A past Haff disease outbreak associated with eating freshwater pomfret in South China

  • Xi Huang1, 2,

    Affiliated with

    • Yipeng Li3,

      Affiliated with

      • Qiong Huang1Email author,

        Affiliated with

        • Junhua Liang1,

          Affiliated with

          • Chunsui Liang1,

            Affiliated with

            • Bifeng Chen1,

              Affiliated with

              • Lingling Lu1,

                Affiliated with

                • Xiaoling Deng1,

                  Affiliated with

                  • Zihui Chen4,

                    Affiliated with

                    • Yonghui Zhang1Email author,

                      Affiliated with

                      • Yongning Wu5 and

                        Affiliated with

                        • Bing Shao6

                          Affiliated with

                          BMC Public Health201313:447

                          DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-447

                          Received: 28 September 2012

                          Accepted: 30 April 2013

                          Published: 6 May 2013

                          Abstract

                          Background

                          Haff disease is unexplained rhabdomyolysis caused by consumption of fishery products in the previous 24 h. It was first identified in Europe in 1924 but the condition is extremely rare in China. Here we describe a past outbreak of acute food borne muscle poisoning that occurred in Guangdong Province (South China) in 2009.

                          Methods

                          The first full outbreak of Haff disease reported in Jiangsu Province (East China) in 2010, indicated that the incidence of the disease may be increasing in China. We, therefore first retrospectively reviewed epidemiologic, trace-back, environmental studies, and laboratory analyses, including oral toxicity testing to ascertain risk and chemical analysis to identify toxin(s), from the 2009 Guangdong outbreak. Then we compared data from the 2009 outbreak with data from all other Haff disease outbreaks that were available.

                          Results

                          Clinical symptoms and laboratory findings indicated that the 2009 Guangdong outbreak disease was consistent with rhabdomyolysis. Epidemiologic, trace-back, environmental studies and laboratory analyses implied that the disease was caused by freshwater Pomfrets consumed prior to the onset of symptoms. We also identified common factors between the 2009 Guangdong outbreak and previous Haff disease outbreaks reported around the world, while as with other similar outbreaks, the exact etiological factor(s) of the disease remains unknown.

                          Conclusions

                          The 2009 Guangdong outbreak of ‘muscle poisoning’ was retrospectively identified as an outbreak of Haff disease. This comprised the highest number of cases reported in China thus far. Food borne diseases emerging in this unusual form and the irregular pattern of outbreaks present an ongoing public health risk, highlighting the need for improved surveillance and diagnostic methodology.

                          Background

                          Rhabdomyolysis, is characterized by disintegration of striated muscle fibers resulting in intracellular contents being excreted into the circulatory system. It is not an uncommon occurrence but can be potentially life-threatening, especially if the intracellular contents are filtered by the glomerulus, as myoglobin obstructs the renal tubules causing acute renal failure [13]. Physical symptoms of rhabdomyolysis include profound muscular pain and weakness, swelling, stiffness, cramps, and sometimes tea-colored urine. The etiology of rhabdomyolysis is diverse being classified as traumatic, exercise-induced, toxicological, environmental, metabolic, infectious, immunologic, pharmacotherapeutic, and inherited [1]. A 5-fold or greater increase in serum creatine kinase (CK), in the absence of heart or brain diseases, and a CK muscle/brain (MB) fraction < 5%, are widely accepted diagnostic criteria [2, 4].

                          Haff disease, the occurrence of unexplained rhabdomyolysis in a person who has consumed cooked fishery products within the previous 24 h, is a relatively uncommon condition [5]. It was first identified in 1924 near the Haff shores along the Baltic Coast in East Prussia. Additional cases and outbreaks were subsequently described in the same region, and also in several other countries [6]. Haff disease has seldom been reported in China or Asia, and outbreaks have been even more uncommon. On 27 October 2009, there was an outbreak of unexplained myalgia after consumption of freshwater Pomfret (Colossoma brachypomum), in a town in Lianzhou County, Guangdong Province, South China. The outbreak was described as an incident of acute muscle poisoning. Between July and August, 2010, a crayfish-related Haff disease outbreak involving 23 cases, was reported in Nanjing (Provincial Capital city), Jiangsu Province, in East China [7]. This second outbreak focused our attention towards the risks of Haff disease in China. It also prompted us to review Haff disease more thoroughly. Part of this research involved a retrospective review of the 2009 Guangdong outbreak.

