Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

A systematic review of qualitative findings on factors enabling and deterring uptake of HIV testing in Sub-Saharan Africa

  • Maurice Musheke1, 2, 3Email author,
  • Harriet Ntalasha4,
  • Sara Gari2, 3,
  • Oran Mckenzie2,
  • Virginia Bond1, 5,
  • Adriane Martin-Hilber2, 3 and
  • Sonja Merten2, 3
BMC Public Health201313:220

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-220

Received: 11 September 2012

Accepted: 6 March 2013

Published: 11 March 2013

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
11 Sep 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
4 Dec 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jessika Deblonde
22 Jan 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Fredrick Makumbi
25 Feb 2013 Author responded Author comments - Maurice Musheke
Resubmission - Version 3
25 Feb 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
6 Mar 2013 Editorially accepted
11 Mar 2013 Article published 10.1186/1471-2458-13-220

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Zambia AIDS-related TB Research Project, University of Zambia
(2)
Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute
(3)
University of Basel, Faculty of Science
(4)
Department of Social Development Studies, University of Zambia
(5)
Department of Global Health and Development, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine

Advertisement