Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

A screening tool to prioritize public health risk associated with accidental or deliberate release of chemicals into the atmosphere

  • David H Blakey1, 2, 20,
  • Marc Lafontaine1, 3,
  • Jocelyn Lavigne1, 3,
  • Danny Sokolowski1, 3,
  • Jean-Marc Philippe1, 4,
  • Jean-Marc Sapori1, 5,
  • Walter Biederbick1, 6, 7,
  • Regine Horre1, 7,
  • Willi B Marzi1, 8,
  • Hisayoshi Kondo1, 9,
  • Yumiko Kuroki1, 10,
  • Akira Namera1, 11,
  • Tetsu Okumura1, 12,
  • Miyako Yamamoto1, 13,
  • Mikio Yashiki1, 11,
  • Peter G Blain1, 14,
  • David R Russell1, 15Email author,
  • Susan M Cibulsky1, 16 and
  • David A Jett1, 17
BMC Public Health201313:253

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-253

Received: 26 July 2012

Accepted: 19 February 2013

Published: 21 March 2013

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
26 Jul 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
2 Nov 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - M Mohan
28 Nov 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kenichi Azuma
28 Jan 2013 Author responded Author comments - David Russell
Resubmission - Version 3
28 Jan 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 3
17 Feb 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kenichi Azuma
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
19 Feb 2013 Editorially accepted
21 Mar 2013 Article published 10.1186/1471-2458-13-253

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Chemical Events Working Group of the Global Health Security Initiative
(2)
Environmental Health, Science and Research Bureau, Health Canada
(3)
Chemical Emergency Preparedness and Response Unit, Health Canada
(4)
Poison Control Center, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Centre Antipoison
(5)
Department of Emergency Response and Preparedness, Health General Directorate (Health Ministry)
(6)
Centre for Biological Security, Robert Koch-Institut
(7)
Research, Technology & Public Health Protection, Federal Office of Civil Protection and Disaster Assistance
(8)
Civil Protection, Federal Ministry of the Interior
(9)
MHLW DMAT Bureau, National Disaster Medical Center
(10)
Tsukuba Office, Japan Poison Information Center
(11)
Forensic Medicine, Hiroshima University
(12)
Office of Assistant Chief Cabinet Secretary for National Security and Crisis Management, Cabinet Secretariat, Government of Japan
(13)
Division of Safety Information on Drug, Food and Chemicals, National Institute of Health Sciences
(14)
Medical Toxicology Centre, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne
(15)
WHO-Collaborating Centre for Chemical Incidents, The Health Protection Agency, Cardiff Metropolitan University
(16)
Health and Human Services, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response
(17)
NINDS, National Institutes of Health
(18)
the Global Health Security Initiative

Advertisement