                          Methods

                          Outbreak identification

                          In the early morning of 27 October, 2009, six people presenting with unexplained generalized myalgia, weakness and fatigue, were admitted to hospital in a small town named Jiubei, Lianzhou County, Qingyuan Prefectural City, Guangdong Province, China. Each of them reported recent consumption of locally purchased freshwater Pomfrets. The symptoms became more severe and the patients were transferred from the town hospital to a county hospital. By 10.00 h on 27 October, 35 other patients exposed to the same food were identified.

                          The outbreak was reported from hospital to the Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (CDCs) at county, prefectural and provincial level in Guangdong. Investigations were expedited without delay.

                          Epidemiologic studies

                          Based on preliminary information gained from the initial cases, the outbreak case was defined by the presence of at least one of the following symptoms since 26 October 2009: muscle pain, weakness, nausea, neck or waist or back ache, or limb weakness. Active surveillance for similar patients in local hospitals, and enquiries among residents were used to find additional cases. All cases were interviewed and demographic and clinical information, food-related and personal risk factors were documented [8]. Physicians dealing with patients were interviewed, and the medical records and clinical laboratory values were reviewed and analyzed. Descriptive epidemiologic, clinical and laboratory characters were compared between genders.

                          For hypotheses generation, the patients were further interviewed using a uniform detailed questionnaire which provided information on consumption of different food items, focusing on the freshwater Pomfrets that had been mentioned by all patients.

                          Trace-back and environmental investigations

                          By interviewing patients, local residents, fish sellers and fisherman, a trace-back investigation of the distribution pathway for the implicated food item was conducted. Environmental investigations along the distribution chain were performed to determine the possible source of contamination. Food (fish) and environmental (water and soil) samples were collected and sent for laboratory analysis.

                          Animal tests

                          Animal tests and chemical analysis were used to ascertain risk and etiological factor(s) during outbreak investigations. Suspected Pomfrets were sampled from the reservoir where they were caught, and from patients’ leftovers. Bighead carp cultivated from the same reservoir and Pomfrets obtained from another aquaculture site were collected as controls. Aquaculture water (surface and bottom water and water from the outlet of a sewage drain) was sampled and compared with control water samples from other sites.

                          Fish and water samples were subjected to acute oral toxicity tests for toxins, following method and procedures of Chinese National Food Safety Standard ‘Procedures for toxicological assessment of food’ (GB 15193.1-2003), and using ‘Maximal Tolerate Dose’ (MTD). Imitating the usual cooking process, fish samples were steamed at 100°C for 10 to 15 min till well done, and the muscle parts were minced into a meat paste. Water samples were concentrated 10 times (at 60°C and at 76 mmHg pressure). The prepared samples were administered to SPF BALB/c mice via oral gavage at the MTD of 0.3 mL/10 g every 4 h. Each mouse was subjected to three doses. The behavior and survival of the treated mice were observed, and gross anatomy was further done on, if any, dead mouse. The 10 groups of 20 SPF BALB/c mice (half male and half female) used for these experiments were obtained from Guangdong Provincial Medical Experimental Animal Centre (Guangzhou, China). The mice were housed and treated according to the guidelines for mouse care from Guangdong Provincial Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (Guangdong Provincial CDC) Animal Care and Use Committee.

                          Chemical analyses

                          Fish, water and soil samples were tested for microcystin (LR, RR, YR, LF), paralytic shellfish poison (PSP), ractopamine, fluoride (F-), chloride (CL-), nitrate (NO3 -), nitrite (NO2 -), sulphate (SO4 2-), gelsemine, histamine, and 27 heavy metals including: beryllium (Be), sodium (Na), magnesium (Mg), aluminum (Al), potassium (K), calcium (Ca), vanadium (V), chromium (Cr), manganese (Mn), iron (Fe), cobalt (Co), nickel (Ni), copper (Cu), zinc (Zn), arsenic (As), selenium (Se), molybdenum (Mo), silver (Ag), cadmium (Cd), tin (Sn), antimony (Sb), barium (Ba), thallium (Tl), lead (Pb), thorium (Th), uranium (U), by using chemical analyses technologies and methods including Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS), Iron Chromatography (IC), Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS), colorimetric method, Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS) and Atomic Fluorescence Spectrometry (AFS).

