same time, there appears to be a lack of search terms that focus specifically on the public health aspect of road traffic. Therefore, a second analysis was aimed to specifically address these aspects. Of course, also this second analysis is not all-encompassing but narrowly focussed. For instance, special issues including pedestrians, bi- and tri-cyclists are not captured completely in this approach. One therefore needs to emphasize that the present study cannot claim to exclusively focus on traffic medicine alone or transport research alone, but represents to some extent a juxtaposition.
With regard to the total output of research it can be stated that the field of traffic medicine research continues to increase annually but is relatively low in comparison to other research areas. This conclusion might be drawn when focussing on a recent study that addressed the research fields of cardiology and respiratory medicine in Europe . Here, it was shown that the output levels are generally higher in these fields of medicine.
The present findings may provide useful information for those who are tasked with improving the research performance in this area. In this respect, it was recently hypothesized that without the use of scientometric techniques, there will be a growing discontent among scientists for funding allocation policies [17, 18]. Therefore, the use of specific tools and benchmarking systems as shown here could be of help to implement transparency within funding allocation processes. This was the basis for the establishment of NewQIS, a scientific, non-financial platform that assesses research trends in socioeconomic important areas of science and research within delineated research projects [17, 18].
Since it is not possible to precisely analyze the global funding in this area, we cannot provide any information about funding. Therefore, the assumption the published articles represent associated research funding in this area is not justified. By contrast, it is generally accepted that the biomedical fields with the highest level of funding are represented by cardiovascular medicine, oncology and the nervous system. In countries such as the US, the UK or Germany, these fields also generate the highest output. The reason is probably simple: Investing more money in one field means generating new research positions and new projects which leads to an increased number of scientific publications in this field. However, as stated above, precise models and ratios of this relation do not exist.
When relating the present study to other fields of science, previously published NewQIS studies may be used for comparison. I.e. a recent study focussed on a scientometric analysis and combined density-equalizing mapping of environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) research . 6,580 ETS-related studies published between 1900 and 2008 were identified in the ISI database and a continuous increase of both quantitative and qualitative parameters was found. The combination with density-equalizing calculations demonstrated a leading position of the United States (2,959 items published) in terms of quantitative research activities . Charting techniques demonstrated that there are numerous bi- and multilateral networks between different countries and institutions in this field . Again, a leading position of American institutions was found. Interestingly, there are large similarities concerning the findings on country research productivity present between traffic medicine and ETS-related research .
However, also differing results were recently reported . I.e. one study that examined specific areas of major research activity using different organ systems reported major differences between countries. In a total of 5,527,558 published items. A dichotomy was present between Western countries such as the US, UK or Germany and Asian countries such as Japan, China or South Korea concerning research focuses .
With regard to the presently performed search routine in the general search, we tried to assess a large number of published items by enlarging the search terms using the Boolean operator, 'OR', with different terms related to traffic medicine including "traffic* securit*", "car crash*", "car accident*", "transport* accident*", "transport* crash*", "traffic* safet*", "car safet*", "vehicle crash*", "vehicle safet*". This is in contrast to other studies that used only one search term. However, since the used search terms can be summarized into the field of traffic medicine, the present approach appears to be useful in this area of research. Undoubtedly, our search strategy encompasses a number of articles that does not represent the overall number of studies dedicated to the field of traffic medicine. This is due to the inability of every bibliometric database study to identify all published items related to a specific field within a set of over 11,000,000 publications. We therefore performed a second search that specifically addressed the issue of public health and transport/traffic medicine. In this analysis more than 1,200 specific publications were identified. In general, the trends of the first, larger analysis were paralleled concerning key benchmarks such as general output figures, leading countries or networks.
In summary, it needs to be stated that traffic medicine is a multi-sectorial research area with important implications for public health. Research related to this field of science and medicine continues to increase annually but is relatively low in comparison to other research areas. The present data may provide helpful information for those who are tasked with improving research performance in this field.
We thank G. Volante for expert help. C. Scutaru has received a prize of the Deutscher Verkehrssicherheitsrat for conducting parts of this study.
- Ir P, Men C, Lucas H, Meessen B, Decoster K, Bloom G, Van Damme W: Self-reported serious illnesses in rural Cambodia: a cross-sectional survey. PLoS One. 2010, 5 (6): e10930-10.1371/journal.pone.0010930.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
- Eddleston M, Udayakumara N, Adhikari S, de Silva D, Sheriff MH, Waidyaratne DL: The importance of poisoning vs. road traffic injuries as a cause of death in rural Sri Lanka. PLoS One. 2007, 2 (7): e599-10.1371/journal.pone.0000599.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
- Donroe J, Tincopa M, Gilman RH, Brugge D, Moore DA: Pedestrian road traffic injuries in urban Peruvian children and adolescents: case control analyses of personal and environmental risk factors. PLoS One. 2008, 3 (9): e3166-10.1371/journal.pone.0003166.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
- Nantulya VM, Reich MR: The neglected epidemic: road traffic injuries in developing countries. BMJ. 2002, 324 (7346): 1139-1141. 10.1136/bmj.324.7346.1139.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
- Mohan D: Road safety in less-motorized environments: future concerns. Int J Epidemiol. 2002, 31 (3): 527-532. 10.1093/ije/31.3.527.View ArticlePubMed
- Sangowawa AO, Alagh BT, Ekanem SEU, Ebong IP, Faseru B, Adekunle BJ, Uchendu OC: An observational study of seatbelt use among vehicle occupants in Nigeria. Inj Prev. 16 (2): 85-89.
