Baseline predictors of treatment outcome in Internet-based alcohol interventions: a recursive partitioning analysis alongside a randomized trial
© Blankers et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 17 September 2012
Accepted: 12 March 2013
Published: 7 May 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|17 Sep 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|2 Nov 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Katherine Hardcastle|
|29 Nov 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Mauro Ceccanti|
|8 Jan 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sally Rooke|
|20 Jan 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sara Wood|
|8 Feb 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Matthijs Blankers|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|8 Feb 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|12 Feb 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Katherine Hardcastle|
|20 Feb 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Matthijs Blankers|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|20 Feb 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|12 Mar 2013||Editorially accepted|
|7 May 2013||Article published||10.1186/1471-2458-13-455|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.