From: Development, scoring, and reliability of the Microscale Audit of Pedestrian Streetscapes (MAPS)
Subscale | # items (range) | Sample items* and overall subscale description | Mean (SD) | ICC, % Agreement | Range of item ICC or Kappa |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Positive Subscales | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Crosswalk Amenities/Qualities | 9 (0–4) | Crosswalk characteristics (e.g., marked crosswalk, high visibility markings) | .987 (1.08) | .807, 70.2% | -.012 (curb extensions) - .816 |
Curb Quality/Presence | 2 (0–2) | Pre- and post-crossing curb lining up with crossing | 1.33 (.91) | .684, 82.4% | .648-.651 |
Intersection Control and Signage | 10 (0–7) | Stop signs, pedestrian walk signals | 1.28 (1.31) | .752, 71.6% | .327 (traffic circle) - .811 |
Overall Positive Crossing Characteristics Subscale | 3 subscales (0–12) | Sum of subscales: crosswalk amenities/qualities, curb quality/presence, intersection control and signage | 3.61 (2.53) | .828, 54.2% | See above |
Negative Subscales | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Lanes/Road Width of Crossing | 1 (0–2) | Distance of crossing leg (# lanes wide, trichotomized) | .764 (.581) | .525, 72.9% | n/a |
Crossing Impediments | 7 (0–4) | No curb ramp, gutters in crossing, faded/worn crosswalk markings | 1.14 (1.17) | .728, 72.9% | .188 (poor visibility at corners) - .893 |
Overall Negative Crossing Characteristics Subscale | 2 subscales (0–5) | Sum of subscales: Lanes/Road Width of Crossing, Crossing Impediments | 1.53 (1.48) | .587, 61.2% | See above |
Overall Subscale | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Overall Crossings Score | 2 subscales (−4-8) | Sum of subscales: Overall Positive Crossing Characteristics-Overall Negative Crossing Characteristics | 2.05 (2.27) | .830, 42.9% | See above |