                          Identification of specific risk factors

                          Based on data from other studies, we carried out a retrospective cohort analysis using freshwater Pomfret consumption as a risk factor single variable. The analysis involved 3857 residents of Jiubei (patients and healthy individuals) who had been staying in town and who had a limited period of exposure. The residents were interviewed to ascertain if they had consumed locally sold freshwater Pomfret. Data from 24 patients who had consumed Pomfret were used to determine dose–response relationships.

                          The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Guangdong Provincial CDC. Oral informed consent to participate in the study was obtained from all study participants (including patients, physicians and local residents enrolled in our studies).

                          Statistical analyses

                          Statistical analysis was conducted using MS Excel, and SPSS version 13.0 statistical software. Between-group comparisons were analyzed using Fisher’s Exact tests and Pearson chi-square tests, and the Mann–Whitney U test was used to analyze gender distributions. Curve estimation regression was used to determine dose–response relationships. Values of P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

                          Results

                          Epidemiology characteristics

                          A total of 54 case-patients were identified, among whom 44 were hospitalized. The median length of hospital stay was 3.2 days (range: 1 to 13 days). Only one case was classified as being severe and there were no deaths. The disease onset occurred between 19.00 h on 26 October and 11.00 h on 31 October 2009. The incidence of new cases appeared to peak on the evening of 26 October (Figure 1). The majority of cases were residents of Lianzhou County, and were concentrated in Jiubei town. There were four cases from Liannan, a neighboring county of Lianzhou. Among case-patients, approximately two thirds of the cases were male (male cases: 36/54, 66.7%; female cases: 18/54, 33.3%). Fifty two of the 54 patients were adults (i.e. >18 years of age). The median age of the total population was 43 years (range: 4 to 74 years), and the median age is higher for female case patients than for male cases patients (43 vs. 42 years, range 22 to 74 years vs. 4 to 71 years, a nonsignificant difference, P = 0.291) (Table 1). All patients recovered without sequelae and all had been discharged by 9 November 2009. No similar symptoms were reported among these patients afterwards.
                          http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2458-13-447/MediaObjects/12889_2012_5349_Fig1_HTML.jpg
                          Figure 1

                          Epidemiologic curve of the outbreak occurred in town of Lianzhou, Guangdong, South China, 2009.

                          Table 1

                          Demographic and clinical characteristics and initial laboratory test results from patients in town of Lianzhou presenting with unexplained myalgia in 2009 *

                          Variable

                          Total (n = 54)

                          Male (n = 36)

                          Female (n = 18)

                          P-value*

                          Age, years

                             

                          0.291

                          Mean

                          42

                          41

                          45

                           

                          Median

                          43

                          42

                          43

                           

                          Range

                          4-74

                          4-71

                          22-74

                           

                          Clinical characteristics, n(%)

                          Weakness

                          45 (83.3)

                          30 (83.3)

                          15 (83.3)

                          1.000

                          Myalgia

                          41 (75.9)

                          28 (77.8)

                          13 (72.2)

                          0.740

                          Nausea

                          34 (63.0)

                          23 (63.9)

                          11 (61.1)

                          0.842

                          Abdominal pain

                          34 (63.0)

                          24 (66.7)

                          10 (55.6)