- Mathers C, Loncar D: Updated projections of global mortality and burden of disease, 2002–2030: data sources, methods and results. 2005, Geneva: World Health Organization
- Groneberg-Kloft B, Scutaru C, Kreiter C, Kolzow S, Fischer A, Quarcoo D: Institutional operating figures in basic and applied sciences: scientometric analysis of quantitative output benchmarking. Health Res Policy Syst. 2008, 6 (1): 6-10.1186/1478-4505-6-6.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
- Michon F, Tummers M: The dynamic interest in topics within the biomedical scientific community. PLoS One. 2009, 4 (8): e6544-10.1371/journal.pone.0006544.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
- Hannaford P: Assessing the quality of primary care research in the United kingdom: the 2008 research assessment exercise. Ann Fam Med. 2009, 7 (3): 277-278. 10.1370/afm.1009.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
- Scutaru C, Quarcoo D, Takemura M, Welte T, Fischer TC, Groneberg-Kloft B: Density-equalizing mapping and scientometric benchmarking in industrial health. Ind Health. 2010, 48 (2): 197-203. 10.2486/indhealth.48.197.View ArticlePubMed
- Smith DR: A 30-year citation analysis of bibliometric trends at the archives of environmental health, 1975–2004. Arch Environ Occup Health. 2009, 64: 43-54. 10.1080/19338240903293004.View ArticlePubMed
- Smith DR: Highly cited articles in environmental and occupational health, 1919–1960. Arch Environ Occup Health. 2009, 64: 32-42. 10.1080/19338240903286743.View ArticlePubMed
- Smith DR, Gehanno JF, Takahashi K: Bibliometric research in occupational health. Ind Health. 2008, 46 (6): 519-522. 10.2486/indhealth.46.519.View ArticlePubMed
- Tarkowski SM: Environmental health research in Europe: bibliometric analysis. Eur J Public Health. 2007, 17 (Suppl 1): 14-18.View ArticlePubMed
- Soteriades ES, Falagas ME: A bibliometric analysis in the fields of preventive medicine, occupational and environmental medicine, epidemiology, and public health. BMC Public Health. 2006, 6: 301-10.1186/1471-2458-6-301.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
- Groneberg-Kloft B, Quarcoo D, Scutaru C: Quality and quantity indices in science: use of visualization tools. EMBO Rep. 2009, 10 (8): 800-803.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
- Groneberg-Kloft B, Fischer TC, Quarcoo D, Scutaru C: New quality and quantity indices in science (NewQIS): the study protocol of an international project. J Occup Med Toxicol. 2009, 4: 16-10.1186/1745-6673-4-16.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
- Gastner MT, Newman ME: Diffusion-based method for producing density-equalizing maps. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004, 101 (20): 7499-7504. 10.1073/pnas.0400280101.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
- Groneberg-Kloft B, Scutaru C, Dinh QT, Welte T, Chung KF, Fischer A, Quarcoo D: Inter-disease comparison of research quantity and quality: bronchial asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Asthma. 2009, 46 (2): 147-152. 10.1080/02770900802503115.View ArticlePubMed
- Groneberg-Kloft B, Kreiter C, Welte T, Fischer A, Quarcoo D, Scutaru C: Interfield dysbalances in research input and output benchmarking: visualisation by density equalizing procedures. Int J Health Geogr. 2008, 7: 48-10.1186/1476-072X-7-48.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
- Milat AJ, Bauman AE, Redman S, Curac N: Public health research outputs from efficacy to dissemination: a bibliometric analysis. BMC Public Health. 2011, 11 (1): 934-10.1186/1471-2458-11-934.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
- Sanz-Casado E, Ramirez-de Santa Pau M, Suarez-Balseiro CA, Iribarren-Maestro I, de Pedro-Cuesta J: Trends in scientific activity addressing transmissible spongiform encephalopathies: a bibliometric study covering the period 1973–2002. BMC Public Health. 2006, 6: 245-10.1186/1471-2458-6-245.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
- Vitzthum K, Scutaru C, Musial-Bright L, Quarcoo D, Welte T, Spallek M, Groneberg-Kloft B: Scientometric analysis and combined density-equalizing mapping of environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) research. PLoS One. 2010, 5 (6): e11254-10.1371/journal.pone.0011254.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/13/541/prepub
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.