A systematic review of intervention effects on potential mediators of children’s physical activity
© Brown et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 3 August 2012
Accepted: 20 February 2013
Published: 23 February 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|3 Aug 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|21 Sep 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - David Lubans|
|5 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Mathias Loch|
|22 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Esther van Sluijs|
|28 Jan 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Helen Brown|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|28 Jan 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|10 Feb 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Esther van Sluijs|
|17 Feb 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Helen Brown|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|17 Feb 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|20 Feb 2013||Editorially accepted|
|23 Feb 2013||Article published||10.1186/1471-2458-13-165|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.