“We wouldn’t of made friends if we didn’t come to Football United”:the impacts of a football program on young people’s peer, prosocial and cross-cultural relationships
© Nathan et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 17 July 2012
Accepted: 1 April 2013
Published: 27 April 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|17 Jul 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|23 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Rudolph Leon van Niekerk|
|24 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ian Boardley|
|4 Nov 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Roger Levermore|
|5 Nov 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Rylee Dionigi|
|3 Jan 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Sally Nathan|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|3 Jan 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|21 Jan 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Rudolph Leon van Niekerk|
|11 Feb 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ian Boardley|
|14 Feb 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Rylee Dionigi|
|19 Mar 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Sally Nathan|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|19 Mar 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|1 Apr 2013||Editorially accepted|
|27 Apr 2013||Article published||10.1186/1471-2458-13-399|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.