Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Second-stage non-response in the Swiss health survey: determinants and bias in outcomes

BMC Public Health201313:167

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-167

Received: 11 October 2012

Accepted: 21 February 2013

Published: 23 February 2013

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
11 Oct 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
19 Nov 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Stefaan Demarest
30 Nov 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Marie-Noël Vercambre
19 Dec 2012 Author responded Author comments - Thomas Volken
Resubmission - Version 3
19 Dec 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
20 Dec 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Marie-Noël Vercambre
7 Feb 2013 Author responded Author comments - Thomas Volken
Resubmission - Version 7
7 Feb 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
21 Feb 2013 Editorially accepted
23 Feb 2013 Article published 10.1186/1471-2458-13-167

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
School of Health Professions, Zurich University of Applied Sciences

Advertisement