A qualitative exploration of Malaysian cancer patients’ perceptions of cancer screening
© Farooqui et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 5 September 2012
Accepted: 15 January 2013
Published: 18 January 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|5 Sep 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|4 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - sarah flanagan|
|10 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sajid Bashir|
|16 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Harith Qazaz|
|14 Nov 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Fahad Saleem|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|14 Nov 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|15 Nov 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - sarah flanagan|
|28 Nov 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Fahad Saleem|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|28 Nov 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|16 Dec 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Fahad Saleem|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|16 Dec 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|15 Jan 2013||Editorially accepted|
|18 Jan 2013||Article published||10.1186/1471-2458-13-48|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.