                          0.425

                          Laboratory test values, mean ± SD

                          Serological test

                          α-HBDH, U/L

                          357.9 ± 309.6

                          394.1 ± 342.4

                          245.7 ± 129.1

                          0.268

                          CK, U/L

                          2812.3 ± 3350.8

                          3239.5 ± 3674.8

                          1488.1 ± 1520.0

                          0.213

                          AST, U/L

                          166.7 ± 227.9

                          193.8 ± 255.4

                          82.6 ± 55.6

                          0.514

                          CK-MB, U/L

                          99.2 ± 127.0

                          114.5 ± 141.0

                          51.9 ± 45.9

                          0.208

                          CK-MB Fraction,%

                          6.0 ± 5.4

                          5.8 ± 5.1

                          6.8 ± 6.2

                          0.632

                          LDH,U/L

                          428.4 ± 362.0

                          473.7 ± 400.2

                          288.1 ± 137.9

                          0.302

                          TBA, μmol/L

                          25.5 ± 7.00

                          23.8 ± 6.9

                          30.6 ± 4.1

                          0.006

                          ALT, U/L

                          64.1 ± 65.8

                          67.2 ± 72.5

                          54.6 ± 39.3

                          0.927

                          Renal function test

                          Cr, μmol/L

                          74.9 ± 15.3

                          77.0 ± 15.1

                          67.5 ± 14.9

                          0.133

                          BUN, mmol/L

                          5.3 ± 1.5

                          5.5 ± 1.3

                          4.4 ± 1.6

                          0.048

                          Urinalysis

                          SG

                          1.02 ± 0.007

                          1.021 ± 0.007

                          1.020 ± 0.008

                          0.830

                          *: Data of demographic and clinical characteristics are for all patients identified; data of laboratory test values are for patients who presented to the county level hospital and were taken blood samples for tests.

                          *: Fisher’s Exact Test and Pearson Chi-Square Test were used for proportions, the Mann–Whitney U test was used for gender distribution.

                          Seven family clusters involving 20 cases were identified among case-patients. A cluster of 15 adult male patients with a median age of 36 years (range: 19 to 62 years) was identified at a construction site. Within this subgroup, 17 construction workers had consumed Pomfrets together at supper on 26 October. An hour later, one member of the group developed waist and back ache, followed by abdominal pain, dry mouth and weakness. His 14 workmates each developed similar symptoms soon after. The attack rate in this subgroup was 88.2% (15/17) and the median incubation period was 5.5 h (range: 1 to 13 h). All 15 workers had been admitted to hospital by 11.00 h on 27 October 2009.

                          Clinical characteristics

                          As shown in Table 1, the most common presenting symptoms were weakness (45 patients, 83.3%), myalgia (41patients, 75.9%), nausea (34 patients, 63.0%) and abdominal pain (34 patients, 63.0%). Other symptoms included dry mouth (25 patients, 46.3%), vomiting (25 patients, 46.3%), diarrhea (18 patients, 33.3%), dizziness (18 patients, 33.3%) and headache (12 patients, 22.2%).

                          In some cases blood samples were collected at the time of first presentation. Analysis indicated that levels of serum CK, α-hydroxy butyrate dehydrogenase (α-HBDH), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), CK-MB, lactic dehydrogenase (LDH), total bile acid (TBA), and alanine aminotransferase (ALT), were all elevated. In addition, the majority of patients (82.9%) presented with an MB fraction < 5% (Table 2).
                          Table 2

                          Initial laboratory test values for patients§ in towns of Lianzhou with unexplained myalgia in 2009

                          Variable

                          No.

