Development of a scale to measure stigma related to podoconiosis in Southern Ethiopia
© Franklin et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 22 July 2012
Accepted: 18 March 2013
Published: 4 April 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|22 Jul 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|24 Jul 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Hannah Franklin|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|24 Jul 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|29 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Michael Fay|
|5 Nov 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Pss Rao|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|11 Dec 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Hannah Franklin|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|11 Dec 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|5 Feb 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Michael Fay|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|18 Mar 2013||Editorially accepted|
|4 Apr 2013||Article published||10.1186/1471-2458-13-298|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.