Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Exploring knowledge, attitudes and practices related to diabetes in Mongolia: a national population-based survey

  • Alessandro R Demaio1, 2Email author,
  • Dugee Otgontuya3,
  • Maximilian de Courten4,
  • Ib C Bygbjerg4,
  • Palam Enkhtuya5,
  • Janchiv Oyunbileg5 and
  • Dan W Meyrowitsch6
BMC Public Health201313:236

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-236

Received: 23 August 2012

Accepted: 11 March 2013

Published: 18 March 2013

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
23 Aug 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
6 Dec 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jodie Katon
7 Jan 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David Chaney
24 Jan 2013 Author responded Author comments - Otgontuya Dugee
Resubmission - Version 4
24 Jan 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 4
6 Feb 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jodie Katon
11 Feb 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David Chaney
19 Feb 2013 Author responded Author comments - Otgontuya Dugee
Resubmission - Version 5
19 Feb 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 5
4 Mar 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jodie Katon
7 Mar 2013 Author responded Author comments - Otgontuya Dugee
Resubmission - Version 6
7 Mar 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
11 Mar 2013 Editorially accepted
18 Mar 2013 Article published 10.1186/1471-2458-13-236

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen
(2)
Copenhagen School of Global Health, University of Copenhagen
(3)
Public Health Institute, Mongolian Ministry of Health
(4)
Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen
(5)
Public Health Institute, Mongolian Ministry of Health
(6)
Department of Health Services Research, Institute of Public Health, University of Copenhagen

Advertisement