                          Mean

                          Median

                          Minimum

                          Maximum

                          Normal range

                          Percentage abnormal%

                          Serological test

                          α-HBDH-U/L

                          37

                          366.8

                          191.0

                          109.0

                          1223.0

                          74-140

                          89.2

                          CK-U/L

                          41

                          2812.3

                          1302.0

                          92.0

                          11696.0

                          25-200

                          85.4

                          AST-U/L

                          38

                          175.3

                          74.8

                          19.5

                          1008.4

                          5-35

                          76.3

                          CK-MB-U/L

                          41

                          99.2

                          44.1

                          12.9

                          500.1

                          0-28

                          65.9

                          CK-MB fraction%

                          41

                          6.0

                          4.2

                          0.2

                          20.6

                          < 5%

                          17.1

                          LDH-U/L

                          37

                          447.8

                          290.0

                          132.0

                          1504.0

                          80-285

                          61.3

                          TBA-μmol/L

                          33

                          24.9

                          25.0

                          8.0

                          34.8

                          1.79-7.14

                          93.9

                          ALT-U/L

                          36

                          63.8

                          42.9

                          9.2

                          320.4

                          5-40

                          55.6

                          Renal function test

                          Cr, μmol/L

                          36

                          74.7

                          74

                          39

                          104

                          50-120

                          5.6

                          BUN, mmol/L

                          36

                          5.27

                          5.5

                          2.5

                          8.7

                          1.79-7.14

                          8.3

                          Urinalysis

                          SG

                          30

                          1.021

                          1.020

                          1.005

                          1.030

                          1.005-1.025

                          16.7

                          §: Only patients with blood test results were analyzed.

                          : No. of patients with available serological testing data.

                          :No. of patients with abnormalities in serological testing results/No. of patients with available serological testing data.

                          Available results of renal function test showed creatinine (Cr) levels of some patients remained normal, ranging from 39 μmol/L to 104 μmol/L (reference range: 50–120 μmol/L), and only four patients presented slightly elevated blood urine nitrogen (BUN).

                          Routine hematology tests were normal, indicating the absence of infection. No significant differences were identified between genders (Table 2).

                          No patients had reported or developed tea-colored urine, and no significant abnormalities were seen in available routine urinalysis of most patients, while five out of 30 patients (with routine urinalysis results) had elevated specific gravity (SG) (1.030, normal 1.025); five got positive in urine occult blood test (graded as 1+ to 3+), and available microscopic analysis on majority of the patients showed few, if any, red blood cells, except the patient with 3 ± positive to hemoglobin (26 RBC/μl in urinary sediment); and eight present slightly turbid urine color. No sustained decrease of urine output was reported.

                          Treatment consisted of intravenous hydration, with administration of hepatic and stomach protective agents as well as diuretics. The drugs administered included glucurolactone, pantoprazole, furosemide, bicarbonate, reduced glutathione, inosine, cimetidine, calcium gluconate, and potassium chloride.

                          Risk factors and source of disease

                          None of the patients had recently travelled out of town, and none had related medical histories such as trauma, underlying cardiovascular and/or brain diseases, medications. The only common factor was exposure to Pomfrets bought from local markets on 26 October, 2009. In all cases the fish were cooked thoroughly without heads or internal organs. There were no reports that the fish had an unusual odor or taste. The patients consumed the Pomfrets for supper on 26 October, or for breakfast on 27 October, by themselves or with family members or workmates. The estimated weight of fish eaten ranged from 50 to 700 g and was related to the severity of muscle pain. Based on the time to disease onset relative to the consumption of the suspect meals, the median incubation period of the disease was estimated to be 7 h (range: 10 min to 41.5 h).

                          Tracing investigations, indicated that the suspect Pomfrets had been cultivated with Silver carp (Hypophthalmichthys molitrix), Grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella), and bighead carp (Aristichthys nobilis), in a reservoir named ‘Lengshuidong’. Though it was the correct season, the Pomfrets caught from the reservoir were much smaller (mostly < 200 g) than the expected average weight (> 1 kg), and were also smaller than Pomfrets from the same batch of fish fry that had been cultivated elsewhere.

                          As these fish were too small to be sold at a favorable price, the wholesalers purchased other kinds of fish from the reservoir for resale in Lianzhou. No disease was reported after consumption of these other species. The low weight Pomfrets were sold at very low prices to the residents of three villages of Jiubei. The four patients from Liannan County had bought and consumed Pomfrets from the same lot.

                          Figure 2 shows the results of tracing investigations for Pomfrets and other fish cultivated at the same reservoir. The reservoir for fish aquaculture covered about 26.67 hectares and was at least three meters deep during the wet season, being supplied by water coming from the surrounding mountains. No industrial or mining contamination was possible, but there was a sty with 400 pigs at the bank of the reservoir. This is a typical method of cultivation in rural areas of China, with the feces and waste products of the livestock discharging into the reservoir as fish food. The reservoir had been used to cultivate Pomfret and other kinds of fish since 2007. No unexpected fish or animal deaths had been reported in the reservoir area.
                          http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2458-13-447/MediaObjects/12889_2012_5349_Fig2_HTML.jpg
                          Figure 2

                          Network graphic on the tracing investigating of fish caught from Lengshuidong reservoir, in outbreak occurred in town of lianzhou, Guangdong, South China, 2009.

