Skip to main content

Table 1 Different personal measurement methods at baseline, follow-up 1 and follow-up 2

From: Impact of a smoking ban in hospitality venues on second hand smoke exposure: a comparison of exposure assessment methods

 

Baseline

Follow-up 1

Follow-up 2

 

n

Arithmetic mean (95% CI)

n

Arithmetic mean (95% CI)

n

Arithmetic mean (95% CI)

p-Value

Personal badge (cigarette equivalents/day)

Intervention group

53

2.18 (1.31 to 3.05)

41

0.53 (0.39 to 0.67)

41

0.25 (0.13 to 0.36)

<0.001

Control Groups I + III

20

1.69 (0.74 to 2.64)

11

1.17 (0.57 to 1.77)

5

1.22 (0.10 to 2.34)

0.892

Control Group II

14

0.41 (0.25 to 0.57)

     

Work place badge (cigarette equivalents/day)*

Intervention group

50

4.82 (3.14 to 6.50)

40

0.27 (0.19 to 0.34)

36

0.31 (0.17 to 0.46)

<0.001

Control Group I

6

3.85 (−0.51 to 8.21)

2

2.15 (−23.66 to 27.96)

1

0.22

0.561

Control Group II

12

0.27 (0.08 to 0.47)

     

Time weighted average of work badge (cigarette equivalents/day)*

Intervention group

50

2.65 (1.69 to 3.62)

40

0.15 (0.11 to 0.20)

36

0.18 (0.10 to 0.27)

<0.001

Control Group I

6

2.24 (−0.30 to 4.79)

2

1.25 (−13.80 to 16.31)

1

0.30

0.561

Control Group II

12

0.14 (0.03 to 0.25)

     

Salivary nicotine (ng/ml)

Intervention group

44

1.99 (0.98 to 3.00)

35

2.42 (−0.01 to 4.86)

36

2.81 (−0.12 to 5.75)

0.227

Control Groups I + III

14

1.45 (−0.05 to 2.95)

5

4.24 (−5.49 to 13.97)

1

7.80

0.699

Control Group II

5

2.38 (−3.95 to 8.71)

     

Salivary cotinine (ng/ml)

Intervention group

44

0.67 (0.04 to 1.30)

35

2.75 (0.32 to 5.17)

36

0.81 (0.00 to 1.61)

0.243

Control Groups I + III

14

1.54 (−0.43 to 3.51)

5

3.84 (−2.56 to 10.24)

1

0.13

0.329

Control Group II

5

2.82 (−4.73 to 10.37)

     
  1. *no data for control group III.
  2. 1if two persons worked in the same venue, this badge was counted double.