Understanding cervical cancer screening among lesbians: a national survey
© Tracy et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 19 July 2012
Accepted: 22 April 2013
Published: 4 May 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|19 Jul 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|30 Jul 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Nicholas Schluterman|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|30 Jul 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|11 Oct 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Nicholas Schluterman|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|11 Oct 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|7 Dec 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ruth McNair|
|18 Feb 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Susan Johnson|
|20 Mar 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Nicholas Schluterman|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|20 Mar 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|22 Apr 2013||Editorially accepted|
|4 May 2013||Article published||10.1186/1471-2458-13-442|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.