                          Oral toxicity testing

                          Five groups of mice (A to E) were subjected to different fish samples. Groups A and B were subjected to Pomfrets from Lengshuidong reservoir, Group C were subjected to patients’ leftovers and Groups D and E were respectively subjected to bighead carp from the same reservoir and to Pomfrets cultivated in a nearby pond. Another five groups of mice (F to J) were subjected to water samples collected from surface (F), bottom (G) and sewage draining outlet (H) of the Lengshuidong reservoir. Groups I and J were subjected to water collected from another reservoir.

                          Two hours after administration, mice in Groups A and C showed evidence of deteriorating mental states; they became less active, and developed akinesia in the hind limbs, causing them to lie down or bend over. Three mice died after 22 h (two in Group A and one in Group C), but had no obvious abnormalities in gross anatomy. NO significant abnormalities were seen in mice from any of the other groups.

                          Chemical analyses

                          Chemical analyses of Pomfret samples collected from Lengshuidong reservoir or from patients’ leftovers, together with water and soil samples on possible toxins and metals were either negative or below toxicity thresholds.

                          Study of the specific risk factors

                          A retrospective cohort study on 3,857 Jiubei residents revealed that 159 subjects had consumed Pomfrets on 26 October 2009, of whom 50 (excluding the four Liannan cases) fell ill. This resulted in an attack rate of 31.5% (50/159). None of the patients who did not consume Pomfrets presented with similar symptoms (P < 0.001 Fisher exact test). Thus, neither the relative risk nor 95% confidence interval could be calculated.

                          A dose response relationship was demonstrated between the weight of Pomfret consumed and elevated enzymes levels including CK-MB (R 2 = 0.713, P < 0.001), and AST (R 2 = 0.387, P = 0.019), CK (R 2 = 0.319, P = 0.049) by fitting cubic model. Higher weights of fish consumption were associated with higher enzyme activity and more severe symptoms.

                          Control measures

                          On the afternoon of 27 October 2009, local government and public health departments issued a warrant prohibiting fishing, selling and consumption of Pomfrets from Lengshuidong reservoir. They also alerted hospitals to search their medical records as soon as possible to identify patients who had consumed Pomfrets and felt uncomfortable afterwards. These procedures ensured that no new case emerged after 2 November 2009 (Figure 1).

                          Discussion

                          After being initially identified in Europe in 1924, a second Haff disease epidemic was reported in the same region in 1932. Similar epidemics and/or sporadic cases were reported in Sweden, Russia. In the United States, there were two cases a year reported between 1984 and 1986. In 1997 there were six cases, in 2009 there were nine cases and in 2011 there were three cases. In China, six cases of the disease were reported in 2000, an outbreak consisted of 23 cases was occurred in 2010, in Brazil 25 cases were reported in 2008 and in Japan 13 cases were reported in 2009 [916].

                          Typical clinical features of the condition comprise severe generalized muscle pain and tenderness with weakness, 5-times or greater elevation in levels of serum CK, with a CK muscle/brain (MB) fraction < 5% [6]. No accompanying fever, neurological, hepatic and/or splenic abnormalities are observed. Most patients recover without sequelae, and very few die. Recent ingestion of cooked fishery product is the culprit in most cases, with incubation periods generally ranging from 6 to 8 h [5, 9, 12]. Reported fishery products include buffalo fish (Ictiobus cyprinellus), burbot, eel, pike, crayfish, salmon, silver dollars (Mylossoma spp.), black-finned colossoma (Colossoma macropomum), freshwater pompano (Piaractus brachypomus), and marine box fish, all of which are predominantly bottom-feeding omnivors [3, 5, 9, 13, 16].

                          The absence of fever and the fact that fishery products were cooked thoroughly excludes the possibility of known infectious causes. Proposals that the etiologies may include arsenic [5] or palytoxin [9] remain unconfirmed [5, 10].

