Exploring knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to alcohol in Mongolia: a national population-based survey
© Demaio et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 23 August 2012
Accepted: 22 February 2013
Published: 27 February 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|23 Aug 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|29 Sep 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - David Beran|
|5 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Patricia Chou|
|6 Nov 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Otgontuya Dugee|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|6 Nov 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|14 Nov 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - David Beran|
|30 Nov 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Patricia Chou|
|12 Dec 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Otgontuya Dugee|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|12 Dec 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|17 Dec 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - David Beran|
|19 Jan 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Patricia Chou|
|21 Jan 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Otgontuya Dugee|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|21 Jan 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|22 Feb 2013||Editorially accepted|
|27 Feb 2013||Article published||10.1186/1471-2458-13-178|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.