Time series analysis comparing mandatory and voluntary notification of newly diagnosed HIV infections in a city with a concentrated epidemic
© Reyes-Urueña et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 5 October 2012
Accepted: 10 April 2013
Published: 12 April 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|5 Oct 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|9 Oct 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Juliana M. Reyes|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|9 Oct 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|2 Dec 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Handan Wand|
|25 Jan 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Françoise Cazein|
|5 Mar 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Juliana M. Reyes|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|5 Mar 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|31 Mar 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Handan Wand|
|4 Apr 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Françoise Cazein|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|10 Apr 2013||Editorially accepted|
|12 Apr 2013||Article published||10.1186/1471-2458-13-338|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.