                          Thorough investigation into previous Haff disease epidemics indicated that the 2009 outbreak in South China was not simply an incident of acute muscle poisoning but was an outbreak of Haff disease itself. This conclusion was based on the clinical characteristics, which included typical symptoms and clinical laboratory findings associated with rhabdomyolysis. All affected patients reported consumption of self-prepared Pomfrets in the 24 h before the onset of symptoms. Some of the cases occurred in clusters, and the majority had a sudden onset with a median incubation period of only 7 h. Subjects from the same region who had not consumed Pomfrets that day did not present with similar symptoms. Experimental studies indicated that the Pomfrets not only caused human illness, but also intoxicated laboratory mice. Pomfret, in common with other fishery products that have been reported to cause Haff disease, is a bottom-feeder that has the potential to accumulate environmental toxins.

                          Conclusions

                          This study identified a previously misdiagnosed and neglected outbreak of Haff disease which comprised the highest number of reported cases to date in China or Asia. Analysis of this outbreak indicated that Haff disease can migrate, as it has already traveled from Haff Shore in the Baltic to Asia. The disease not only occurs in sporadic cases or clusters, but also in relatively large-scale outbreaks. It is spread by wild fishery products, as well as by fish farmed from aquaculture centres. The toxin(s) responsible for Haff disease is fishery product borne, heat-stable and cannot be identified by smell or taste [5, 7]. The outbreak also highlights the risks of recurring food borne diseases, such as Haff disease, to the public, as increasing numbers of health-conscious subjects prefer fish diets.

                          The potential for misdiagnosing Haff disease is considerable, and the toxin itself has yet to be identified. In the meantime there is a clear need for sensitive, ongoing surveillance procedures as well as precise diagnostic methods, and effective precautionary procedures. Our retrospective analysis indicated that, in addition to a limited knowledge base on unusual diseases, separation between epidemiological and clinical investigations led to passive actions being taken. High dependency on laboratory results continues to be the norm in food borne outbreak investigations in China and this alone may hinder accurate diagnosis.

                          Limitation of the study

                          Since our study was based on past time investigations and comparisons, some limitations cannot be ignored: first, separation between epidemiological and clinical investigations led to challenging of the original diagnosis and clinical analyses during outbreak impossible, and also resulted in missing of some important clinical data. Second, the retrospective cohort study was limited for methodological reasons to the exposure, the freshwater Pomfret, that were able to explain a large population of cases, but neglected other variables which might possibly be significant. Third, limitation of knowledge on Haff disease and insufficiency of fish samples during outbreak made the animal tests were only used to ascertain that the suspected Pomfrets were toxic, and no further analyses on toxic animals were done to identify the consistency with toxic patients.

                          Abbreviations

                          CK: 

                          Creatine kinase

                          CDC: 

                          Centre for disease control and prevention

                          MTD: 

                          Maximal tolerate dose

                          α-HBDH: 

                          α-hydroxy butyrate dehydrogenase

                          AST: 

                          Aspartate aminotransferase

                          LDH: 

                          Lactic dehydrogenase

                          TBA: 

                          Total bile acid

                          ALT: 

                          Alanine aminotransferase

                          Cr: 

                          Creatinine

                          BUN: 

                          Blood urine nitrogen

                          SG: 

                          Specific gravity

                          LC-MS: 

                          Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry

                          IC: 

                          Iron chromatography

                          GC-MS: 

                          Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry

                          ICP-MS: 

                          Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry

                          AFS: 

                          Atomic fluorescence spectrometry

                          Declarations

                          Acknowledgements

                          We thank professionals from Lianzhou CDC for keeping up notification requirements on public health incidents; the clinicians of Lianzhou People’s Hospital for providing detailed information regarding the disease and treatments; the professionals from Shenzhen CDC and Zhejiang Provincial CDC for assisting chemical analyses; officers of Lianzhou Government, Agricultural Department and Health Department for coordination the investigations, and for providing targeted control measures at the time of the outbreak. We are also indebted to Prof. Shengyong Wang, Ning Wang, Ruiheng Xu for their expert advice and suggestions on outbreak retrospection, and to Dr Corina for commenting on and reviewing the manuscript, as well as to Mr. Zhiqing Nie for statistical review.

