Adverse childhood experiences and frequent insufficient sleep in 5 U.S. States, 2009: a retrospective cohort study
© Chapman et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 8 August 2012
Accepted: 20 December 2012
Published: 3 January 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|8 Aug 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|22 Aug 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Daniel Chapman|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|22 Aug 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|1 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Karolin Roeser|
|4 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Anna Price|
|22 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jon Quach|
|23 Nov 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Daniel Chapman|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|23 Nov 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|27 Nov 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Karolin Roeser|
|3 Dec 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Anna Price|
|11 Dec 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Daniel Chapman|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|11 Dec 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|20 Dec 2012||Editorially accepted|
|3 Jan 2013||Article published||10.1186/1471-2458-13-3|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.