                          Financial disclosure

                          The research was funded by Ministry of Science and Technology in China (project number 200902009), the National ‘Twelfth Five-Year’ Plan for Science and Technology Support (project number 2011BAK10B06), and Guangdong Science and Technology Department (2011 research project: Research Centre on Health Response Technology of Food Safety Emergency).

                          Authors’ Affiliations

                          (1)
                          Guangdong Provincial Centre for Disease Control and Prevention
                          (2)
                          School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University
                          (3)
                          Jiangmen Prefectural Centre for Disease Control and Prevention
                          (4)
                          Guangdong Provincial Institute of Public Health
                          (5)
                          National Centre for Food Safety Risk Assessment
                          (6)
                          Beijing Centre for Disease Control and Prevention

                          References

                          1. Meister J, Reddy K: Rhabdomyolysis: an overview. Am J Nurs 2002,102(2):75. 77, 79PubMedView Article
                          2. Khan FY: Rhabdomyolysis: a review of the literature. Neth J Med 2009,67(9):272–283.PubMed
                          3. Yumul R, Steen SN, Osibamiro-Sedun A, Windokun A, Sapien RL: Rhabdomyolysis: a historical review with two illustrative cases. Trauma Care 2004, 14:143–147.
                          4. Ma N, Li FQ, Li N, Sui HX: Review on the research of foodborne rhabdomyolysis syndrome. Chin J of Food Hygiene 2010,22(6):564–567. (in Chinese)
                          5. Buchholz U, Mouzin E, Dickey R, Moolenaar R, Sass N, Mascola L: Haff disease: from the Baltic Sea to the US shore. Emerg Infect Dis 2000, 6:192–195.PubMedView Article
                          6. Solomon M: Haff disease. Arch Intern Med 1990,150(3):683.PubMedView Article
                          7. Zhang B, Yang G, Yu XB, Mao HJ, Xing CY, Liu J: Haff disease after eating crayfish in East China. Intern Med 2012, 51:487–489.PubMedView Article
                          8. World Health Organization: Foodborne disease outbreaks: guidelines for investigation and control. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2008.
                          9. Langley RL, Bobbitt WH: Haff disease after eating salmon. Southern Med J 2007,100(11):1147–1150.PubMedView Article
                          10. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Haff disease associated with eating buffalo fish-United States, 1997. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1998,47(50):1091–1093.
                          11. Tsironi M, Andriopoulos P, Deftereos S, Vassilopoulos A, Asimakopoulos G, Aessopos A: The patient with rhabdomyolysis: have you considered quail poisoning? CMAJ 2004,171(4):325–326.PubMed
                          12. Krishna N, Wood J: It looked like a myocardial infarction after eating crawfish…Ever heard of Haff disease? Louisiana Morbidity Report 2001,12(3):1–2.
                          13. dos Santos MC, de Albuquerque BC, Pinto RC, Aquiar GP, Lescano AG, Santos JH, Alecrim M: Outbreak of haff diease in the Brazilian Amazon. Pan Am J Public Health 2009,26(5):469–470.View Article
                          14. Taniyama S, Sagara T, Nishio S, Kuroki R, Asakawa M, Noguchi T, Yamasaki S, Takatani T, Arakawa O: Survey of food poisoning incidents in Japan due to ingestion of marine Boxfish, along with their toxicity. Shokuhin Eiseiqaku Zasshi 2009,50(5):270–277.View Article
                          15. Offerman RS, Bodle EE: A severe case of Haff disease after eating buffalo fish in Northern California. 2011. [10th Scientific Congress of the APAMT]
                          16. New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene: Haff disease: rhadomyolysis associated with fish consumption. 2011. Advisory #26 2011, Nov. 22
                          17. Pre-publication history

                            1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://​www.​biomedcentral.​com/​1471-2458/​13/​447/​prepub

                          Copyright

                          © Huang et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

                          This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​2.​0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.